The relationships of turtles within amniotes

Biology of Turtles: From Structures to Strategies of Life

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 345-354

  Rieppel, Olivier ^a  

^a FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 66149122868     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420004977     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Ax, P., Das Phylogenetische System, Stuttgart: Fischer, 1984.
2. Baur, G., On the morphology of the vertebrate skull, J. Morphol., 3, 467-474, 1889.
3. Baur, G., Bemerkungen über die Osteologie der Schläfengegend der Höheren Wirbeltiere, Anat. Anz., 10, 315-330, 1895.
4. Bentley, P.J., Osmoregulation, in Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 5, C. Gans and W.R. Dawson (eds.), London: Academic Press, 1976, 365-412.
5. Boulenger, G.A., Sur la place des chéloniens dans la classification, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 169, 605-607, 1918.
6. Brochu, C.A., Progress and future directions in archosaur phylogenetics, J. Paleont., 75, 1185-1201, 2001.
7. Broom, R., On the classification of the reptiles, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 51, 39-65, 1924.
8. Burke, A.C., Development of the turtle carapace: implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan, J. Morph., 199, 363-378, 1989.
9. Burke, A.C., The development and evolution of the turtle body plan: Inferring intrinsic aspects of the evolutionary process from experimental embryology, Am. Zool., 31, 616-627, 1991.
10. Cao, Y., Sorenson, M.D., Kumazawa, Y., Mindell D.P., and Hasegawa, M., Phylogenetic position of turtles among amniotes: Evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes, Gene, 259, 139-148, 2000.
11. Carroll, R.L., Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, New York: W.H. Freeman, 1988.
12. Cope, E.D., On the homologies of the posterior cranial arches in the Reptilia, Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., N.S., 17, 11-26, 1893.
13. DeBeer, G.S., The Development of the Vertebrate Skull, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1937.
14. DeBraga, M., and Rieppel, O., Reptile phylogeny and the interrelationships of turtles, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 120, 281-354, 1997.
15. Gaffney, E.S., Phylogenetic relationships of the major groups of amniotes, in The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates, A.L. Panchen (ed.), London: Academic Press, 1980, 593.
16. Gaffney, E.S., The comparative osteology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 194, 1-263, 1990.
17. Gaffney, E.S., and McKenna, M.C., A Late Permian captorhinid from Rhodesia, Am. Mus. Novitates, 2688, 1-15, 1979.
18. Gaffney, E.S., and Meylan, P.A., A phylogeny of the turtles, in The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, M.J. Benton (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, 157-219.
19. Gans, C., and Hughes, G.M., The mechanism of lung ventilation in the tortoise Testudo graeca Linné, J. Exp. Biol., 47, 1-20, 1997.
20. Gardiner, B.G., Haematothermia: Warm-blooded amniotes, Cladistics, 9, 369-395, 1993.
21. Gaunt, A.S., and Gans, C., Mechanics of respiration in the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina (Linné), J. Morphol., 128, 195-228, 1969.
22. Gauthier, J.A., Kluge, A.G., and Rowe, T., Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils, Cladistics, 4, 104-209, 1988.
23. Gilbert, S.F., Loredo, G.A., Brukman, A., and Burke, A.C., Morphogenesis of the turtle shell: The development of a novel structure in tetrapod evolution, Evol. Dev., 3, 47-58, 2001.
24. Gilbert, S.F., Cebra-Thomas, J.A., and Fraser, T., Working hypothesis for the origin of the turtle shell, J. Morphol., 260, 294, 2004.
25. Goette, A., Über die Entwicklung des knöchernen Rückenschildes (Carapax) der Schildkröten, Z. wiss. Zool., 66, 407, 1899.
26. Goodrich, E.S., On the classification of the Reptilia, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 89, 261-276, 1916.
27. Goodrich, E.S., Studies on the Structure and Development of Vertebrates, London: Macmillan, 1930.
28. Gorr, T.A., Mable, B.K., and Kleinschmitt, T., Phylogenetic analysis of reptilian hemoglobins: Trees, rates, and divergences, J. Mol. Evol., 47, 471-485, 1998.
29. Gregory, W.K., Pareiasaurs versus placodonts as near ancestors to turtles, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 86, 275-326, 1946.
30. Hagdorn, H., and Rieppel, O., Stratigraphy of marine reptiles in the Triassic of Central Europe, Zentralbl. Geol. Paläont. I., 1998, 651-678, 1999.
31. Harris, S.R., Pisani, D., Gower, D, J., and Wilkinson, M., Investigating stagnation in morphologies using consensus data, Syst. Biol., 56, 125-129, 2007.
32. Hedges, S.B., and Poling, L.L., A molecular phylogeny of reptiles, Science, 283, 998-1001, 1999.
33. Hennig, W., Stammesgeschichte der Chordaten, Fortschr. Zool. Syst. Evolutforsch., 2, 1-208, 1983.
34. Hill, R.V., Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: The importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling, Syst. Biol., 54, 530-547, 2005.
