Effect of a direct-fed microbial (Primalac) on structure and ultrastructure of small intestine in turkey poults

Poultry Science

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 491-503

  Rahimi, S ^a   Grimes, J L ^b   Fletcher, O ^b   Oviedo, E ^b   Sheldon, B W ^b  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intestine; Morphology; Probiotic; Salmonella; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AVES; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CANDIDATUS ARTHROMITUS SP. SFB-MOUSE; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; PIERIS BRASSICAE; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR HEIDELBERG; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR KENTUCKY; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM;

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; ARTICLE; BIRD DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMALL INTESTINE; TURKEY (BIRD); ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; DIET; FEMALE; INTESTINE, SMALL; POULTRY DISEASES; PROBIOTICS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; TURKEYS;

EID: 63849316587     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00272     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alvarez, M. T., N. Ledesma, G. Tellez, J. L. Molinari, and P. Tato. 2003. Comparison the immune responses against Salmonella enterica serovar gallinarum infection between necked neck chickens and a commercial chicken line. Avian Pathol. 32:193-203.
2. Angel, R., R. A. Dalloul, and J. Doerr. 2005. Performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with a direct-fed microbial. Poult. Sci. 84:1222-1231.
3. Awad, W. A., J. Bohm, E. Razzazi-Fazeli, K. Ghareeb, and J. Zentek. 2006. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 85:974-979.
4. Budino, F. E. L., M. C. Thomaz, R. N. Kronka, L. S. O. Nakaghi, F. M. Tucci, A. L. Fraga, A. J. Scandolera, and R. A. R. Huaynate. 2005. Effect of probiotic and prebiotic inclusion in weaned piglet diets on structure and ultra-structure of small intestine. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 48:921-929.
5. Caballero-Franco, C., K. Keller, C. De Simone, and K. Chadee. 2007. The VSL#3 probiotic formula induces mucin gene expression and secretion in colonic epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 292:G315-G322.
6. Cera, K. R., D. C. Mahan, R. F. Cross, G. A. Reinhart, and R. E. Whitmoyer. 1988. Effect of age, weaning and postweaning diet on small intestinal growth and jejunal morphology in young swine. J. Anim. Sci. 66:574-584.
7. Chichlowski, M., W. J. Croom, F. W. Edens, B. W. McBride, R. Qiu, C. C. Chiang, L. R. Daniel, G. B. Havenstein, and M. D. Koci. 2007. Microarchitecture and spatial relationship between bacteria and ileal, cecal, and colonic epithelium in chicks fed a direct-fed microbial, Primalac, and Salinomycin. Poult. Sci. 86:1121-1132.
8. Corrier, D. E., A. Hinton Jr., L. F. Kubena, R. L. Ziprin, and J. R. Deloach. 1991. Decreased Salmonella colonization in turkey poults inoculated with anaerobic cecal microflora and provided dietary lactose. Poult. Sci. 70:1345-1350.
9. Deplancke, B., and H. R. Gaskins. 2001. Microbial modulation of innate defence: goblet and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72(Suppl.):11315-11415.
10. Fan, Y., J. Croom, V. Christensen, B. Black, A. Bird, L. Daniel, B. McBride, and E. Eisen. 1997. Jejunal glucose uptake and oxygen consumption in turkey poults selected for rapid growth. Poult. Sci. 76:1738-1745.
11. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378.
12. Ghabdan, G. 1998. Investigation on the efficacy of early probiotic treatment on the performance of broiler chicks. Vol. II. Pages 305-310 in Proc. 10th Eur. Poult. Conf., Jerusalem, Israel.World's Poult. Sci. Assoc., Israeli Branch, Jerusalem, Israel.
13. Gotteland, M., S. Cruchet, and S. Verbeke. 2001. Effect of lactobacillus ingestion on the gasterointestinal mucosal barrier alterations induced by indometacin in humans. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 15:11-17.
14. Grimes, J. L., S. Rahimi, E. Oviedo, B. W. Sheldon, and F. B. O. Santos. 2008. Effects of a direct-fed microbial (Primalac) on turkey poult performance and susceptibility to oral Salmonella challenge. Poult. Sci. 87:1464-1470.
15. Gunal, M., G. Yayli, O. Kaye, N. Karahan, and O. Sulak. 2006. The effect of antibiotic growth promoter, probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance, intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5:149-155.
16. Hamman, L., V. El-Samalouti, A. J. Turner, H. D. Flad, and E. Th. Rietschel. 1998. Components of gut bacteria as immunomodulators. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41:141-154.
17. Heczko, U., A. Abe, and B. B. Finlay. 2000. Segmented filamentous bacteria prevent colonization of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli 0103 in rabbits. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1027-1033.
