Exploring the Diagnostic Utility of Facial Composites: Beliefs of Guilt Can Bias Perceived Similarity Between Composite and Suspect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 76-90

  Charman, Steve D ^a   Gregory, Amy Hyman ^a   Carlucci, Marianna ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

evidence; expectations; facial composites; similarity judgment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRIME; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; CRIME; CULTURE; FACE; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLICE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349150229     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014682     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. ACPO. (2000). National Working Practices in Facial Imaging. Association of Chief Police Officers (Scotland) Working Group, unpublished document.
2. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
3. Bem D.J. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 6 (1972), Academic Press, New York 1-62
4. Bradfield A.L., Wells G.L., and Olson E.A. The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002) 112-120
5. Bruce V. Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 73 (1982) 105-116
6. Bruce V., Burton M., and Hancock P. Remembering faces. In: Lindsay R.C.L., Ross D.F., Read J.D., and Toglia M.P. (Eds). Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 87-100
7. Bruner J.S., and Minturn A.L. Perceptual identification and perceptual organization. Journal of General Psychology 53 (1955) 21-28
8. Ceci S.J., and Bruck M. Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony (1995), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
9. Charman, S. D., Carlucci, M., & Hyman, A. (2009). Recanted feedback as a strategy to eliminate the post-identification feedback effect. Manuscript in preparation, FL International University, Miami.
10. Charman S.D., and Wells G.L. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 (2008) 5-20
11. Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2008b, March). Boosting eyewitnesses' identification confidence by adding dissimilar fillers: Examining the dud-alternative effect in lineups. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society, Jacksonville, FL.
12. Clark S.E. A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 (2003) 629-654
13. Darley J.M., and Gross P.H. A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1983) 20-33
14. Davies G., and Oldman H. The impact of character attribution on composite production: A real world effect?. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social 18 (1999) 128-139
15. Davies G., and Valentine T. Facial composites: Forensic utility and psychological research. In: Lindsay R.C.L., Ross D.F., Read J.D., and Toglia M.P. (Eds). Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 59-83
16. Dickson D.H., and Kelly I.W. The 'Barnum Effect' in personality assessment: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports 57 (1985) 367-382
17. Douglass A.B., and Steblay N. Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: A meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (2006) 859-869
18. Duncan B.L. Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34 (1976) 590-598
19. Ellis H., Shepherd J.W., and Davies G.M. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception 8 (1979) 431-439
20. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7 (1954) 117-140
21. Findley K.A., and Scott M.S. The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review 2 (2006) 291-397
22. Frowd C.D., Bruce V., McIntyre A., and Hancock P. The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. British Journal of Psychology 98 (2007) 61-77
23. Frowd C.D., Bruce V., McIntyre A., Ross D., Fields S., Plenderleith Y., et al. Implementing holistic dimensions for a facial composite system. Journal of Multimedia 1 (2006) 42-51
24. Frowd C.D., Bruce V., Ness H., Bowie L., Paterson J., Thomson-Bognar C., et al. Parallel approaches to composite production: Interfaces that behave contrary to expectation. Ergonomics 50 (2007) 562-585
25. Frowd C.D., Carson D., Ness H., McQuiston-Surrett D., Richardson J., Baldwin H., et al. Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Legal and Criminological Psychology 10 (2005) 63-81
26. Frowd C.D., McQuiston-Surrett D., Anandaciva S., Ireland C.E., and Hancock P.J.B. An evaluation of US systems for facial composite production. Ergonomics 50 (2007) 1987-1998
27. Gilovich T. How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life (1991), Free Press, New York
28. Greathouse S.M., and Kovera M.B. Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior 33 (2009) 70-82
29. Heine S.J., and Lehman D.R. Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997) 389-400
30. Hill H., and Bruce V. Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 986-1004
31. Hoch S.J., and Ha Y. Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1986) 221-233
32. Holyoak K.J., and Simon D. Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (1999) 3-31
33. Kassin S.M., Goldstein C.C., and Savitsky K. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior 27 (2003) 187-203
34. Kovera M.B., Penrod S.D., Pappas C., and Thill D.L. Identification of computer-generated facial composites. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997) 235-246
35. Kuehn L.L. Looking down a gun barrel: Person perception and violent crime. Perceptual & Motor Skills 39 (1974) 1159-1164
36. Lampinen J.M., Scott J., Pratt D., Leding J.K., and Arnal J.D. 'Good, you identified the suspect, but please ignore this feedback': Can warnings eliminate the effects of post-identification feedback?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (2007) 1037-1056
37. Lee L., Frederick S., and Ariely D. Try it, you'll like it: The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 1054-1058
38. Loftus E.F., Miller D.G., and Burns H.J. Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (1978) 19-31
39. Long G.M., and Toppino T.C. Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 130 (2004) 748-768
40. McQuiston-Surrett D., Douglass A., and Burkhardt S.G. Evaluation of facial composite evidence depends on the presence of other case factors. Legal and Criminological Psychology 13 (2008) 279-298
41. McQuiston-Surrett D., Topp L.D., and Malpass R.S. Use of facial composite systems in US law enforcement agencies. Psychology, Crime, & Law 12 (2006) 505-517
42. Meissner C.A., and Kassin S.M. "You're guilty, so just confess!" Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In: Lassiter G.D. (Ed). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (2004), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press Publishers, New York 85-106
