Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients

Stroke

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1213-1217

  Pickard, A Simon ^a,c   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^a,c   Penn, Andrew ^a   Lau, Francis ^b   Noseworthy, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c Institute of Pharmaco Economics   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health status; Quality of life; Stroke outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STROKE;

EID: 0033059683     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.30.6.1213     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke. 1996; 27:1812-1816.
2. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-226.
3. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: an even snorter health survey. Med Outcomes Trust Bull. 1996;4:2.
4. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Boston, Mass: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
5. Jenkinson C, Layte R. The development and testing of the UK SF-12. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:14-18.
6. Dorman PJ, Slattery JM, Farrell B, Dennis MS, Sandercock PA, and the United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. A randomized comparison of the EuroQol and SF-36 after stroke. BMJ. 1997; 315:461.
7. SAS Inc. The SAS System for Windows, Release 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1996.
8. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:142S-158S.
9. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows, Release 7.5.1, Standard Version. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 1996.
10. Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Goldstein LB, Bonito A, Witter DM, Enarson C, Matchar D. Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:740-745.
11. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
12. Williams LS. Health-related quality of life outcomes in stroke. Neuroepidemiology. 1998;17:116-120.
13. Mathias SD, Bates MM, Pasta DJ, Cisternas MG, Feeny D, Patrick DL. Use of the Health Utilities Index with stroke patients and their caregivers. Stroke. 1997;28:1888-1894.
14. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery JM, Dennis M, Sandercock PA, and the United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate and unbiased? Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887.
15. Rothman ML, Hedrick SC, Bulcroft KA, Hickam DH, Rubenstein LZ. The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care. 1991;29:115-124.
16. Segal ME, Schall RR. Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke. 1994;25:2391-2397.
17. Kivinen P, Halonen P, Eronen M, Nissinen A. Self-rated health, physician-rated health and associated factors explaining differences between self-rated and physician-rated health. Age Aging. 1998;27: 41-47.