35. Hofsten, N., On the phylogeny of the Reptilia, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 20, 501-521, 1941.
36. Iwabe, N., Hara, Y., Kumazawa, Y., Shibamoto, K., Saito, Y., Miyata, T., and Katho, K., Sister group relationship of turtles to the bird-crocodilian clade revealed nuclear DNA-coded proteins, Mol. Biol. Evol., 22, 810-813, 2005.
37. Jaekel, O., Die Wirbeltierfunde aus dem Keuper von Halberstadt. Serie II. Testudinata. Teil 1. Stegochelys dux n. g. n. ap., Palaeont. Z., 2. 88-214, 1915.
38. Janke, A., Erpenbeck, D., Nilsson, M., and Arnason, U., The mitochondrial genomes of the iguana (Iguana iguana) and the caiman (Caiman crocodylus): implications for amniote phylogeny, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268, 623-631, 2001.
39. Joyce, W.G., Phylogenetic relationships of Mesozoic turtles, Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., 48, 3-102, 2007.
40. Joyce, W.G., and Gauthier, J.A., Paleoecology of Triassic stem turtles sheds new light on turtle origins, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 271, 1-5, 2004.
41. Joyce, W.G., and Karl, H.-V., The worlds oldest fossil turtle: fact versus fiction, Russ. J. Herpetol., 13 (Suppl.), 104-111, 2006.
42. Joyce, W.G., Jenkins, F.A. Jr., and Rowe, T., The presence of cleithra in the basal turtle Kayentachelys aprix, Russ. J. Herpetol., 13 (Suppl.), 93-103, 2006.
43. Kälin, J., Zur Morphogenese des Panzers bei den Schildkröten, Acta Anat., 1, 144-176, 1945.
44. Karl, H.-V., The homology of the supramarginals in turtles (Reptilia: Chelonii), Stud. Geol. Salamanticensia, 41, 63-75, 2005.
45. Kirsch, J.A.W., and Mayer, G.C., The platypus is not a rodent: DNA hybridization, amniote phylogeny and the palimpsest theory, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 353, 1221-1237, 1998.
46. Kuhn-Schnyder, E., Observations on temporal openings of reptilian skulls and the classification of reptiles, in Aspects of Vertebrate History, Essays in Honor of Edwin Harris Colbert, L.L. Jacobs (ed.), Flagstaff, AZ: Museum of Northern Arizona Press, 1980, 153-175.
47. Kumazawa, Y., and Nishida, M., Complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of the green turtle and blue-tailed mole skink: Statistical evidence for archosaurian affinity of turtles, Mol. Biol. Evol., 16, 784-792, 1999.
48. Kuraku, S., Usuda, R., and Kuratani, S., Comprehensive survey of carapacial ridge-specific genes in turtle implies co-option of some regulatory genes in carapace evolution, Evol. Dev., 7, 3-17, 2005.
49. Lakjer, T., Studien über die Trigeminus-versorgte Kaumuskulatur der Sauropsiden, Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzel, 1926.
50. Laurin, M., and Reisz, R.R., A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 113, 165-223, 1995.
51. Laurin, M., and Reisz, R.R., A new perspective on tetrapod phylogeny, in Amniote Origins: Completing the Transition to Land, S.S. Sumida and K.L.M. Martin (eds.), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997, 9-59.
52. Lee, M.S.Y., The origin of the turtle body plan: Bridging a famous morphological gap, Science, 261, 1716-1720, 1993.
53. Lee, M.S.Y., Historical burden in systematics and the interrelationships of ‘parareptiles’, Biol. Rev., 70, 459-547, 1995.
54. Lee, M.S.Y., Correlated progression and the origin of turtles, Nature, 379, 811-815, 1996.
55. Lee, M.S.Y., Pareiasaur phylogeny and the origin of turtles, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 120, 197-280, 1997a.
56. Lee, M.S.Y., Reptile relationships turn turtle…and turn back again, Nature, 389, 245, 1997b.
57. Lee, M.S.Y., Molecules, morphology, and the monophyly of diapsid reptiles, Contr. Zool., 70, 1-22, 2001.
58. Li, Y.-J., and Tsoi, C.-M., Phylogenetic analysis of vertebrate lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) multigene families, J. Mol. Evol., 54, 614-624, 2002.
59. Lovtrup, S., The Phylogeny of Vertebrata, London: John Wiley, 1977.
60. Lovtrup, S., On the classification of the taxon Tetrapoda, Syst. Zool., 34, 463-470, 1985.
61. Mannen, H., and Li, S.S.-L., Molecular evidence for a clade of turtles, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 13, 144-148, 1999.
