Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 278-294

  Mayall, Kate ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030553956     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.278     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133-176.
2. Allen, P. A., & Emerson, P. L. (1991). Holism revisited: Evidence for parallel independent word-level and letter-level processors during word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 489-511.
3. Allen, P. A., & Madden, D. J. (1990). Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 48-64.
4. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
5. Besner, D. (1983). Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 429-438.
6. Besner, D. (1990). Does the reading system need a lexicon? In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Reading comprehension processes (pp. 73-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Besner, D., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the interaction of visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical information. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical processes and representation (pp. 291-316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Besner, D., & McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 201-219). London: Erlbaum.
9. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 277-282, 524-538.
10. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-215). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Evett, L., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.
13. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 12, 627-635.
14. Frederiksen, J. R. (1978). Assessment of perceptual decoding and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp. 153-169). New York: Plenum.
15. Haber, L. R., Haber, R. N., & Furlin, K. R. (1983). Word length and word shape as sources of information in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 165-189.
16. Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. S. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 8, 689-740.
17. Kinoshita, S. (1987). Case alternation effect: Two types of word recognition? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39(A), 701-720.
18. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
19. Mason, M. (1978). From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity. Memory & Cognition, 6, 568-581.
20. Mayall, K. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (in press). A connectionist model of alexia: Covert recognition and case mixing effects. British Journal of Psychology.
21. McClelland, J. L. (1976). Preliminary letter recognition in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 80-91.
22. McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 221-224.
23. Mewhort, D. J. K., & Johns, E. E. (1988). Some tests of the interactive-activation model for word identification. Psychological Research, 50, 135-147.
24. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). The effects of frequency upon visual word recognition: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
25. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shapes in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413-428.
26. Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units: Reality and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 573-578.
27. Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
28. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropychology, 4, 131-185.
29. Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic receding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10, 645-657.
30. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (pp. 318-364). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
32. Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth in reading: Equitable division of labour. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 85-118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
34. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 383-404.
35. Smith, F. (1969). Familiarity of configuration vs. discriminability of features in the visual identification of words. Psychonomic Science, 14, 261-262.
36. Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635-657.
37. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1979). Semantic access dyslexia. Brain, 102, 43-63.