Effects of processing bias on the recognition of composite face halves

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1038-1042

  Weston, Nicola J ^a   Perfect, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646716488     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206440     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. BARTLETT, J. C., & SEARCY, S. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
2. BOUTET, I., COLLIN, C., & HAUBERT, J. (2003). Configurai face encoding and spatial frequency information. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1078-1093.
3. BROWN, C., & LLOYD-JONES, T. J. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in a multiple face presentation paradigm: Effects of description instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 873-885.
4. DIAMOND, R., & CAREY, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
5. DODSON, C. S., JOHNSON, M. K., & SCHOOLER, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25 (2), 129-139.
6. DUNNING, D., & STERN, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate frominaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality A Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.
7. FALLSHORE, M., & SCHOOLER, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
8. LEDER, H., & BRUCE, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
9. LINDSAY, R. C. L., & WELLS, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from line-ups: Simultaneous versus sequential line-up presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
10. MACRAE, C. N., & LEWIS, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196.
11. MELCHER, J. M., & SCHOOLER, J. W. (1996). The misremembrance of wines past: Verbal and perceptual expertise differentially mediate verbal overshadowing of taste memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 231-245.
12. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
13. PERFECT, T. J. (2003). Local processing bias impairs line-up performance. Psychological Reports, 93, 393-394.
14. PERFECT, T. J. (2004, September). The effects of local and global processing on line-up performance. Paper presented at the BPS Cognitive Section Annual Conference, Leeds.
15. ROBERTSON, L. C. (1996). Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 227-249.
16. RYAN, R. S., & SCHOOLER, J. W. (1998). Whom do words hurt? Individual differences in susceptibility to verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, S105-S125.
17. SCHOOLER, J. W. (2002).Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-998.
18. SCHOOLER, J. W., & ENGSTLER-SCHOOLER, T. Y. (1990). Verbal over-shadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
19. SHULMAN, G. L., & WILSON, J. (1987). Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information. Perception, 16, 89-101.
20. TANAKA, J. W., & FARAH, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
21. THOMPSON, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
22. WESTERMAN, D. L., & LARSEN, J. D. (1997). Verbal overshadowing effect: Evidence for a general shift in processing. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 417-428.
23. YIN, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
24. YOUNG, A. W., HELLAWELL, D., & HAY, D. C. (1987). Configurai information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.