Identification of computer-generated facial composites

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 235-246

  Kovera, Margaret Bull ^b   Pappas, Carolyn ^c   Thill, Debra L ^c   Penrod, Steven D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Florida International University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0031112996     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.235     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baenninger, M. A. (1994). The development of face recognition: Featural or configurational processing? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 377-396.
2. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.
3. Bond, N. W., & McConkey, K. M. (1995). Information retrieval: Reconstructing faces. In N. Brewer & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology and policing (pp. 101-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
5. Buehner, A., Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). G · Power: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for the Macintosh. Bonn University, Bonn, Germany.
6. Christie, D. F. M., Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Evaluating a new computer based system for face recall. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 201-218.
7. Christie, D. F. M., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Photofit constructions versus verbal descriptions of faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 358-363.
8. Cooper, C. (1992, April). To catch a thief: The hi-tech way in the '90's; detectives using software that draws composite sketches (Visatex Corp.'s CompuSketch; Trends and Technology; Product Announcement). Computer Shopper, 12, 143.
9. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281-290.
10. Cutler, B. L., Stocklein, C. J., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). An empirical examination of a computerized facial composite system. Forensic Reports, 1, 207-218.
11. Darnbrough, M. A. (1977). A survey on the use of Photofit in England and Wales. London: British Government Home Office, Crown Copyright.
12. Davies, G. (1981). Face recall systems. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 228-250). London: Academic Press.
13. Davies, G. (1986). Forensic face recall: The role of visual and verbal information. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological evidence and new perspectives (pp. 103-123). Chichester, England: Wiley.
14. Davies, G. M., & Christie, D. (1982). Face recall: An examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 103-109.
15. Davies, G. M., Ellis, H. D., & Christie, D. F. M. (1981). Exploring new strategies for facial recall. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 21, 137-145.
16. Davies, G., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Face identification: The influence of delay upon accuracy of photofit construction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 6, 35-42.
17. Deffenbacher, K. A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.
18. Ellis, H., Davies, G., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Remembering pictures of real and unreal faces: Some practical and theoretical considerations. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 467-474.
19. Ellis, H., Shepherd, J., & Davies, G. (1975). An investigation of the use of the Photofit technique for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 29-37.
20. Gibling, F., & Bennett, P. (1994). Artistic enhancement in the production of Photofit likenesses: An examination of its effectiveness in leading to suspect identification. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 1, 93-100.
21. Green, D. L., & Geiselman, R. E. (1989). Building composite facial images: Effects of feature saliency and delay of construction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 714-721.
22. Laughery, K. R., & Fowler, R. H. (1980). Sketch artist and Identi-kit procedures for recalling faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 307-316.
23. Laughery, K. R., & Smith, V. L. (1978, October). Suspect identification following exposure to sketches and Identikit composites. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Detroit, MI.
24. Leippe, M. R. (1980). Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 261-273.
25. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
26. Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & Rumpel, C. M. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situations? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79-89.
27. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43-57.
28. MacDonald, S. (1984, August 2). Wanted art: Meet a man who draws shady characters. The Wall Street Journal, pp. 1, 8
29. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482-489.
30. Mok, D. (1994, August 11). Software with a sharp eye for picking out faces. Business Times, p. 10.
31. Nosworthy, G. J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1990). Does nominal lineup size matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 358-361.
32. Patterson, K. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 406-417.
33. Pigott, M., & Brigham, J. C. (1985). Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 547-555.
34. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
35. Shaharazam, I. (1986). The Mac-a-Mug Pro manual. Milwaukee, WI: Shaharazam.
36. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225-245.
37. Thorwald, J. (1965). The mark of Cain. London: Thames and Hudson.
38. Travis, J. (1991, August 17). Gotcha! Criminal mugs captured in computer memory: "FacePrints," a program for rendering likenesses of criminal suspects. Science News, 140.
39. Victor, P. (1994, August 7). If the face fits . . . it's probably by computer. The Independent, p. 7.
40. Wells, G., & Horyciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory & Cognition, 12, 338-344.
41. Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.