Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics

Review of Political Economy

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 521-546

  Garnett Jr , Robert F ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750220972     PISSN: 09538259     EISSN: 14653982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09538250600915725     Document Type: Review

References (127)

1. Amariglio, J., Callari, A., Resnick, S., Ruccio, D. & Wolff, R. (1996) Nondeterminist Marxism: the birth of a postmodern tradition in economics, in: F. Foldvary (Ed.), Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, pp. 134-147 (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar).
2. American Association of University Professors (1940) Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure (Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors).
3. American Association of University Professors (1987) Statement on Professional Ethics (Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors).
4. Ancochea, D. S. (2004) Building a successful heterodox graduate program in economics: an impossible task?, New School Economic Review, 1(1), pp. 11-20.
5. Backhouse, R. E. (1994) Pluralism and The Economic Journal, History of Economics Ideas, 2(3), pp. 109-117.
6. Backhouse, R. E. (1998) Should economics embrace postmodernism?, in: R. E. Backhouse, Explorations in Economic Methodology, pp. 134-145 (London: Routledge).
7. Backhouse, R. E. (2000) Progress in heterodox economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 149-155.
8. Backhouse, R. E. (2001) On the credentials of methodological pluralism, in: J. E. Biddle, J. B. Davis & S. G. Medema (Eds) Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels, pp. 161-181(London: Routledge).
9. Barker, D. K. & Feiner, S. F. (2004) Liberating Economics: Feminist Perspectives on Families, Work, and Globalization (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
10. Bernstein, M. A. (1999) Economic knowledge, professional authority, and the state, in: R. F. Garnett, Jr. (Ed.), What Do Economists Know?, pp. 103-123(London: Routledge).
11. Boettke, P. J. & Prychitko, D. L. (Eds) (1994) The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar).
12. Burczak, T. (forthcoming) Hayek, Sen, and social justice, in: R. Garnett & J. Harvey (Eds) Future Directions for Heterodox Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
13. Cambridge 27 (2003) Opening up economics, in: E. Fullbrook (Ed.) (2003) The Crisis in Economics. The Post-Autistic Economics Movement: The First 600 Days, pp. 36-38 (London: Routledge).
14. Coats, A. W. (2000) The progress of heterodox economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 145-148.
15. Colander, D. (2000) The death of neoclassical economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 127-143.
16. Colander, D., Holt, R. P. F. & Rosser, J. B., Jr. (2004) The changing face of mainstream economics, Review of Political Economy, 16, pp. 485-499.
17. Cullenberg, S. (1992) Socialism's burden: toward a thin definition of socialism, Rethinking Marxism, 5(2), pp. 64-83.
18. Cullenberg, S., Amariglio, J. & Ruccio, D. (Eds) (2001) Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge (London: Routledge).
19. Davidson, P. (2002) Post Keynesian thought listserv [http://csf.colorado. edu/pkt], August 23.
20. Davidson, P. (2003a) Post Keynesian thought listserv [http://csf. colorado.edu/pkt], March 5.
21. Davidson, P. (2003b) Post Keynesian thought listserv [http://csf. colorado.edu/pkt], March 6.
22. Davidson, P. (2004) A response to King's arguments for pluralism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 24, March 15.
23. Davis, J. B. (1994) Pluralism in social economics, History of Economics Ideas, 2(3), pp. 119-128.
24. Davis, J. B. (1999) Postmodernism and identity conditions for discourses, in: R. F. Garnett, Jr. (Ed.) What Do Economists Know?, pp. 155-168 (London: Routledge).
25. Davis, J. B. (2002) The emperor's clothes, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24(2), pp. 141-154.
26. Davis, J. B. (2003) The Theory of the Individual in Economics (London: Routledge).
27. Davis, J. B. (forthcoming) Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream, and embedded individual analysis, in: R. Garnett & J. Harvey (Eds) Future Directions for Heterodox Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
28. Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value (New York: Wiley).
