Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Arnold, Derek H ^a   Ong, Yolanda ^a   Roseboom, Warrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Flash lag; Image contrast; Visual latency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX;

COLOR PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 65549132757     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.5.4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, W. J., & Mamassian, P. (2004). The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 139-146.
2. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2003). The "Flash-Lag" occurs in audition and cross-modally. Current Biology, 13, 59-63.
3. Anstis, S. M., & Cavanagh, P. (1983). A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance. In J. Mollon & R. T. Sharpe (Eds.), Color vision: Physiology and psychophysics (pp. 156-166). London: Academic.
4. Arnold, D. H., & Clifford, C. W. (2002). Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 579-583.
5. Arnold, D. H., Clifford, C. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). Asynchronous processing in vision: Color leads motion. Current Biology, 11, 596-600.
6. Arnold, D. H., Durant, S., & Johnston, A. (2003). Latency differences and the flash-lag effect. Vision Research, 43, 1829-1835.
7. Arnold, D. H., & Wilcock, P. (2007). Cortical processing and perceived timing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2331-2336.
8. Baldo, M. V., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature, 378, 565-566.
9. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (1998). The theory of multistage integration in the visual brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 2327-2332.
10. Bedell, H. E., Chung, S. T., Ogmen, H., &Patel, S. S. (2003). Color and motion: Which is the tortoise and which is the hare? Vision Research, 43, 2403-2412.
11. Berry, M. J., II, Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T., & Meister, M. (1999). Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature, 398, 334-338.
12. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. (2000). Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research, 40, 1645-1648.
13. Burr, D. C., & Corsale, B. (2001). Dependency of reaction times to motion onset on luminance and chromatic contrast. Vision Research, 41, 1039-1048.
14. Clifford, C. W., Arnold, D. H., & Pearson, J. (2003). A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation. Vision Research, 43, 2245-2253.
15. Derrington, A. M., Krauskopf, J., & Lennie, P. (1984). Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. The Journal of Physiology, 357, 241-265.
16. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000a). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036-2038.
17. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000b). The position of moving objects. Science, 289, 1107a.
18. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
19. Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Schöner, G., & Dinse, H. R. (2004). Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 556, 971-982.
20. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2000). The position of moving objects. Science, 289, 1107.
21. Lennie, P. (1981). The physiological basis of variations in visual latency. Vision Research, 21, 815-824.
22. Mackay, D. M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature, 181, 507-508.
23. Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997). A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264, 393-399.
24. Murakami, I. (2001). A flash-lag effect in random motion. Vision Research, 41, 3101-3119.
25. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370, 256-257.
26. Nishida, S., & Johnston, A. (2002). Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Current Biology, 12, 359-368.
27. Ogmen, H., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Camuz, K. (2004). Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag. Vision Research, 44, 2109-2128.
28. Orban, G. A., Hoffmann, K. P., & Duysens, J. (1985). Velocity selectivity in the cat visual system. I. Response of LGN cells to moving bar stimuli: A comparison with cortical areas 17 and 18. Journal of Neurophysiology, 54, 1026-1049.
29. Patel, S. S., Ogmen, H., Bedell, H. E., & Sampath, V. (2000). Flash-lag effect: Differential latency, not postdiction. Science, 290, 1051.
30. Paul, L., & Schyns, P. G. (2003). Attention enhances feature integration. Vision Research, 43, 1793-1798.
31. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential latency. Nature, 396, 424.
32. Raiguel, S. E., Lagae, L., Gulyas, B., & Orban, G. A. (1989). Response latencies of visual cells in macaque area V1, V2 and V5. Brain Research, 493, 155-159.
33. Rao, R. P., Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2001). Optimal smoothing in visual motion perception. Neural Computation, 13, 1243-1253.
34. Roufs, J. A. (1963). Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Research, 3, 81-91.
35. Sheth, B. R., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 489-495.
36. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 656-657.
37. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research, 40, 137-149.
38. Williams, J. M., & Lit, A. (1983). Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Research, 23, 171-179.
39. Wilson, J. A., & Anstis, S. M. (1969). Visual delay as a function of luminance. American Journal of Psychology, 82, 350-358.
40. Wojtach, W. T., Sung, K., Truong, S., & Purves, D. (2008). An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 16338-16343.
41. Zeki, S. (1978). Functional specialization in the visual cortex of the monkey. Nature, 274, 423-428.