Operation Compatibility: A Neglected Contribution to Dual-Task Costs

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 447-460

  Pannebakker, Merel M ^a   Band, Guido P H ^a   Ridderinkhof, K Richard ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dual task performance; processing limitations; PRP paradigm; working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REFERENCE VALUE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349177045     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013029     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., and Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umiltǎ C., and Moscovitch M. (Eds). Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 421-452
2. Baddeley A.D. Working memory (1986), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
3. Band G.P.H., and Miller J. Mental rotation interferes with response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 319-338
4. Band G.P.H., and van Nes F.T. Reconfiguration and the bottleneck: Does task switching affect the refractory period effect?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18 (2006) 593-623
5. Bornemann E. Untersuchungen uber den Grad der geistigen Beanspruchung: I. Teil. Ausarbeitung der Methode. Arbeitsphysiologie 12 (1942) 142-172
6. Carrier L.M., and Pashler H. Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 1339-1348
7. Coles M.G., Gratton G., Bashore T.R., Eriksen C.W., and Donchin E. A psychophysical investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 529-553
8. Corballis M.C. Is mental rotation controlled or automatic?. Memory & Cognition 14 (1986) 124-128
9. Corballis M.C., and McLaren R. Interaction between perceived and imagined rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 (1982) 215-224
10. Graf M., Kaping D., and Bülthoff H.H. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 214-221
11. Heil M., Bajrić J., Rosler F., and Hennighausen E. A rotation aftereffect changes both the speed and the preferred direction of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 681-692
12. Heil M., Wahl K., and Herbst M. Mental rotation, memory scanning, and the central bottleneck. Psychological Research 62 (1999) 48-61
13. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1368-1384
14. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. The theory of event-coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 849-937
15. Kahneman D. Attention and effort (1973), Prentice-Hall, New York
16. Keele S.W. Attention and human performance (1973), Goodyear Publishing Company, Pacific Palisades, CA
17. Kerr B. Processing demands during mental operations. Memory and Cognition 1 (1973) 401-412
18. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
19. Kornblum S., and Lee J. Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 855-875
20. Lien M.C., Schweickert R., and Proctor R.W. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 692-712
21. Logan G.D., and Delheimer J.A. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 668-685
22. Logan G.D., and Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 393-434
23. Logan G.D., and Schulkind M.D. Parallel memory retrieval in dual task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1072-1090
24. Luria R., and Meiran N. Increased control demand results in serial processing. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 833-840
25. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 3-65
26. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 749-791
27. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance. In: Gopher D., and Koriat A. (Eds). Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 17-88
28. Miller E.K., and Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (2001) 167-202
29. Müsseler J., and Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 861-872
30. Navon D., and Gopher D. On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review 86 (1979) 214-255
31. Navon D., and Miller J.O. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 44 (2002) 193-251
32. Norman D.A., and Bobrow D.G. On data-limited and resource limited processes. Cognitive Psychology 7 (1975) 44-64
33. Norman D.A., and Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson R.J., Schwartz G.E., and Shapiro D. (Eds). Consciousness and self-regulation 4 (1986), Plenum Press, New York 1-18
34. Oberauer K., and Göthe K. Dual-task effects in working memory: Interference between two processing tasks, between two memory demands, and between storage and processing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18 (2006) 493-519
35. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 220-244
36. Pashler H. Task switching and multitask performance. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge MA 277-307
37. Ratcliff R. Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 238-255
38. Ridderinkhof K.R. Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research 66 (2002) 312-323
39. Rogers R.D., and Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 (1995) 207-231
40. Ruthruff E., Miller J., and Lachmann T. Does mental rotation require central mechanisms?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 552-570
41. Schumacher E.H., Seymour T.L., Glass J.M., Fencsik D.E., Lauber E.J., Kieras D.E., and Meyer D.E. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science 12 2 (2001) 101-108
42. Shepard R.N., and Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171 (1971) 701-703
43. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 174-176
44. Stoet G., and Hommel B. Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1625-1640
45. Stroop J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1935) 643-662
46. Tombu M., and Jolicœur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 3-18
47. Van Selst M., and Jolicœur P. Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 905-921
48. Welford A.T. Single channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica 27 (1967) 5-22
49. Wickens C.D. Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman R., and Davies D.R. (Eds). Varieties of attention (1984), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 63-102
50. Wohlschläger A. Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements. Perception and Psychophysics 63 (2001) 709-718
51. Wohlschläger A., and Wohlschläger A. Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 397-412