43. Neil v. Biggers, 409 US 188 (1972).
44. Neuschatz J.S., Lawson D.S., Fairless A.H., Powers R.A., Neuschatz J.S., Goodsell C.A., and Toglia M.P. The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and on retrospective eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior 31 (2007) 231-247
45. Nickerson R.S. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many disguises. Review of General Psychology 2 (1998) 175-220
46. Petty R.E., and Wegener D.T. Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29 (1993) 137-165
47. Phillips M.R., McAuliff B.D., Kovera M.B., and Cutler B.L. Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999) 940-951
48. Pronin E., Gilovich T., and Ross L. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 781-799
49. Pronin E., Lin D.Y., and Ross L. The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002) 369-381
50. Roese N.J., and Sherman J.W. Expectancy. In: Kruglanski A.W., and Higgins E.T. (Eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2007), Guilford Press, New York 91-115
51. Roth M. Why police composites don't always hit mark. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (2007, March 25). http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07084/772371-84.stm Retrieved April 16, 2008, from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07084/772371-84.stm
52. Russano M.B., Dickinson J.J., Greathouse S.M., and Kovera M.B. "Why don't you take another look at number three?" Investigator knowledge and its effects on eyewitness confidence and identification decisions. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal 4 (2006) 355-379
53. Sagar H.A., and Schofield J.W. Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 590-598
54. Shepherd J.W., Ellis H.D., McMurran M., and Davies G.M. Effect of character attribution on Photofit construction of a face. European Journal of Social Psychology 8 (1978) 263-268
55. Simon, D., Pham, L. B., Le, Q. A., & Holyoak, K, J. The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1250-1260.
56. Simon D., Snow C.J., and Read S.J. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (2004) 814-837
57. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt S. (Ed). Sociological Methodology 1982 (1982), American Sociological Association, Washington DC 290-312
58. Stangor C., and McMillan D. Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992) 42-61
59. Stapel D.A., Martin L.L., and Schwarz N. The smell of bias: What instigates correction processes in social judgments?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (1998) 797-806
60. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. The holistic representation of faces. In: Peterson M.A., and Rhodes G. (Eds). Perception of faces, objects, and scenes (2003), Oxford University Press, New York 53-71
61. Tredoux C. A direct measure of facial similarity and its relation to human similarity perceptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 (2002) 180-193
62. Trope Y. Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 239-257
63. Wegener D.T., and Petty R.E. Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 5-15
64. Wells G.L., and Bradfield A.L. "Good. You identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1998) 360-376
65. Wells G.L., Charman S.D., and Olson E.A. Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (2005) 147-156
66. Wells G.L., and Hasel L.E. Facial composite production by eyewitnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (2007) 6-10
67. Wells G.L., and Olson E. Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 (2002) 155-167
68. Wilson T.D., and Brekke N. Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 117-142
69. Wilson T.D., Centerbar D.B., and Brekke N. Mental contamination and the debiasing problem. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahneman D. (Eds). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (2002), Cambridge University Press, New York 185-200
70. Wilson T.D., Lisle D.J., Kraft D., and Wetzel C.G. Preferences as expectation-driven inferences: Effects of affective expectations on affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1989) 519-530