A multistream model of visual word recognition

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 281-296

  Allen, Philip A ^a   Smith, Albert F ^b   Lien, Mei Ching ^c   Kaut, Kevin P ^a   Canfield, Angie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 64749089372     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.2.281     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133-176.
2. Allen, P. A., & Emerson, P. L. (1991). Holism revisited: Evidence for parallel independent word-level and letter-level processors during word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 489-511.
3. Allen, P. A., & Madden, D. J. (1990). Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 48-64.
4. Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Weber, T. A., & Groth, K. E. (1993). Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. Psychology & Aging, 8, 274-282.
5. Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Groth, K. E., Pickle, J. L., Grabbe, J. W., & Madden, D. J. (2002). Differential age effects for case and hue mixing in visual word recognition. Psychology & Aging, 17, 622-635.
6. Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Lien, M.-C., Grabbe, J., & Murphy, M. D. (2005). Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 713-721.
7. Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Lien, M.-C., Weber, T. A., & Madden, D. J. (1997). Word frequency effects at brief exposure durations: Comment on Paap and Johansen (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1792-1797.
8. Allen, P. A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T. A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 914-934.
9. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9, 238-240.
10. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
11. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449-454.
12. Bush, A. L. H., Allen, P. A., Kaut, K. P., & Ogrocki, P. K. (2007). Influence of mild cognitive impairment on visual word recognition. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 14, 329-352.
13. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 220-242.
15. Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 102-104.
16. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
17. De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1990). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Dobkins, K. R., Gunther, K. L., & Peterzell, D. H. (2000). What covariance mechanisms underlie green/red equiluminance, luminance contrast sensitivity and chromatic (green/red) contrast sensitivity? Vision Research, 40, 613-628.
19. Gervais, M. J., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Roberts, J. O. (1984). Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 655-666.
20. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
21. Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 235-242.
22. Humphreys, G. W., Mayall, K., & Cooper, A. C. G. (2003). The PIG in sPrInG: Evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 939-946.
23. Jordan, T. R. (1990). Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 893-909.
24. Jordan, T. R. (1995). Perceiving exterior letters of words: Differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 512-530.
25. Jordan, T. R., & Bevan, K. M. (1994). Word superiority over isolated letters: The neglected case of forward masking. Memory & Cognition, 22, 133-144.
26. Jordan, T. R., & Bevan, K. M. (1996). Position-specific masking and the word-letter phenomenon: Reexamining the evidence from the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1416-1433.
27. Jordan, T. R., Sherman, S. M., & Tonkin, R. P. (2007). Constructing isoluminant stimuli for word recognition research: A precautionary study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 494-501.
28. Jordan, T. R., Thomas, S. M., Patching, G. R., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 883-893.
29. Kelly, D. H. (1979). Motion and vision: II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1340-1349.
30. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
31. Kveraga, K., Boshyan, J., & Bar, M. (2007). Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 13232-13240.
32. Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading: I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239-252.
33. Lehmkuhle, S., Garzia, R. P., Turner, L., Hash, T., & Baro, J. A. (1993). A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 989-996.
34. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596-9601.
35. Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468.
36. 15O PET. NeuroImage, 3, 127-142.
37. Mayall, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the tasksensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 278-294.
38. Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., Mechelli, A., Olson, A., & Price, C. J. (2001). The effects of case mixing on word recognition: Evidence from a PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 844-853.
39. Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1275-1286.
40. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
41. Merigan, W. H., Byrne, C. E., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1991). Does primate motion perception depend on the magnocellular pathway? Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 3422-3429.
42. Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369-402.
43. O'Brien, B. A., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (2000). The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia. Vision Research, 40, 1921-1935.
44. Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D. C., & Vanduffel, W. (2004). Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 315-324.
45. Parish, D. H., & Sperling, G. (1991). Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination. Vision Research, 31, 1399-1415.
46. Patching, G. R., & Jordan, T. R. (2005). Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers. Memory & Cognition, 33, 961-971.
47. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP1 model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
48. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science, 249, 1041-1044.
49. Peterzell, D. H., & Teller, D. Y. (2000). Spatial frequency tuned co-variance channels for red-green and luminance-modulated gratings: Psychophysical data from human adults. Vision Research, 40, 417-430.
50. Pillsbury, W. B. (1897). A study in apperception. American Journal of Psychology, 8, 315-393.
51. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
52. Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590.
53. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
55. Schiller, P. H., Logothetis, N. K., & Charles, E. R. (1991). Parallel pathways in the visual system: Their role in perception at isoluminance. Neuropsychologia, 29, 433-441.
56. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
57. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
58. Skottun, B. C. (2000). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 40, 111-127.
59. Skottun, B. C. (2001). Is dyslexia caused by a visual deficit? Vision Research, 41, 3069-3070.
60. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 15, 225-231.
61. Van Essen, D. C., & Anderson, C. H. (1995). Information processing strategies and pathways in the primate visual system. In S. F. Zornetzer, J. L. Davis, C. Lau, & T. McKenna (Eds.), An introduction to neural and electronic networks (2nd ed., pp. 45-76). San Diego: Academic Press.
62. Van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Felleman, D. J. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science, 255, 419-423.
63. Van Essen, D. C., & DeYoe, E. A. (1995). Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 383-400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.
65. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1131-1161.