Improving doctors' letters

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 177, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 516-520

  Tattersall, Martin H N ^a   Butow, Phyllis N ^a   Brown, Judith E ^a   Thompson, John F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; CONSULTATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; WRITING;

EID: 0037020967     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04926.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Pringle M. Referral letters - ensuring quality. Practitioner 1991; 235: 507-510.
2. Penney TM. Delayed communication between hospitals and general practitioners. BMJ 1988; 297: 28-29.
3. Solomon JK, Maxwell TBH, Hopkins AP. Content of a discharge summary from a medical ward: views of general practitioners and hospital doctors. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1995; 29: 307-310.
4. Long A, Atkins JB. Communications between general practitioners and consultants. BMJ 1974; 4: 456-459.
5. Bado W, Williams CJ. Usefulness of letters from hospitals to general practitioners. BMJ 1984; 288: 1813-1814.
6. Kamien M. Writing to referring doctors. Aust N Z J Med 1995; 25: 463-464.
7. Hansen JP, Brown SE, Sullivan RJ, Muhlbaier LH. Factors related to an effective referral and consultation process. J Fam Pract 1982; 15: 651-656.
8. Newton J, Hutchinson A, Hayes V, et al. Do clinicians tell each other enough? An analysis of referral communication in two specialties. Fam Pract 1994; 11: 15-20.
9. Graham PH. Improving communication with specialists. The case of an oncology clinic. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 625-627.
10. Newton J, Eccles M, Hutchinson A. Communication between general practitioners and consultants. What should their letters contain? BMJ 1992; 304: 821-824.
11. Lloyd BW, Barnett P. Use of problem lists in letters between hospital doctors and general practitioners. BMJ 1993; 306: 247.
12. Rawal J, Barnett P, Lloyd BW. Use of structured letters to improve communications between hospital doctors and general practitioners. BMJ 1993; 307: 1044.
13. Jenkins S, Arroll B, Hawken S, Nicholson R. Referral letters: Are form letters better? Br J Gen Pract 1997; 47: 107-108.
14. Couper ID, Henbest RJ. The quality and relationship of referral and reply letters: the effect of introducing a pro-forma letter. S Afr Med J 1996; 86: 1540-1542.
15. Dupont C. Quality of referral letters. Lancet 2002; 359: 1701.
16. Tattersall MHN, Griffin A-M, Dunn SM, et al. Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultation. What is wanted and what was contained in letters from one medical oncologist. Aust N Z J Med 1995; 25: 479-482.
17. Ray S, Archbold RA, Preston S, et al. Computer-generated correspondence for patients attending an open-access chest pain clinic. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1998; 32: 420-421.
18. Dunn DC, Dale RF. Combined computer generated discharge documents and surgical audit. BMJ 1986; 292: 816-818.
19. McConnell D, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care. Br J Cancer 1999; 80: 427-437.
20. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 2nd ed. New York: Halsted Press, 1995.
21. Prasher VP. Problem lists in letters. BMJ 1993; 306; 579.
22. Getting it write. Getting it write. Fellowship Affairs: Journal of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians February 1999.