Praxiteles: a miniature bone-mounted robot for minimal access total knee arthroplasty

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 67-79

  Plaskos, C ^a,b   Cinquin, P ^a   Lavallee S ^b   Hodgson, A J ^c  

^a LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

^b PRAXIM Medivision   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

bone milling; Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery; medical robotics; minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; robot aided surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; COPYRIGHTS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MILLING (MACHINING); ORTHOPEDICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

AXIS OF ROTATION; BONE CUTTING; BONE MILLING; COMPUTER-ASSISTED ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; MEDICAL ROBOTICS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; ROBOT ARCHITECTURE; ROBOT-AIDED SURGERY; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ROBOTS;

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MINIATURIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 33947267795     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.59     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB.Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994; 299: 153.
2. Laskin RS.Bone Resection Techniques in Total Knee Replacement. p. 55–74. In: Laskin RS, ed. Total Knee Replacement. Springer-Verlag London Limited, 1991.
3. Lennox DW, Cohn BT, Eschenroeder HC Jr.The effects of inaccurate bone cuts on femoral component position in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1988; 11: 257–60.
4. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen KB, McGraw RW.Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 698–705. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.33564
5. Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE.Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(S1): 2–8. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00291-2
6. Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM.Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop. 2003; 416: 185–90.
7. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M.Minimally invasive total knee arthoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86A(Suppl 2): 26–32.
8. Kienzle TC, Stulberg SD, Peshkin M, Quaid A, Lea J, Goswani A, Wu C.Total knee replacement –Computer-assisted surgical system uses a calibrated robot. IEEE Eng Med Biol. 1995; 301–6. doi:10.1109/51.391773
9. Ho SC, Hibberd RD, Davies BL.A force control strategy with active motion constraint for robot knee surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol. 1995; 292–300. doi: 10.1109/51.391774
10. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F.Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1998; 354: 49.
11. Jakopec M, Harris SL, Rodriguez y Baena F, Gomes P, Cobb J, Davies BL.
12. The first clinical application of a “hands-on” robotic knee surgery system. Comp Aid Surg. 2001; 6: 329–39. doi: 10.1002/igs.10023
13. Matsen FA, Garbini JL, Sidles JA, Pratt B, Baumgarten D, Kaiura R.Robot assistance in orthopaedic surgery: a proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993; 296: 178–86.
14. Davies BL, Harris SJ. Lin WJ, Hibberd RD, Middleton R, Cobb JC.
15. Active compliance in robotic surgery –the use of force control as a dynamic constraint. Proc Instn Mech Engrs. 1997; 211H: 285–92. doi: 10.1243/0954411971534403
16. Van Ham G.Machining and accuracy studies for a tibial knee implant using a force-controlled robot. Comp Aid Surg. 1998; 3: 123.
17. Borner M, Wiesel U, Ditzen W.Clinical Experiences with ROBODOC and the Duracon Total Knee. In: Stiehl, Konermann, Haaker, editors. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Springer Verlag; 2004. p. 362–6.
18. Ritschl P.The Galileo System for implantation of Total Knee Arthroplasty –An Integrated Solution Comprising Navigation, Robotics and Robot-Assisted Ligament Balancing. In: Stiehl, Konermann, Haaker, editors. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Springer.-Verlag; 2004. p. 281–361.
19. rd annual meeting of the International Society for Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. 2003; 28–9.
20. Wolf A, Jaramaz B, Lisien B, DiGioia AM.MBARS: mini bone-attached robotic system for joint arthroplasty. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Aided Surgery. 2005; 1: 101–21. doi: 10.1581/mrcas.2005.010210
21. Shoham M, Burman M, Zehavi E, Joskowicz L, Batkilin E, Kunicher Y.Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: concept and clinical applications. IEEE Trans Rob and Autom. 2003; 19: 893–901. doi: 10.1109/TRA.2003.817075
22. th Annual Meeting of CAOS-International Proceedings; 2004. p. 67–8.
23. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Lavallée S, Cinquin P.Optimal kinematic design and positioning of a small surgical robot for the knee. Surgetica Conference. January 2005. Cambery, France.
24. Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P, Plaweski S, Dubrana F, Lefevre C, Troccaz J.Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comp Aid Surg. 2002; 7: 156–68. doi: 10.1002/igs.10042