Accuracy in planar cutting of bones: An ISO-based evaluation

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 77-84

  Cartiaux, Olivier ^a   Paul, Laurent ^a   Docquier, Pierre Louis ^a   Francq, Bernard G ^a   Raucent, Benoît ^a   Dombre, Etienne ^b   Banse, Xavier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b LIRMM   (France)

Author keywords

Accuracy evaluation; Bone cutting; Engineering methodology; Robotics; Surgical navigation

Indexed keywords

BONE; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ACCURACY EVALUATION; BONE CUTTING; ENGINEERING METHODOLOGY; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; EXPERIMENTAL TESTBED; GEOMETRICAL MODELS; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATIONS; ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION; THREE-LEVEL;

LOCATION;

ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; STANDARDIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; OSTEOTOMY; STANDARD;

POLYURETHAN;

BONE AND BONES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOTOMY; POLYURETHANES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 65349103984     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.237     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Taylor RH, Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 2003; 19(5): 765-781.
2. Siston RA, Giori NJ, Stuart BG, et al. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. J Biomech 2007; 40(4): 728-735.
3. Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(2): 188-197.
4. Wolf A, Jaramaz B, Lisien B, et al. MBARS: mini bone-attached robotic system for joint arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot 2005; 1(2): 101-121.
5. Plaskos C, Cinquin P, Lavallée S, et al. Praxiteles: a miniature bone-mounted robot for minimal access total knee arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot 2005; 1(4): 67-79.
6. Hankemeier S, Hüfner T, Wang G, et al. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14(10): 917-921.
7. Saragaglia D, Roberts J. Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthrisis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics 2005; 28(10): (suppl): s1269-1274.
8. Wang G, Zheng G, Keppler P, et al. Implementation, accuracy evaluation, and preliminary clinical trial of a CT-free navigation system for high tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10(2): 73-85.
9. Mayman DJ, Rudan J, Yach J, et al. The Kingston periacetabular osteotomy utilizing computer enhancement: a new technique. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7(3): 179-186.
10. Langlotz F, Stucki M, Bächler R, et al. The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 1998; 2(6): 317-326.
11. Langlotz F, Bächler R, Berlemann U, et al. Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 92-102.
12. Wong KC, Kumta SM, Chiu KH, et al. Computer assisted pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction with a custom-made prosthesis using an innovative adaptation and its validation. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12(4): 225-232.
13. Bast P, Popovic A, Wu T, et al. Robot- and computer-assisted craniotomy: resection planning, implant modelling and robot safety. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2006; 2(2): 168-178.
14. Hassfeld S, Mühling J. Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery - a review and an assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac 2001; 30(1): 2-13.
15. Krause WR. Orthopaedic cutting procedures. BONEZone 2003; 2: 4-10.
16. Shin HC, Yoon YS. Bone temperature estimation during orthopaedic round burr milling operations. J Biomech 2006; 39(1): 33-39.
17. Wallace RJ, Whitters CJ, McGeough JA, et al. Experimental evaluation of laser cutting of bone. J Mater Process Tech 2004; 149: 557-560.
18. Schwieger K, Carrero V, Rentzsch R, et al. Abrasive water jet cutting as a new procedure for cutting cancellous bone - in vitro testing in comparison with the oscillating saw. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71(2): 223-228.
19. Lanbanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, et al. Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.12.007.
20. Biant LC, Yeoh K, Walker PM, et al. The accuracy of bone resections made during computer navigated total knee replacement. Do we resect what the computer plans to resect? Knee 2008; DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.012.
21. Molfetta L, Caldo D. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 2008; 15(2): 75-79.
22. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Zuo JL, et al. Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(4): 935-945.
23. Delloye C, Banse X, Brichard B, et al. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(3): 579-587.
24. Toksvig-Larsen S, Ryd L. Surface flatness after bone cutting: a cadaver study of tibial condyles. Acta Orthop Scand 1991; 62(1): 15-18.
25. Barrera OA, Haider H, Garvin KL. Towards a standard in assessment of bone cutting for total knee replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008; 222(1): 63-74.
26. Stiehl JB, Bach J, Heck DA. Validation and metrology in CAOS. In Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery, Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM (eds). Springer: Heidelberg, 2007; 68-78.
27. ASTM. Standard WK5350. Standard Practice for Accuracy Measurement in Computer-assisted Orthopedic Surgery. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.
28. ISO. Standard 1101. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical Tolerancing - Tolerances of Form, Orientation, Location and Run-out. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004; www.iso.org.
29. Anselmetti B. Tolérancement - Cotation de Fabrication et Métrologie, vol 3. Lavoisier: Paris, 2003.
30. McDonald JH. Handbook of Biological Statistics. Sparky House Publishing: Baltimore, MD, 2008.
31. Schwartz D. Méthodes Statistiques à l'Usage des Médecins et des Biologistes, 4th edn. Flammarion Médecine-Sciences: Paris, 1993.
32. Armstrong RA, Eperjesi F, Gilmartin B. The application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to different experimental designs in optometry. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2002; 22(3): 248-256.
33. Belvedere C, Ensini A, Leardini A, et al. Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2007; 3(2): 117-124.
34. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, et al. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(1): 2-9.