18. Iji, P. A., A. Saki, and D. R. Tivey. 2001. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diet supplemented with a mannan oligosaccharide. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81:1186-1192.
19. Ikeda, H., C. L. Yang, J. Tong, H. Nishimaki, K. Masuda, T. Takeo, K. Kasai, and G. Itoh. 2002. Rat small intestinal goblet cell kinetics in the process of restitution of surface epithelium subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Dig. Dis. Sci. 47:590-600.
20. 2 inhibits indomethacin induced small intestinal lesions through EP3 and EP4 receptors. Dig. Dis. Sci. 47:894-904.
21. Meyerholz, D. K., T. J. Stable, and N. F. Cheille. 2002. Segmented filamentous bacteria interact with intraepithelial mononuclear cells. Infect. Immun. 70:3277-3280.
22. Miles, R. D., and S. M. Bootwalla. 1991. Direct-fed microbial animal production. Pages 117-132 in Avian. A review of literature. National Feed Ingredient Association, West Des Moines, IA.
23. Mohan, B., R. Kadrivel, A. Natarajan, and M. Bhaskaran. 1996. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth, nitrogen utilization, and serum cholesterol in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:395-401.
24. Montalto, M., N. Maggiano, R. Ricci, A. Gasbarrini, and G. Gasbarrini. 2004. Lactobacillus acidophilus protects tight junctions from aspirin damage in HT-29 cells. Digestion 69:225-228.
25. Nava, G. M., L. R. Bielke, T. R. Callaway, and M. P. Castaneda. 2005. Probiotic alternatives to reduce gastrointestinal Infections: the poultry experience. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 6:105-118.
26. Ozurk, E. and A. Yildrim. 2004. Probiotiklerin etlik piliclerin performansy ve bagirsak mikrobiyolojik ozelliklerine etkileri. 4. Ulusal zootekni Bilim kongresi. Cilt 2. poster Bildiriler, 5:297-303.
27. Pelicano, E. R. L., P. A. Souza, H. B. A. Souza, D. F. Figueiredo, M. M. Biago, S. R. Carvalho, and V. F. Bordon. 2005. Intestinal mucosa development in broiler chickens fed natural growth promoters. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 7:221-229.
28. Pluske, J. R., D. J. Hampson, and I. H. Williams. 1997. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 51:215-236.
29. Rahimi, S., and K. Karimi. 2005. Effect of various levels of probiotic on morphology of small intestinal mucosa in broiler chicks. 14th World Vet. Poult. Congr., Istanbul, Turkey. World's Poult. Sci. Assoc., Turkish Branch, Ankara, Turkey.
30. Rahimi, S., Z. Moghadam Shiraz, T. Zahraei Salehi, M. A. Karimi Torshizi, and J. L. Grimes. 2007. Prevention of Salmonella infection in poultry by specific egg-derived antibody. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 6:230-236.
31. Robertson, A. M., and D. P. Wright. 1997. Bacterial glycosulphatases and sulphamucin degradation. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 11:361-366.
32. Santos, W. G., E. P. Filgueiras, and O. H. Silva. 2002. Efeito da manose como prebiotico sobre a morfologia intestinal de leitoes na fase de crèche. In: Reuniao Annual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39, Recife. Anais. Recife, Brazil.
33. SAS Institute. 1998. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. 8th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
34. Shen, T. Y., H. L. Qin, Z. G. Gao, X. B. Fan, X. M. Hang, and Y. Q. Jiang. 2006. Influences of enteral nutrition combined with probiotics on gut microflora and barrier function of rats with abdominal infection. World J. Gastroenterol. 12:4352-4358.
35. Sklan, D. 2004. Early gut development: The interaction between feed, gut health and immunity. Pages 9-32 in Interfacing Immunity, Gut Health and Performance. L. A. Tucker and J. A. Taylor-Pickard, ed. Nottingham Univ. Press, Nottingham, UK.
36. Smirov, A., R. Perez, E. Amit-Romach, D. Sklan, and Z. Uni. 2005. Mucin dynamics and microbial populations in chicken small intestine are changed by dietary probiotic growth promoter supplementation. J. Nutr. 135:187-192.
37. Snoeyenbos, G. H., O. M. Weinack, and C. G. Smayser. 1979. Further studies on competitive exclusion for controlling Salmonella in chickens. Avian Dis. 24:904-914.
38. Tellez, G., V. M. Petrone, M. Escorcia, T. Y. Morishita, C. W. Cobb, and L. Villasenor. 2001. Evaluation of avian specific probiotic and Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Heidelberg-specific antibodies on cecal colonization and organ invasion of Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler. J. Food Prot. 64:287-291.
39. Yagi, T., Y. Miyawaki, A. Nishikawa, S. Horiyama, K. Yamauchi, and S. Kuwano. 1990. Prostaglandin E2-mediated stimulation of mucus synthesis and secretion by rhein anthrone, the active metabolic of sennosides A and B in the mouse colon. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 42:542-545.