Behavioral indications of object-presence in haptic virtual environments

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 183-186

  Reiner, Miriam ^a   Hecht, David ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DEVICE; EMOTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FORCE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; OBJECT RELATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; TOUCH; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

AWARENESS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REALITY TESTING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64749086561     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0141     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Stanney KM, Mourant RR, Kennedy RS. Human factors issues in virtual environments: a review of the literature. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1998; 7:327-51.
2. Holden M. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2005; 8:187-211.
3. Satava RM. Historical review of surgical simulation - a personal perspective. World Journal of Surgery 2008; 32:141-8.
4. Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005; 6:332-9.
5. Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, Smith S, et al. A controlled study of virtual reality exposure therapy for the fear of flying. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 2000; 68:1020-6.
6. Emmelkamp PM, Krijn M, Holsbosch AM, et al. Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behavior Research & Therapy 2002; 40:509-16.
7. Garcia-Palacios A, Hoffman H, Carlin A, et al. Virtual reality in the treatment of spider phobia: a controlled study. Behavior Research & Therapy 2002; 40:983-93.
8. Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, Anderson PL, et al. Twelve-month follow-up of virtual reality and standard exposure therapies for the fear of flying. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 2002; 70:428-32.
9. Hoffman HG, Garcia-Palacios A, Carlin A, et al. Interfaces that heal: coupling real and virtual objects to treat spider phobia. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 2003; 16:283-300.
10. Glantz K, Durlach NI, Barnett RC, et al. Virtual reality (VR) for psychotherapy: from the physical to the social environment. Psychotherapy 1996; 33:464-73.
11. Rizzo A, Buckwalter JG. Special issue: virtual reality applications in neuropsychology: guest editor's introduction. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 2001; 10:iii-v.
12. Hoffman HG, Richards T, Coda B, et al.The illusion of presence in immersive virtual reality during an MRI brain scan. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2003; 6:127-31.
13. Krijn M, Emmelkamp PMG, Olafsson RP, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy of anxiety disorders: a review. Clinical Psychology Review 2004; 24:259-81.
14. Stevens B, Jerrams-Smith J. The sense of object-presence with projection-augmented models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2001; 2058:73-5.
15. Stevens B, Jerrams-Smith J, Heathcote D, et al. Putting the virtual into reality: assessing object presence with projection-augmented models. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 2002; 11:79-92.
16. Dillon C, Keogh E, Freeman J, et al. (2000) Aroused and immersed: the psychophysiology of presence. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Workshop on Presence. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
17. Wiederhold BK, Jang D, Kaneda M, et al. (2001) An investigation into physiological responses in virtual environments: an objective measurement of presence. In Riva G, Galimberti C, eds. Towards cyberpsychology: mind, cognition, and society in the Internet age. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 176-83.
18. Meehan M, Insko B, Whitton MC, et al. (2002) Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). San Antonio, Texas, pp. 645-52.
19. Slater M, Brogni A, Steed A. (2003) Physiological responses to breaks in presence: a pilot study. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Workshop on Presence. Aalborg, Denmark.
20. Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, et al. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2003; 29:1-15.
21. Tulving E, Schacter DL. Priming and human memory systems. Science 1990; 247:301-6.
22. Hauptmann B, Karni A. From primed to learn: the saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory. Cognitive Brain Research 2002; 13:313-22.
23. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002; 9:625-36.
24. Niedenthal PM. Embodying emotion. Science 2007; 316: 1002-5.
25. Slater M, Steed A, McCarthy J, et al. The influence of body movement on subjective presence in virtual environments. Human Factors 1998; 40:469-77.