An integrated pneumatic tactile feedback actuator array for robotic surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 13-19

  Franco, Miguel L ^a   King, Chih Hung ^a   Culjat, Martin O ^a,b   Lewis, Catherine E ^a,b   Bisley, James W ^a,b   Holmes, Carmack E ^a,b   Grundfest, Warren S ^a,b   Dutson, Eric P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Actuator; Robotic surgery; Tactile feedback

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; PNEUMATIC ACTUATORS; PNEUMATICS; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ACTUATOR ARRAYS; HUMAN PERCEPTION; INDEX FINGER; INFLATION LEVELS; PERFORMANCE; POTENTIAL INTERFERENCES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE; TACTILE FEEDBACK;

BALLOONS;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PNEUMATIC TOOL; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOUCH;

EID: 65349189557     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.224     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Feussner H, Siewart JR. Reduction of surgical access trauma: reliable advantages. Chirurgy 2001; 72(3): 236-244.
2. Jacobs JK, Goldstein RE, Geer JR. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a new standard of care. Ann Surg 1997; 225(5): 495-501.
3. Marescaux J, Smith MK, Folscher D, et al. Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 1-7.
4. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic surgery - a current perspective. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 14-21.
5. Burdea GC. Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. Wiley: New York, 1996; 3-4.
6. Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 2004; 188(4A): 2-15S.
7. Okamura AM, Webster RJ, Nolin JT, et al. The haptic scissors: cutting in virtual environments. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003; 828-833.
8. Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane MP, et al. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery-experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221.
9. Hu T, Castellanos AE, Tholey G, et al. Real-time haptic feedback in laparoscopic tools for use in gastro-intestinal surgery. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2002; 2488: 66-74.
10. Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M. A force reflective master-slave system for minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003; 3077-3082.
11. Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M, et al. Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 2004; 14(3): 191-195.
12. Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura A. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129(1): 151-158.
13. Culjat M, King CH, Franco M, et al. Pneumatic balloon actuators for tactile feedback in robotic surgery. Indust Robot 2008; 35(5): 449-455.
14. King CH, Franco ML, Culjat MO, et al. Fabrication and characterization of a balloon actuator array for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. ASME J Med Devices 2008; 2: 1-7.
15. King CH, Culjat MO, Franco ML, et al. Optimization of pneumatic balloon tactile display for robotic surgery based on human perception. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008; 11(5): 2593-2600.
16. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 2004; 135(1): 21-27.
17. Hirsh IJ, Sherrick CE. Perceived order in different sense modalities. J Exp Psychol 1961; 62(5): 423-432.