Latency differences and the flash-lag effect

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 1829-1835

  Arnold, Derek H ^a,b   Durant, Szonya ^a   Johnston, Alan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Differential latency; Flash lag effect; Orientation; Tilt illusion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0038798772     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00281-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alais D., Burr D. The flash-lag effect occurs in audition and cross-modally. Current Biology. 13:2003;59-63.
2. Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 40:2000;1645-1648.
3. Carlile S., Leong P., Hyams S. The nature and distribution errors in the localization of sounds by humans. Hearing Research. 114:1997;179-196.
4. Clifford C.W.G., Wenderoth P., Spehar B. A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences. 267:2000;1705-1710.
5. Coltheart M. Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review. 78:1971;114-121.
6. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science. 287:2000;2036-2038.
7. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Untangling spatial from temporal illusions. Trends in Neurosciences. 25:2002;293.
8. Gibson J.J., Radner M. Adaptation and contrast in perception of tilted lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 20:1937;453-469.
9. Hughes P.C., Brecher G.A., Fishkin S.M. Effects of rotating backgrounds upon the perception of verticality. Perception and Psychophysics. 11:1972;135-138.
10. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Response: untangling spatial from temporal illusions. Trends in Neurosciences. 25:2002;294.
11. Levi D.M., McGraw P.V., Klein S.A. Vernier and contrast discrimination in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research. 40:2000;973-988.
12. Mackay D.M. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature. 181:1958;507-508.
13. Mateeff S., Hohnsbein J. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Research. 28:1988;711-719.
14. Murakami I. A flash-lag effect in random motion. Vision Research. 41:2001;3101-3119.
15. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature. 370:1994;256-257.
16. Orban G.A., Hoffmann K.P., Duysens J. Velocity selectivity in the cat visual system. I. Response of LGN cells to moving bar stimuli: a comparison with cortical areas 17 and 18. Journal of Neurophysiology. 54:1985;1026-1049.
17. Patel S.S., Ogmen H., Bedell H.E., Sampath V. Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Science. 290:2000;1051.
18. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., Ogmen H. Moving ahead through differential latency. Nature. 396:1998;424.
19. Raiguel S., Lagae L., Gulyas B., Orban G.A. Response latencies of visual cells in macaque area V1, V2 and V5. Brain Research. 493:1989;155-159.
20. Rao R.P.N., Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Optimal smoothing in visual motion perception. Neural Computation. 13:2001;1243-1253.
21. Schmolesky M.T., Wang Y., Hanes D.P., Thompson K.G., Leutgeb S., Schall J.D., Leventhal A.G. Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology. 79:1998;3272-3278.
22. Sheth B.R., Nijhawan R., Shimojo S. Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience. 3:2000;489-495.
23. Wenderoth P., van der Zwan R. The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions. Perception and Psychophysics. 46:1989;338-344.
24. Westheimer G. Simultaneous orientation contrast for lines in the human fovea. Vision Research. 30:1990;1913-1921.
25. Whitney D., Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;656-657.
26. Whitney D., Murakami I., Cavanagh P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research. 40:2000;137-149.