29. DeMartino, G. F. (2003) Realizing class justice, Rethinking Marxism, 15(1), pp. 1-32.
30. Desai, M. (1979) Marxian Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
31. Dolan, E. G. (1976) Austrian economics as extraordinary science, in: E. G. Dolan (Ed.) The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, pp. 3-18 (Kansas City: Sheed & Ward).
32. Donovan, G. (2004) Economics split divides Notre Dame, National Catholic Reporter, April 9.
33. Dow, S. C. (1997) Methodological pluralism and pluralism of method, in: A. Salanti & E. Screpanti (Eds) Pluralism in Economics, pp. 89-104 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
34. Dow, S. C. (2000) Prospects for the progress in heterodox economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 157-170.
35. Dow, S. C. (2001) The relevance of controversies for practice as well as teaching, Post-Autistic Economics Newsletter, 6 (May).
36. Dow, S. C. (2004a) Reorienting economics: some epistemological issues, Journal of Economics Methodology, 11(3), pp. 307-312.
37. Dow, S. C. (2004b) Structured pluralism, Journal of Economics Methodology, 11(3), pp. 275-290.
38. Dow, S. C. (forthcoming) The future for schools of thought in a pluralist economics, in: R. Garnett & J. Harvey (Eds) Future Directions for Heterodox Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
39. Earl, P. E. (2002) The perils of pluralistic teaching and how to reduce them, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 11 (January).
40. Eichner, A. (1979) A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics (White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe).
41. Evensky, J. (1993) Ethics and the invisible hand, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), pp. 197-205.
42. Ferber, M. A. & Nelson, J. A. (2003) Feminist Economics Today: Beyond Economic Man (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
43. Feiner, S. F. (2002) Toward a post-autistic economics education, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 12 (March).
44. Foss, N. J. & Loasby, B. J. (1998) Introduction: co-ordination and capabilities, in: N. J. Foss & B. J. Loasby (Eds) Economic Organization, Capabilities, and Co-Ordination, pp. 1-13 (London: Routledge).
45. Fullbrook, E. (2001) Real science is pluralist, Post-Autistic Economics Newsletter, 5 (March).
46. Fullbrook, E. (Ed.) (2003) The Crisis in Economics. The Post-Autistic Economics Movement: The First 600 Days (London: Routledge).
47. Fullbrook, E. (2005) The Rand portcullis and PAE, Post-Autistic Economics Newsletter, 32 (July).
48. Fuller, S. (2000) Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
49. Fusfeld, D. R. (1998) Economics and the Cold War: an inquiry into the relationship between ideology and theory, Journal of Economic Issues, 32(2), pp. 505-511.
50. Garnett, R. (2004) Rhetoric and postmodernism in economics, in: J. Davis, A. Marciano & J. Runde (Eds) Elgar Companion on Economics and Philosophy, pp. 231-259 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
51. Gibson-Graham, J.-K. (1996) The End of Capitalism (as we knew it) (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell).
52. Goodwin, C. D. (2000) Comment: it's the homogeneity, stupid!, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 179-184.
53. Gutting, G. (Ed.) (1980) Paradigms and Revolutions (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
54. Hahn, F. H. & Brechling, F. P. R. (Eds) (1965) The Theory of Interest Rates (London: Macmillan).
55. Hargreaves-Heap, S. (2001) Postmodernism, rationality, and justice, in: S. Cullenberg, J. Amariglio & D.Ruccio (Eds), Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge, pp. 354-373 (London:Routledge).
56. Hausman, D. M. & McPherson, M. S. (1988) Standards, Economics and Philosophy, 4, pp. 1-7.
57. Havel, V. (1992) The end of the modern era, The New York Times, Sunday, March 1, p. 15.
58. Hayek, F. A. (1944) The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
59. Hermann-Pillath, C. (2001) On the ontological foundations of evolutionary economics, in: K. Dopfer (Ed.), Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, pp. 89-140 (Boston: Kluwer Academic).
