Co-management in healthcare: Negotiating professional boundaries

Discourse & Communication

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 452-479

  Schryer, Catherine F ^a   Gladkova, Olga ^a   Spafford, Marlee M ^a   Lingard, Lorelei ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

discourse analysis; genre; healthcare communication; modality; ophthalmology; optometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 64549107955     PISSN: 17504813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1750481307082208     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adrian, J. (2006) ‘Multidisciplinary Team Working: Collaboration and Conflict’, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 15(1): 19—28.
2. American Academy of Ophthalmology (2002) ‘Academy and State Eye M.D.“Freezeout” O.D. Scope of Practice ’, 10 June,available online at:http://www.aao.org/aao/news/release/070502c.cfm],accessed 6 July 2004.
3. Apker, J., Propp, K.M., Zabava Ford, W.S. and Hofmeister, N. (2006) ‘Collaboration, Credibility, Compassion, and Coordination: ProfessionalNurse Communication Skill Sets in Healthcare Team Interactions’, Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the AmericanAssociation of Colleges of Nursing 22(3): 180—189.
4. Artemeva, N. (2004) ‘Key Concepts in Rhetorical Genre Studies: An Overview’, Technostyle 20(1): 3—38.
5. Artemeva, N. and Freedman, A. (eds) (2006) Rhetorical Genre Studies and Beyond. Winnipeg: Inkshed Publications.
6. Aston, J., Shi, E., Bullôt, H., Galway, R. and Crisp, J. (2005) ‘Qualitative Evaluation of Regular Morning Meetings Aimed at ImprovingInterdisciplinary Communication and Patient Outcomes’, International Journal of Nursing Practice 11(5): 206—213
7. Bado, W. and Williams, C.J. (1984) ‘Usefulness of Letters from Hospitals to General Practitioners’, British Medical Journal 288: 1813—1814.
8. Bakhtin, M. (1986) ‘The Problem of Speech Genres’, in SpeechGenres and Other Late Essays, trans. V.W. McGee, eds C. Emerson and M. Holquist, pp. 60—102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Bethke, W. (2002) ‘National Panel Report: Surgeons Weigh in on Comanagement’, Review of Ophthalmology June: 87—92.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, ed. and intro. J.B. Thompson, trans. G. Raymond and M. Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Butler, J. (2003) ‘A Minimalist Treatment of Modality’, Lingua 113: 967—996
13. Bybee, J. (1985) Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaningand Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. Canadian Association of Optometrists (2006 ) ‘The Optometrist and Healthcare Delivery in Canada:Role Document of the Canadian Association of Optometrists’, availableonline at:http://www.opto.ca/en/public/03_optometry/03_01_role.asp],accessed 2 July 2006.
15. Canadian Psychiatric Association (2006) 27 June, available online at:[http://www.cpaapc.org/Publications/Position_Papers/Shared.asp ].
16. Classé, J.G. (1989) Legal Aspects of Optometry. Boston, MA: Butterworths.
17. Clemence, M.L. and Seamark, D.A. (2002) ‘GP Referral for Physiotherapy to Musculoskeletal Conditions — AQualitative Study’, Family Practice 20(5): 578—582
18. Coe, R., Lingard, L. and Teslenko, T. (eds) (2002) The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre: Strategiesfor Stability and Change. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
19. Couper, I.D. and Henbest, R.J. (1996) ‘The Quality and Relationship of Referral and Reply Letters. The Effect ofIntroducing a Pro-forma Letter’, South African Medical Journal 86(12): 1540—1542.
20. Epstein, R.M. (1995) ‘Communication between Primary Care Physicians and Consultants’, Archives of Family Medicine 4(5): 403—409.
21. Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (eds) (1994) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
22. Gagliardi, A. (2002) ‘Use of Referral Reply Letters for Continuing Medical Education: A Review’, Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals 22(4): 222—229.
23. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
24. Hoye, L.F. (1997) Adverbs and Modality in English. Longman: London and New York.
25. Hoye, L.F. (2005) ‘ ‘You May Think That; I Couldn't Possibly Comment!” ModalityStudies: Contemporary Research and Future Directions. Part I’, Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1295—1321.
26. Huddleston, R. (2002) ‘The Verb’, in R. Huddleston and G.K. Pullum (eds) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, pp.71—212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004) ‘Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal’, Applied Linguistics: 25(2): 156—177
28. Iliffe, S., Wilcock, J. and Haworth, D. (2006) ‘Obstacles to Shared Care for Patients with Dementia: A Qualitative Study’, Family Practice 23(3): 353—362
29. Jacobs, L.G. and Pringle, M.A. (1990) ‘Referral Letters and Replies from Orthopaedic Departments: Opportunities Missed’, British Medical Journal 301: 470—473.
