A primer on peer review

Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-3

  Foster, Roxie L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

HUMANS; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 37249073950     PISSN: 15390136     EISSN: 17446155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2008.00127.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Balistreri, W. F. (2007). Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts. Journal of Pediatrics, 151, 107 108.
2. Broome, M. E. (2004). Self-plagiarism: Oxymoron, fair use, or scientific misconduct? Nursing Outlook, 52 (6 273 274.
3. Callaham, M. L. Tercier, J. (2007). The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. PLoS Medicine, 4 (1 32 40.
4. Foster, R. L. (2007). Avoiding unintentional plagiarism. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 12 (1 1 2.
5. Jefferson, T., Rudin, M., Brodney Folse, S. Davidoff, F. (2007). Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, 1 33.
6. Pierson, C. (2007). Guidebook for manuscript reviewers. Retrieved September 30, 2007, from http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/forreviewers.asp
7. Rockwell, S. (2005). Ethics of peer review: A guide for manuscript reviewers. Retrieved September 28, 2007, from http://ori.dhhs.gov/education/ products/yale/prethics.pdf