The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-77

  Frowd, Charlie ^a   Bruce, Vicki ^b   McIntyre, Alex ^a   Hancock, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 33846975773     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712606X104481     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brace, N., Pike, G., & Kemp, R. (2000). Investigating E-FIT using famous faces. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska, & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law (pp. 272-276). Krakow, Poland: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.
2. Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116.
3. Bruce, V. (1988). Recognising faces. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
4. Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Miller, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339-360.
5. Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 207-218.
6. Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P. J. B., Newman, C., & Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one: Combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 894-902.
7. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1998). In the eye of the beholder: The science of face perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Bruck, M., Cavanagh, P., & Ceci, S. J. (1991). Fortysomething: Recognizing faces at one's 25th reunion. Memory and Cognition, 19, 221-228.
9. Burton, A. M., Wilson, S., Cowan, M., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243-248.
10. Campbell, R., Coleman, M., Walker, J., Benson, P. J., Wallace, S., Michelotti, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why? Visual Cognition, 6, 197-216.
11. Christie, D., Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Evaluating a new computer-based system for face recall. Law and Human Behaviour, 2, 209-218.
12. Cutler, B. L., Stocklein, C. J., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). An empirical examination of a computerized facial composite production system. Forensic Reports, 1, 207-218.
13. Davies, G. M., & Milne, A. (1982). Recognizing faces in and out of context. Current Psychological Research, 2, 235-246.
14. Davies, G. M., Milne, A., & Shepherd, J. W. (1983). Searching for operator skills in face composite reproduction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11, 405-409.
15. Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. (1978). Remembering faces: Acknowledging our limitations. Journal of Forensic Science, 18, 19-24.
16. Davies, G. M., van der Willik, P., & Morrison, L. J. (2000). Facial composite production: A comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 119-124.
17. de Haan, E. H., & Hay, D. (1986). The matching of famous and unknown faces, given either the internal or external features: A study on patients with unilateral brain lesions. In H. D. Ellis, F. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. W. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 302-309). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
18. Ellis, H., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431-439.
19. Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., Ness, H., Thomson-Bogner, C., Peterson, J., Mcintyre, A., & Hancock, P. J. B. (in press). Parallel approaches to composite production. Ergonomics.
20. Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., McQuiston, D., Richardson, J., Baldwin, H., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2005). Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 63-81.
21. Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., McLanaghan, S., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2005). A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychology, Crime and Law, 11, 33-52.
22. Frowd, C. D., Hancock, P. J. B., & Carson, D. (2004). EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Transactions on Applied Psychology (TAP), 1, 1-21.
23. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1986). Eyewitness memory enhancement with the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385-401.
24. Gibling, F., & Bennett, P. (1994). Artistic enhancement in the production of photofit likeness; an examination of its effectiveness in leading to suspect identification. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 93-100.
25. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330-337.
26. Henderson, Z., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 445-464.
27. Hill, H., & Bruce, V. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 986-1004.
28. Koehn, C. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1997). Constructing facial composites with the Mac-a-Mug Pro system. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 215-224.
29. Lee, K. L., & Perrett, D. I. (1997). Presentation-time measures of the effect of manipulations in colour space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception, 26, 733-752.
30. Memon, A., & Bruce, V. (1983). The effects of encoding strategy and context change on face recognition. Human Learning, 2, 313-326.
31. O'Donnell, C., & Bruce, V. (2001). Familiarisation with faces selectively enhances sensitivity to changes made to the eyes. Perception, 30, 755-764.
32. Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293.
33. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. D. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification rates. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
34. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). The faces that launched a thousand slips: Everyday difficulties in recognising people. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 495-523.
35. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737-746.
36. Wells, G. L., & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory and Cognition, 12, 338-344.
37. Wogalter, M., & Marwitz, D. (1991). Face composite construction: In view and from memory quality improvement with practice. Ergonomics, 22, 333-343.