Spatial updating in superimposed real and virtual environments

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 42-51

  Wan, Xiaoang Irene ^a   Wang, Ranxiao Frances ^a   Crowell, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONCEPT FORMATION; EGO; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; KINESTHESIA; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; KINESTHESIS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; REALITY TESTING; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 64749114165     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.1.42     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amorim, M.-A., Glasauer, S., Corpinot, K., & Berthoz, A. (1997). Updating an object's orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: A comparison between two processing modes. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 404-418.
2. Avraamides, M. N. (2003). Spatial updating of environments described in texts. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 402-431.
3. Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., & Passenier, P. O. (1999). The effects of proprioceptive and visual feedback on geographical orientation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8, 36-53.
4. Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7, 168-178.
5. de Vega, M., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labeling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 369-393.
6. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 483-500.
7. Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R., & Seguinot, V. (1996). Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 201-209.
8. Farrell, M. J., Arnold, P., Pettifer, S., Adams, J., Graham, T., & MacManamon, M. (2003). Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 219-227.
9. Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 227-233.
10. Farrell, M. J., & Thomson, J. A. (1998). Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 637-654.
11. Grant, S. C., & Magee, L. E. (1998). Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments. Human Factors, 40, 489-497.
12. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 262-271.
13. Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 109-112.
14. Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory & Cognition, 13, 208-217.
15. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293-298.
16. Lathrop, W. B., & Kaiser, M. K. (2002). Perceiving orientation in physical and virtual environments: Changes in perceived orientation as a function of idiothetic information available. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11, 19-32.
17. Loomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 113-119.
18. Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 557-564.
19. May, M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 169-186.
20. McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 87-121.
21. Mittelstaedt, M.-L., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1980). Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaften, 67, 566-567.
22. Müller, M., & Wehner, R. (1988). Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 85, 5287-5290.
23. Müller, M., & Wehner, R. (1994). The hidden spiral: Systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 175, 525-530.
24. Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., & Williams, G. (1997). Quantifying immersion in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 13-18). New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
25. Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotation and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447-1455.
26. Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., & Zanforlin, M. (1995). Detour behaviour in the domestic chick: Searching for a disappearing prey or a disappearing social partner. Animal Behaviour, 50, 203-211.
27. Riecke, B. E., Cunningham, D. W., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research, 71, 298-313.
28. Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Spatial updating in real and virtual environments: Contribution and interaction of visual and vestibular cues. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 9-17). New York: ACM Press.
29. Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 183-215.
30. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
31. Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helme-tmounted and desk-top displays? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8, 157-168.
32. Schmidt, I., Collett, T. S., Dillier, F.-X., & Wehner, R. (1992). How desert ants cope with enforced detours on their way home. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 171, 285-288.
33. Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 120-126.
34. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
35. Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422-437.
36. von Saint Paul, U. (1982). Do geese use path integration for walking home? In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.), Avian navigation (pp. 298-307). New York: Springer.
37. Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1051-1063.
38. Wang, R. F. (2004). Between reality and imagination: When is spatial updating automatic? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 68-76.
39. Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003a). Human navigation in nested environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 398-404.
40. Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003b). Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 981-986.
41. Wang, R. F., Crowell, J. A., Simons, D. J., Irwin, D. E., Kramer, A. F., Ambinder, M. S., et al. (2006). Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: Effects of the number of objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 281-286.
42. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191-210.
43. Wehner, R., & Srinivasan, M. V. (1981). Searching behavior of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology, 142, 315-338.
44. Williams, B., Narasimham, G., Westerman, C., Rieser, J., & Bodenheimer, B. (2007). Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4, 1-22.
45. Wraga, M., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2004). Spatial updating of virtual displays during self- and display rotation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 399-415.