Post-normal science and the rhetoric of inquiry: Deconstructing normal science?

Futures

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 705-719

  Luks, Fred ^a  

^a NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0033198711     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00028-2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. McCloskey D.N. Responses to my critics. Eastern Economic Journal. 13:1987;308-311.
2. Majone, quoted in Fischer F, Forrester J. Editor's introduction. In: Fischer F, Forrester J, editors. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 1993:1-17.
3. O'Connor M, Faucheux S, Froger G, Funtowicz S, Munda G. Emergent complexity and procedural rationality: post-normal science for sustainability. In: Costanza R, Segura O, Martinez-Alier J, editors. Getting down to earth: practical applications of ecological economics. Washington (D.C.): Island Press, 1996:223-48.
4. Funtowicz S, O'Connor M, Ravetz J. Emergent complexity and ecological economics. In: van den Berg JCJM, van der Straaten J, editors. Economy and ecosystems in change. Analytical and historical approaches. Cheltenham/Lyme: Edward Elgar, 1997:75-95.
5. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. The poetry of thermodynamics. Futures. 29(9):1997;791-810.
6. Nordhaus W.D. The economics of the greenhouse effect. Economic Journal. 101:1991;920-937.
7. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics. 10(3):1994;197-207.
8. Ravetz J. Economics as an elite folk science: the suppression of uncertainty. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 17(2):1994;165-184.
9. Lash S, Urry J. Economies of signs and space. London: Sage, 1994.
10. Beck U. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986.
11. Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 1990.
12. Giddens A. The third way. The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
13. Luks F. What's so bad about being 'postmodern'? In preparation.
14. Healy S.A. Changing science and ensuring our future. Futures. 29(6):1997;505-517.
15. Jokinen P., Malaska P., Kaivo-oja J. The environment in an "information society". a transition stage towards more sustainable development? Futures. 30(6):1998;485-498.
16. Redclift M, Woodgate G. Sociology and the environment. Discordant discourse? In: Redclift M, Benton T, editors. Social theory and the global environment. London/New York: Routledge, 1994:51-66.
17. Luks F. The rhetorics of ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 26:1998;139-149.
18. Sachs W. Zählen oder erzählen. Wechselwirkung. December:1995;20-25.
19. McCloskey D.N. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature. XXI:1983;481-517.
20. Mäki U. Diagnosing McCloskey. Journal of Economic Literature. XXXIII:1995;1300-1318.
21. Nelson JS, Megill A, McCloskey DN. Rhetoric of inquiry. In: Nelson JS, Megill A, McCloskey DN, editors. The rhetoric of the human sciences. Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987:3-18.
22. McCloskey DN. Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
23. McCloskey DN. The consequences of rhetoric. In: Klamer A, McCloskey DN, Solow RM, editors. The consequences of economic rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988:280-93.
24. Klamer A. Conversations with economists. New classical economics and opponents speak out on the current controversy in macroeconomics. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984.
25. McCloskey D.N. Some news that at least will not bore you. Eastern Economic Journal. 21(4):1995;551-553.
26. McCloskey DN. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.
27. Solow RM. Comments from inside economics. In: Klamer A, McCloskey DN, Solow RM, editors. The consequences of economic rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988:31-7.
28. Wisman JD. The scope and goals of economic science. A Habermasian perspective. In: Lavoie D, editor. Economics and hermeneutics. London/New York: Routledge, 1990:113-33.
29. Tribe K. Governing economy. The reformation of German economic discourse 1750-1840. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
30. O'Hara S.U. Discursive ethics in environmental valuation and environmental policy. Ecological Economics. 16:1996;95-107.
31. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R, editor. Ecological economics. The science and management of sustainability. New York/Oxford: Columbia University Press, 1991:137-52.
32. Bellofiore R, Silva F. Introduction. In: Marzola A, Silva F, editors. John Maynard Keynes: language and method. Aldershot/Vermont: Edward Elgar, 1994:1-12.
33. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
34. Klamer A, Leonard TC. So what's an economic metaphor? In: Mirowski P, editor. Natural images in economic thought: "markets read tooth and claw". Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994:20-51.
35. McCloskey D.N. Metaphors economists live by. Social Research. 62(2):1995;215-237.
36. Throgmorton JA. Survey research as rhetorical trope: electric power planning arguments in Chicago. In: Fischer F, Forrester J, editors. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham/London, Duke University Press, 1993:117-44.
37. Bruner M., Oelschlaeger M. Rhetoric, environmentalism, and environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics. 16:1994;376-396.
38. Snow CP. The two cultures. (With introduction by Stefan Collini.) Cambridge University Press, 1993 [1959].
39. Duchin F. Ecological economics: the second stage. In: Costanza R, Segura O, Martinez-Alier J, editors. Getting down to earth: practical applications of ecological economics. Washington (DC): Island Press, 1996:285-99.
40. Norgaard R.B. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics. 1:1989;37-57.
41. Lewis M., Sebberson D. The rhetoricality of economic theory: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Thorstein Veblen. Journal of Economic Issues. XXXI(2):1997;417-424.
42. Heilbroner R. Economics as ideology. In: Samuels WJ, editor. Economics as discourse. An analysis of the language of economics. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990:101-16.
43. Ferber MA, Nelson JA. Introduction: the social construction of economics and the social construction of gender. In: Ferber MA, Nelson JA, editors. Beyond economic man. Feminist theory and economics. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press, 1993:1-22.
44. McCloskey DN. If you're so smart. The narrative of economic expertise. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
45. Norgaard R.B. Metaphors we might survive by. Ecological Economics. 15:1995;129-131.
46. Luks F. Der steady-state als Grundlage eines sustainable development. Doctoral thesis, Hamburg School of Economics and Politics, 1998.
47. Wynne B. Scientific knowledge and the global environment. In: Redclift M, Benton T, editors. Social theory and the global environment. London/New York: Routledge, 1994:169-89.
48. Luks F. Post-normal science, Dematerialisierung und die Ökonomie - Über den (wirtschafts)wissenschaftlichen Umgang mit Umweltproblemen. In: Köhn J, Welfens M.J, editors. Neue Ansätze in der Umweltökonomie. Marburg: Metropolis, 1996:89-108.
49. Luks F. Throughput, scale, material input. In: Köhn J, Gowdy J, Hinterberger F, van der Straaten J, editors. Sustainability in question: the search for a conceptual framework. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999:119-34.
50. O'Connor M. Complexity and evolution. Methodology for a positive treatment of indeterminacy. Futures. 26(6):1994;610-615.
51. Hennicke P., Becker R. Ist Anpassen billiger als vermeiden? Anmerkungen zur Aussagefähigkeit globaler Kosten/Nutzen-Analysen von Klimaänderungen. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft. 2:1995;143-155.
52. Schmidt-Bleek F. Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS - das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften. Berlin: Birkhäuser, 1994.
53. Viederman S. Public policy: challenge to ecological economics. In: Jansson AM, Hammer M, Folke C, Costanza R, editors. Investing in natural capital. The ecological economics approach to sustainability. Washington (DC)/Covelo: Island Press, 1994:467-78.
54. Walther H. Ökonomische Doktrinen als Werkzeug politischer Legitimation: Das Beispiel des Keynesianismus. In: Eicker-Wolf K, Käpernick R, Niechoj T, Reiner S, Weiß J, editors. Wirtschaftspolitik im theoretischen Vakuum. Marburg, Metropolis: 1996:19-41.
55. Walther H. Ökonomische Doktrinen als Werkzeug politischer Legitimation. Das Beispiel Monetarismus. In: Matzner E, Nowotny E, editors. Was ist relevante Ökonomie heute? Festschrift für Kurt W. Rothschild. Marburg: Metropolis, 1994:73-96.
56. Duchin F. Ecological economics: the research challenge. Ecological Economics Bulletin. 1(1):1996;8.
57. Maxwell J.A., Randall A. Ecological economic modelling in a pluralistic, participatory society. Ecological Economics. 1:1989;233-249.
58. Rothschild K.W. Sprüchliches und Widersprüchliches. Anmerkungen zur kognitiven Dissonanz in der Ökonomie. Konjunkturpolitik. 44(2):1998;101-113.