The PIG in SPrInG: Evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 939-946

  Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Mayall, Kate ^b   Cooper, Adam C G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842636284     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196555     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BESNER, D., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the interaction of visual, orthographic, phonological and lexical information. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and processes (pp. 291-316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. BESNER, D., & McCANN, R. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 201-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. CARR, T. H., & POLLATSEK, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and in practice V (pp. 1-82). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
4. CATTELL, J. M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 220-242, 377-392.
5. COLTHEART, M., & FREEMAN, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 102-104.
6. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
7. FREDERIKSEN, J. R., & KROLL, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 361-379.
8. HODSOLL, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2001). Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 918-926.
9. KUMADA, T., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2001). Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 465-478.
10. LABERGE, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 371-379.
11. MACLEOD, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The gold standard of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 12-14.
12. MAYALL, K. [A.], & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the task sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 278-294.
13. MAYALL, K. A., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & OLSON, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1275-1286.
14. MCCANN, R. S., & BESNER, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 14-24.
15. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
16. PATTERSON, K. E., & COLTHEART, V. (1987). Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 421-447). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. REICHER, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274-280.
18. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
19. SMITH, F. (1969). Familiarity of configuration vs discriminability of features in the visual identification of words. Psychonomic Science, 14, 261-263.
20. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland. [Acta psychologica, 30, 276-315.]
21. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland. [Acta psychologica, 30, 276-315.]
22. WEEKES, B. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.
23. WHEELER, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.