30. Jacobsson, B. (1994) ‘Recessive and Emergent Uses of Modal Auxiliaries in English’, English Studies 72(2): 166—182
31. James, F. (1986) Semantics of the English Subjunctive. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
32. Jones, A. (2006) ‘Multidisciplinary Team Working: Collaboration and Conflict’, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 15(1): 19—28.
33. Kalisch, B.J. and Begeny, S.M. (2005) ‘Improving Nursing Unit Teamwork’, The Journal of Nursing Administration 35(12): 550—556.
34. Klinge, A. (1995) ‘On the Linguistic Interpretation of Contractual Modalities’, Journal of Pragmatics 23: 649—675
35. Kratzer, A. (1977) ‘What “Must” and “Can” Must andCan Mean’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337—355
36. Leech, G.N. (1987) Meaning and the English Verb, 2nd edn. London: Longman, 1971.
37. Lemmon, E.J. (1977) An Introduction to Modal Logic, collab. D. Scott, ed. K. Segerberg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
38. Lingard, L. (1998) ‘The Rhetoric of Genre as Initiation: Socializing theNovice Physician’, unpublished dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
39. Lingard, L., Espin, S., Rubin, B., Whyte, S., Colmenares, M., Baker, G.R., Doran, D., Grober, E., Orser, B., Bohnen, J. and Reznick, R. (2005a) ‘Getting Teams to Talk: Development and Pilot Implementation of a Checklistto Promote Interprofessional Communication in the OR’, Quality and Safety in Healthcare 14(5): 340—346.
40. Lingard, L., Garwood, G., Schryer, C.F. and Spafford, M. (2003a) ‘A Certain Art of Uncertainty: Case Presentations and the Development ofProfessional Identity’, Social Science & Medicine 56: 603—616
41. Lingard, L., Hodges, B., MacRae, H. and Freeman, R. (2004) ‘Expert and Trainee Determinations of Rhetorical Relevance in Referral andConsultation Letters’, Medical Education 38: 168—176
42. Lingard, L., Regehr, G., Espin, S., Devito, I., Whyte, S., Buller, D., Sadovy, B., Rogers, D. and Reznick, R. (2005b) ‘Perceptions of Operating Room Tension across Professions: BuildingGeneralizable Evidence and Educational Resources’, Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 80(10 Suppl.): S75—9.
43. Lingard, L., Schryer, C.F., Spafford, M.M. and Garwood, K. (2003b) ‘Talking the Talk: School and Workplace Genre Tension in Clerkship Case Presentations’, Medical Education 37: 612—620
44. Lycan, W.G. (1994) Modality and Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
45. Lyons, J. (1995) Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Maryland Optometric Association (2002) ‘MOA Members Urged toFight “Goliath” ’, available online at:[http://www.marylandeyes.com/2002townhallmeeting.htm ], accessed 6 July 2004.
47. Michael, I. (1970) English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Mickan, S.M. (2005) ‘Evaluating the Effectiveness of Healthcare Teams’, Australian Health Review: A Publication of the AustralianHospital Association 29(2): 211—217
49. Miller, C.R. (1984) ‘Genre as Social Action’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151—167
50. Mitchell, P.B. et al. (2006) ‘The Management of Bipolar Disorder in General Practice’, The Medical Journal of Australia 184(11): 566—570
51. Newton, J., Eccles, M. and Hutchinson, A. (1992) ‘Communication between General Practitioners and Consultants: What ShouldTheir Letters Contain?’, British Medical Journal 304: 821—824.
52. Nicolson, S., Pirotta, M. and Chandros, P. (2005) ‘Shared Maternity Care: All Care — Not Enough Responsibility? AnAudit of Patient Care Communications Pre- and Post- a Multi-facetedIntervention’, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 45(6): 509—513
53. Nuyts, J. (2001) ‘Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions’,Journal of Pragmatics 33: 383—400.
54. Packer, S. and Lynch, J. (2002) ‘Ethics of Comanagement’, Archives of Ophthalmology 120(1): 71—76.
55. Palmer, F.R. (1986) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Palmer, F.R. (1990) Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.
57. Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (1999) ‘The Dynamics of Interactional and Institutional Orderin Work-related Settings’, in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical,Mediation and Management Settings,pp.1—57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
58. Schryer, C.F. (1993) ‘Records as Genre’, Written Communication 10(2): 200—234
59. Schryer, C.F. (2000) ‘Walking a Fine Line: Writing ‘Negative News’ Letters in an Insurance Company’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication 14(4): 445—497
60. Schryer, C.F., Campbell, S.L., Spafford, M.M. and Lingard, L. (2006) ‘You Are How You Cite: Citing Patient Information inHealthcare Settings’, in A. Freedman and N. Artemeva (eds) Rhetorical Genre Studies and Beyond, pp.143—187. Winnipeg: Inkshed Publications.
61. Schryer, C.F., Lingard, L. and Spafford, M. (2005) ‘Techne or Artful Science and the Genre of Case Presentations in Healthcare Settings’, Communication Monographs 72(2): 234—260
62. Schryer, C.F., Lingard, L., Spafford, M.M. and Garwood, K. (2003) ‘Structure and Agency in Medical CasePresentations ’, in C. Bazerman and D. Russell (eds) Writing Selves/ Writing Society, pp.62—96. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse andMind, Culture and Activity[ http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_society/].
63. Sebern, M.D. (2005) ‘Psychometric Evaluation of the Shared Care Instrument in a Sample of HomeHealthcare Family Dyads’, Journal of Nursing Measurement 13(3): 175—191
64. Sievers, B. and Wolf, S. (2006) ‘Achieving Clinical Nurse Specialist Competencies and Outcomes throughInterdisciplinary Education’, Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) 20(2): 75—80.
65. Spafford, M.M., Lingard, L., Schryer, C.F. and Hrynchak, P.K. (2004) ‘Tensions in the Field: Teaching Standards of Practice in Optometry Case Presentations’, Optometry & Vision Science 81: 800—806.
66. Spafford, M.M., Lingard, L., Schryer, C. and Hrynchak, P.K. (2005) ‘Teaching the Balance Act: Integrating Patient and Professional Agendas in Optometry’, Optometric Education 33(1): 21—27.
67. Spafford, M.M., Schryer, C.F., Mian, M. and Lingard, L. (2006a) ‘Look Who's Talking: Activity Mapping in Paediatric Clerkship Case Presentations’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication 20(2): 121—158
68. Spafford, M.M., Schryer, C.F., Lingard, L. and Hrynchak, P.K. (2006b) ‘What Healthcare Students Do with What They Don't Know. The SocializingPower of ‘Uncertainty ’ in the Case Presentation’, Communication & Medicine 3(1): 81—92.
69. Spafford, M.M., Schryer, C.F., Campbell, S. and Lingard, L. (forthcoming) ‘Towards Embracing Clinical Uncertainty: Lessons from Three Healthcare Fields’, Journal of Social Work.
70. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques andProcedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Sullivan, M.P. et al. (2004) ‘Defining Best Practices for Specialty Geriatric Mental Health OutreachServices: Lessons for Implementing Mental Health Reform’, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 49(7): 458—466
72. Tattersall, M.H.N., Buttow, P.N., Brown, J.E. and Thompson, J.F. (2002) ‘Improving Doctor's Letters’, MJA 177: 516—520
73. Thwaites, J.H. (2005) ‘Shared Care between Geriatricians and Orthopaedic Surgeons as a Model ofCare for Older Patients with Hip Fractures’, The NeW Zealand Medical Journal 118(1214): U1438.
74. Tuck, M.W. and Crick, R.P. (1991) ‘Efficiency of Referral for Suspected Glaucoma’, British Medical Journal 302: 998—1000.
75. Varpio, L., Spafford, M.M., Schryer, C. and Lingard, L. (forthcoming) ‘Seeing and Listening: A Visual and Social Analysis of Optometric RecordKeeping Practices’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21(4).
76. Verhoef, J., Toussaint, P.J., Putter, H., Zwetsloot-Schonk, J.H.M. and VlietVlieland, T.P.M. (2005) ‘Pilot Study of the Development of a Theory-based Instrument to Evaluate theCommunication Process during Multidisciplinary Team Conferences in Rheumatology’, International Journal of Medical Informatics 74(10): 783—790
77. Westerman, R.F., Hull, F.M., Bezerman, P.D. and Gort, G. (1990) ‘A Study of Communication between General Practitioners and Specialists’, British Journal of General Practice 40(340): 445—449.
78. Willis, C.E. (2000) ‘Glaucoma in Optometric Practice: A Survey of Optometrists’, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics: The Journal of the BritishCollege of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) 20(1): 70—75.
79. Wolf, R. (1997) ‘Shared Care Recording in Community Care’, Nursing Times 93(28): 52—53.
80. Wordsmith (2005) Version 4.0 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Wright, H.G., (1951) An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.