60. Hewitson, G. J. (1999) Feminist Economics: Interrogating the Masculinity of Rational Economic Man (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
61. Hill, M. T. (2003) Development as empowerment, Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 117-135.
62. Hodgson, G. M. (1995) The political economy of Utopia, Review of Social Economy, 53(2), pp. 195-213.
63. Hodgson, G. M. (1998) Economics and Utopia: Why the Learning Economy is Not the End of History (London, Routledge).
64. Hodgson, G. M. (2002) Visions of mainstream economics: a response to Richard Nelson & Jack Vromen, Review of Social Economy, 60(1), pp. 125-133.
65. Hodgson, G. M. (2005) Introduction, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), pp. i-ii.
66. Hoksbergen, R. (1994) Postmodernism and institutionalism: toward a resolution of the debate on relativism, Journal of Economic Issues, 28(3), pp. 679-713.
67. Hutchison, T. (1992) Changing Aims in Economics (Oxford: Blackwell).
68. King, J. E. (2002) Three arguments for pluralism, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50, pp. 82-88.
69. King, J. E. (2004) A defense of King' argument(s) for pluralism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 25, March 18.
70. Kirzner, I. (1976) Philosophical and ethical implications of Austrian economics, in: E. G. Dolan (Ed.) The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, pp. 75-88 (Kansas City, Sheed & Ward).
71. Klamer, A. (2001) Late modernism and the loss of character in economics, in: S. Cullenberg, J. Amariglio & D. Ruccio (Eds), Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge, pp. 77-101 (London: Routledge).
72. Klamer, A. & McCloskey, D. N. (1989) The rhetoric of disagreement, Rethinking Marxism, 2, pp. 140-161.
73. Klein, D. B. (Ed.) (1999) What Do Economists Contribute? (New York: New York University Press).
74. Kregel, J. (1975) The Reconstruction of Political Economy: An Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics (London: Macmillan).
75. Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
76. Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
77. Kurz, H. D. & Salvadori, N. (2000) On critics and protective belts, in: H. Kurz & N. Salvadori (Eds), Understanding 'Classical' Economics: Studies in Long-Period Theory, pp. 235-258 (London: Routledge).
78. Lavoie, D. (1994) A political philosophy for the market process, in: P. Boettke & D. Prychitko (Eds) The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics, pp. 274-286 (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar).
79. Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality (London: Routledge).
80. Lawson, T. (2003) Reorienting Economics (London: Routledge).
81. Lee, F. S. (2002) The Association for Heterodox Economics: past, present, and future, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50, pp. 29-43.
82. Lee, F. S. (2004) To be a heterodox economist: the contested landscape of American economics, 1960s and 1970s, Journal of Economic Issues, 38(3), pp. 747-763.
83. Lee, F. S. (2005a) The ranking game and the scholarly corruption of mainstream economics. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Kansas City.
84. Lee, F. S. (2005b) Research assessment exercise, the state, and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Kansas City.
85. Lee, F. S. & Keen, S. (2004) The incoherent emperor: a heterodox critique of neoclassical microeconomic theory, Review of Social Economy, 62(2), pp. 169-199.
86. Lee, M. (2003) The Harvard petition: alternative to Ec 10. Unpublished manuscript, Students for a Humane and Responsible Economics, Cambridge, MA.
87. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1975) An equilibrium model of the business cycle, Journal of Political Economy, 83, pp. 1113-1144.
88. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1976) Economic policy evaluation: a critique, Journal of Monetary Economics, 1, pp. 19-46.
89. Madison, G. B. (1994) Hermeneutical integrity: a guide for the perplexed, in: P. J. Boettke & Prychitko, D. L. (Eds) The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics, pp. 201-211 (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar).
90. McCloskey, D. N. (1994) Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
91. McCloskey, D. N. (1998) [1985] The Rhetoric of Economics, 2nd edn (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).
92. McCloskey, D. N. (2001) The genealogy of postmodernism: an economist's guide, in: S. Cullenberg, J. Amariglio & D. Ruccio (Eds) Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge, pp. 102-128 (London: Routledge).