62. Merck, J.W., A phylogenetic analysis of the euryapsid reptiles, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 1997.
63. Mindell, D.P., Sorenson, M.D., Dimcheff, D.E., Hasegawa, M., Ast, J.C., and Yuri, T., Interordinal relationships of birds and other reptiles based on whole mitochondrial genomes, Syst. Biol., 48, 138-152, 1999.
64. Nixon, K.C., and Carpenter, J.M., On simultaneous analysis, Cladistics, 12, 221-241, 1996.
65. Olson, E.C., The family Diadectidae and its bearing on the classification of reptiles, Fieldiana (Geol.), 11, 1-53, 1947.
66. Osborn, H.F., On the primary division of the Reptilia into two subclasses, Synapsida and Diapsida, Science, 17, 275-276, 1903.
67. Page, R.D.M., Extracting species trees from complex gene trees: Reconciled trees and vertebrate phylogeny, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 14, 89-106., 2000.
68. Platz, J.E., and Conlon, J.M., Reptile relationships turn turtle… and turn back again, Nature, 389, 245-246, 1997.
69. Reisz, R.R., A diapsid reptile from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas, Spec. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Ks., 7, 1-74, 1981.
70. Reisz, R.R., and Laurin, M., Owenetta and the origin of turtles, Nature, 349, 324-326, 1991.
71. Remane, A., Die Geschichte der Tiere, in Die Evolution der Organismen, Band 1. 2. Aufl., G. Heberer (ed.), Stuttgart: Fischer, 1959, 340-422.
72. Rest, J.S., Ast, C.J., Austin, C.C., Waddell, P.J., Tibbetts, E.A., Hay, J.M., and Mindell, D.P., Molecular systematics of primary reptilian lineages and the tuatara mitochondrial genome, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 29, 289-297, 2003.
73. Rieppel, O., The development of the jaw adductor musculature in the turtle Chelydra serpentina, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 98, 27-62, 1990.
74. Rieppel, O., Osteology of Simosaurus gaillardoti, and the phylogenetic interrelationships of stem-group Sauropterygia, Fieldiana (Geol.), n.s. 28, 1-85, 1994.
75. Rieppel, O., Studies on skeleton formation in reptiles: Implications for turtle relationships, Zoology, 98, 298-308, 1995.
76. Rieppel, O., Testing homology by congruence-the pectoral girdle of turtles, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 263, 1395-1398, 1996.
77. Rieppel, O., Turtles as diapsid reptiles, Zool. Script., 29, 199-212, 2000a.
78. Rieppel, O., Sauropterygia I: Placodontia, Pachypleurosauria, Nothosauroidea, Pistosauroidea, Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, Vol. 12A, Munich: Pfeil, 2000b.
79. Rieppel, O., Turtles as hopeful monsters, BioEssays, 23, 987-991, 2001.
80. Rieppel, O., and DeBraga M., Turtles as diapsid reptiles, Nature, 384, 453-455, 1996.
81. Rieppel, O., and Kearney, M., The poverty of taxonomic characters, Biol. Philos., 22, 95-113, 2006.
82. Rieppel, O., and Reisz, R.R., The origin and early evolution of turtles, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 30, 1-22, 1999.
83. Romer, A.S., Osteology of the Reptiles, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
84. Romer, A.S., Notes and Comments on Vertebrate Paleontology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
85. Ruckes, H., Studies in chelonian osteology. Part II. The morphological relationships between girdles, ribs and carapace, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 31, 81-120, 1929.
86. Walker, W.F., A structural and functional analysis of walking in the turtle, Chrysemis picta marginata, J. Morphol., 134, 195-214, 1971.
87. Wild, R., Die Wirbeltierfaunen der fränkischen und südalpinen Mitteltrias (ein Vergleich), Z. Deutsch. Geol. Ges., 123, 229-234, 1972.
88. Williston, S.W., The phylogeny and classification of reptiles, J. Geol., 25, 411-421, 1917.
89. Vallén, E., Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ontogenie und der vergleichenden Anatomie des Schildkrötenpanzers, Acta Zool., 23, 1-127, 1942.
90. Versluys, J., Über die Phylogenie des Panzers der Schildkröten und über die Verwandtschaft der Lederschildkröte (Dermochelys coriacea), Paläont. Z., 1, 321-347, 1914.
91. Völker, H., Über das Stamm-, Gliedmaßen-, und Hautskelett von Dermochelys coriacea L., Zool. Jahrb. Anat., 33, 431-552, 1913.
92. Zangerl, R., The homology of the shell elements in turtles, J. Morph., 65, 383-406, 1939.
93. Zangerl, R., The turtle shell, in Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 1, C. Gans, T.S. Parsons, and A.d’A. Bellairs (eds.), London: Academic Press, 1969, 311-339.
94. Zardoya, R., and Meyer, A., Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 95, 14226-14231, 1998.