Heterodox economics, social capital, and HRD: Moving beyond the limits of the neoclassical paradigm

Human Resource Development Review

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 97-119

  Storberg Walker, Julia ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Heterodox Economics; HRD Theory; Social Capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 65249088424     PISSN: 15344843     EISSN: 15526712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534484309332616     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Adler, P., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 29, 17-40.
2. Arrow, K.J. (1994, May). Richard T. Ely lecture: Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, May, 1-9.
3. Arrow, K.J. (2000). Three Nobel laureates on the state of economics: Interviews with Robert Solow, Kenneth Arrow, and Amaryta Sen. Challenge, 43, 6-31.
4. Arrow, K.J. (2001). The five most significant developments in economics of the twentieth century. European Journal of Economic Thought, 8, 298-304.
5. Association for Heterodox Economics. (n.d.). Retrieved December 30, 2008, from http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/hetecon/societies.htm
6. Becker, G.S. (1963). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Borgatti, S.P. & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991-1013.
8. Chou, Y.K. (2006). Three simple models of social capital and economic growth. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 889-912.
9. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
10. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social network: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Fine, B., & Green, F. (2000). Economics, social capital, and the colonization of the social sciences. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives. London: Oxford University Press.
12. French, W.L. & Bell, C.H. (2000). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Garcia, S.K. (2007). Developing social network propositions to explain large group intervention theory and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 341-358.
14. Garnett, R.F. (2006). Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics. Review of Political Economy, 18, 521-546.
15. Granovetter, M.S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
16. Hall, R.E., & Jones, C.I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others ? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83-116.
17. Harrison, R., & Kessels, J. (2004). Human resource development in a knowledge economy: An organisational view. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Hodgeson, G.M. (2006). Characterizing institutional and heterodox economics: A reply to Tony Lawson. Evolutionary Institutional Economics Review, 2, 213-223.
19. Kaplan, G.A., Pamuk, E.R., Lynch, J.W., Cohen, R.D., & Balfour, J.L. (1996). Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: Analysis of mortality and potential pathways. British Medical Journal, 312, 999-1003.
20. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B.P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1491-1498.
21. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251-1288.
22. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lawson, T. (2006). The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 483-505.
24. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Morris, M.M., McMillan, H., & Storberg-Walker, J. (in press). Developing an OD intervention metric system using applied theory building methodology: A work/life intervention example. Paper to be presented at the 2009 Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas, Washington, DC.
26. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
27. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
28. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320-1350.
29. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
30. Sen, A. (2000). Three Nobel laureates on the state of economics: Interviews with Robert Solow, Kenneth Arrow, and Amartya Sen. Challenge, 43, 6-31.
31. Solow, R. (2000). Three Nobel laureates on the state of economics: Interviews with Robert Solow, Kenneth Arrow, and Amartya Sen. Challenge, 43, 6-31.
32. Storberg, J. (2002). The evolution of capital theory: A review of a theory of social capital and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 468-499.
33. Storberg-Walker, J. (2007). Borrowing from others: Appropriating social capital theories for "Doing" HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9:312-340.
34. Storberg-Walker, J., & Gubbins, C. (2007). Social networks as a conceptual and empirical tool to understand and "do" HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 291-311.
35. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151-208.
36. Wrenn, M.V. (2006 a). Agency and mental models in heterodox economics. Journal of economic issues, 40, 483-491.
37. Wrenn, M.V. (2006 b). On the nature of heterodox economics: A survey study. History of Economics Review, 43, 123-145.