93. McCloskey, D. N. (2003) Notre Dame loses, Eastern Economic Journal, 29(2), pp. 309-315.
94. McIntyre, R. (2003) Revolutionizing French economics: an interview with Gilles Raveaud, Challenge, 46(6), pp. 110-130.
95. Mill, J.S. (2001) [1859] On Liberty (London: Electric Book Company).
96. Mirowski, P. (2002) Machine Dreams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
97. Mirowski, P. & Sent, E.-M. (Eds) (2002) Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
98. Morgan, M. S. & Rutherford, M. (Eds) (1998) From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (Durham: Duke University Press).
99. Nelson, R. H. (1991) Reaching for Heaven on Earth: The Theological Meaning of Economics (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
100. Nussbaum, M. C. (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice, Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 33-59.
101. Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2001) Critical Thinking (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).
102. Potts, J. (2000) The New Evolutionary Microeconomics (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
103. Pressman, S. & Summerfield, G. (2000) The economic contributions of Amartya Sen, Review of Political Economy, 12(1), pp. 89-113.
104. Ramstad, Y. (1989) 'Reasonable value' versus 'instrumental value': competing paradigms in institutionalist economics, Journal of Economic Issues, 23(3), pp. 761-777.
105. Ramstad, Y. (1995) John R. Commons's puzzling inconsequentiality as an economic theorist, Journal of Economic Issues, 29(4), pp. 991-1012.
106. Resnick, S. & Wolff, R. (1988) Marxian theory and the rhetorics of economics, in: A. Klamer, D. N. McCloskey & R. M. Solow (Eds) The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 47-63.
107. Rorty, A. O. (1983) Experiments in philosophic genre: Descartes' meditations, Critical Inquiry, 9, pp. 545-565.
108. Rutherford, M. (2000) The prospects of heterodox economics: a comment, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 185-188.
109. Salanti, A. & Screpanti, E. (Eds) (1997) Pluralism in Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
110. Samuels, W. J. (1997) The case for methodological pluralism, in: A. Salanti & E. Screpanti (Eds) Pluralism in Economics, 67-88 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
111. Samuelson, P. A. (1964) Economics: An Introductory Analysis, 6th edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).
112. Sargent, T. J. & Wallace, N. (1975) Rational expectations, the optimal monetary instrument, and the optimal money supply rule, Journal of Political Economy, 83, pp. 241-255.
113. Sawyer, M. C. (1989) The Challenge of Radical Political Economy (Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble Books).
114. Seabright, P. (1993) Pluralism and the standard of living, in: M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
115. Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
116. Sen, A. (2004) Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation, Feminist Economics, 10(3), pp. 77-80.
117. Sent, E.-M. (2003) Pleas for pluralism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, 18 (February 4).
118. Sent, E.-M. (forthcoming) Pluralisms in economics, in: S. Kellert, H. Longino & K. Waters (Eds) Scientific Pluralism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
119. Sherman, H. J. (1987) Foundations of Radical Political Economy (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe).
120. Steedman, I. (1977) Marx After Sraffa (London: New Left Books).
121. Stein, H. (1996) The Fiscal Revolution in America, 2nd revised edn (Washington, DC: AEI Press).
122. Students for Academic Freedom (2002) The Academic Bill of Rights (Washington, DC: Students for Academic Freedom).
123. Sweezy, P. & Magdoff, H. (1988) Marxism in America: The Monthly Review experience (an interview by Michael Hillard & Claude Misukiewicz), Rethinking Marxism, 1(1), pp. 87-107.
124. Walsh, V. (2000) Smith after Sen, Review of Political Economy, 12(1), pp. 5-25.
125. Weintraub, E. R. (2002) How Economics Became a Mathematical Science (Durham: Duke University Press).
126. Worland, S. T. (1972) Radical political economy as a 'scientific revolution', Southern Economic Journal, 39(2), pp. 274-284.
127. Zweig, M. (1971) Bourgeois and radical paradigms in economics, Review of Radical Political Economics, 3(2), pp. 43-58.