Thinking collaboratively about the peer-review process for journal-article publication

Harvard Educational Review

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 257-285

  Kumashiro, Kevin K ^a   Pinar, William F ^b   Graue, Elizabeth ^b   Grant, Carl A ^c   Benham, Maenette K P ^d   Heck, Ronald H ^e   Scheurich, James Joseph ^f   Luke, Allan ^g   Luke, Carmen ^h  

^a Center for Anti Oppressive Education   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^f TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^h UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144461700     PISSN: 00178055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17763/haer.75.3.h317564n18346928     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Apple, M. (1999). What counts as legitimate knowledge? The social production and use of reviews. Review of Educational Research, 69, 343-346.
2. Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies. (2003). Professional ethics and standards for scholars in curriculum studies and accreditation standards for programs in education. Retreived June 2, 2003, from http://www.iaacs.org/.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television and journalism. London: Pluto Press.
5. Burbules, N. C., & Bruce, B. C. (1995). This is not a paper. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 12-18.
6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
7. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
8. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
9. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage Books.
10. Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
11. Grant, C. A., & Graue, E. (1999). What kind of tool is a review? Editors' introduction to companion essays. Review of Educational Research, 69, 1.
12. Kumashiro, K. K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70, 25-53.
13. Kumashiro, K. K. (2001). "Posts" perspectives on anti-oppressive education in social studies, English, mathematics, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 3-12.
14. Kumashiro, K. K. (2002a). Against repetition: Addressing resistance to anti-oppressive change in the practices of learning, teaching, supervising, and researching. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 67-92.
15. Kumashiro, K. K. (2002b). Three readings of D. Butin's commentary. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 17-18.
16. Kumashiro, K. K. (2003). Five tips for publishing journal articles. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 1(2), 89-95.
17. Ladwig, J. (1996). Academic distinctions. New York: Routledge.
18. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1999). Editorial statement. American Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 45.
19. Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: The work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69, 2-7.
20. Rasberry, W. (2003, June 30). Closing the race gap. Washington Post, p. A15.
21. Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22. Williams, P. J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a law professor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Willinsky, J. (2000). Technologies of knowing: A proposal for the human sciences. Boston: Beacon Press.
24. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling. Albany: State University of New York Press.