Effects of a direct-fed microbial (primalac) on Turkey poult performance and susceptibility to oral Salmonella challenge

Poultry Science

Volumn 87, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1464-1470

  Grimes, J L ^a   Rahimi, S ^b   Oviedo, E ^a   Sheldon, B W ^a   Santos, F B O ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Direct fed microbial; Feed pelleting; Probiotic; Salmonella; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AVES; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; PIERIS BRASSICAE; SALMONELLA;

EID: 46249125931     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00498     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. AAFCO. 1999. Official publication: Association of American Feed Control Officials, Inc. C.P. Frank, Georgia Department of Agriculture, Plant Food, Feed and Grain Division, Capitol Square, Atlanta, GA.
2. Angel, R., R. A. Dalloul, and J. Doerr. 2005. Performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with a direct-fed microbial. Poult. Sci. 84:1222-1231.
3. Araba, M., and N. M. Dale. 1990. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of over processing soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 69:1749-1752.
4. Arscott, G. H., V. L. Hulit, and R. K. Poutz. 1957. The use of barley in high-efficiency broiler rations. 3. Effect of pellets and reground pellets on growth and efficiency of feed utilization. Poult. Sci. 36:1388-1389.
5. Blodgett, R. 2001. Most probable number from serial dilutions. Appendix 2. Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam- a2.html. Accessed Sept. 2007.
6. Calet, C. 1965. The relative value of pellets versus mash and grain in poultry nutrition. World's Poult. Sci. J. 21:23-52.
7. Casas, I., F. W. Edens, and W. J. Dobrogosz. 1998. Lactobacillus reuteri: An effective probiotic for poultry and other animals. Pages 475-518 in Lactic Acid Bacteria, Microbiology and Functional Aspects. 2nd ed. S. Salminen and A. von Wright, ed. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY.
8. Dale, N. 1992. Pelleting effects on lysine bioavailability in diets containing bakery products. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1:84-87.
9. Damron, B. L., H. R. Wilson, R. A. Voitle, and R. H. Harms. 1981. A mixed Lactobacillus culture in the diet of Broad Breasted Large White turkey hens. Poult. Sci. 60:1350-1351.
10. Davison, S., C. E. Benson, and R. J. Eckroade. 1995. Comparison of environmental monitoring protocols for the detection of Salmonella in poultry houses. Avian Dis. 39:475-479.
11. Dibner, J. J., and J. D. Richards. 2005. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poult. Sci. 84:634-643.
12. Dozier, W. A., III. 2001. Cost-effective pellet quality for meat birds. Feed Manage. 52:21-24.
13. Dufrenne, J., W. Ritmeester, E. D. Asch, F. Leusden, and R. Jonge. 2001. Quantification of the contamination of chicken and chicken products in the Netherlands with Salmonella and Campylobacter. J. Food Prot. 64:538-541.
14. Edens, F. W., C. R. Parkhurst, I. A. Casas, and W. J. Dobrogosz. 1997. Principles of ex ovo competitive exclusion and in ovo administration of Lactobacillus reuteri. Poult. Sci. 76:179-196.
15. Elam, N. A., J. F. Gleghorn, J. D. Rivera, M. L. Galyean, P. J. Defoor, M. M. Brashears, and S. M. Younts-Dahl. 2003. Effects of live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (strains NP45 and NP51) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii on performance, carcass, and intestinal characteristics, and Escherichia coli strain O157 shedding of finishing beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2686-2698.
16. England, J.A., S. E. Watkins, E. Saleh, P. W. Waldroup, I. Casa, and D. Burnham. 1996. Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri on live performance and intestinal development of male turkeys. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 5:311-324.
17. Evangelisti, D. G., A. R. English, A. E. Girard, J. E. Lynch, and I. A. Solomons. 1975. Influence of subtherapeutic levels of oxytetracycline on Salmonella Typhimurium in swine, calves, and chickens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 8:664-672.
18. FDA. 2003. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Regulatory Affairs: Compliance Policy Guides. Section 689.100 Direct-Fed Microbial Products (CPG 7126.41).
19. FoodNet. 2005. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food - 10 sites, United States, 2004. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 54:352-356.
20. Francis, C., D. M. Janky, A. S. Arafa, and R. H. Harms. 1978. Interrelationship of lactobacillus and zinc bacitracin in the diets of turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 57:1687-1689.
21. Fuller, R. 1989. A review: Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378.
22. Gustafson, R. H., and R. E. Bowen. 1997. A Review: Antibiotic use in animal agriculture. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 83:531-541.
23. Hargis, B. M., D. J. Caldwell, and J. A. Byrd. 2001. Microbial pathogens of poultry: Live bird considerations. In Poultry Meat Processing. A. R. Sams, ed. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.
24. Higgins, J. P., S. E. Higgins, J. L. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez, and B. M. Hargis. 2007. Temporal effects of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture on Salmonella in neonatal broilers. Poult. Sci. 86:1662-1666.
25. Hussar, N., and A. R. Robblee. 1962. Effects of pelleting on the utilization of feed by the growing chicken. Poult. Sci. 41:1489-1493.
26. Leeson, S., and J. D. Summers. 2001. Scott's Nutrition of the Chicken. 4th ed. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
27. Maiolino, R., A. Fioretti, L. F. Menna, and C. Meo. 1992. Research on the efficiency of probiotics in diets for broiler chickens. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. B62:482-486.
28. Mead, G. C. 2000. Prospects for competitive exclusion treatment to control Salmonellas and other foodborne pathogens in poultry. Vet. J. 159:111-123.
29. Miles, R. D., and S. M. Bootwalla. 1991. Direct fed microbials in animal production. Pages 117-132 in Direct-Fed Microbials in Animal Production. A Review. National Feed Ingredient Association, West Des Moines, IA.
30. Moore, P. R., A. Evenson, T. D. Luckey, E. McCoy, E. A. Elvehjen, and E. B. Hart. 1946. Use of sulphasuccidine, streptothricin, and streptomycin in nutritional studies with the chick. J. Biol. Chem. 165:437-441.
31. Moriñigo, M. A., J. J. Borrego, and P. Romero. 1986. Comparative study of different methods for detection and enumeration of Salmonella spp. in natural waters. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61:169-176.
32. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
33. Nayak, R., and P. B. Kenney. 2002. Screening of Salmonella isolates from a turkey production facility for antibiotic resistance. Poult. Sci. 81:1496-1500.
34. Nurmi, E., and M. Rantala. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241:210-211.
35. Owings, W. J. 1992. Nutritive effects of a direct-fed microbial preparation on growing turkey toms. Poult. Sci. 71:932-935.
36. Patterson, J. A., and K. M. Burkholder. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci. 82:627-631.
37. Persson, U., and S. I. Jendteg. 1992. The economic impact of poultry-borne salmonellosis: How much should be spent on prophylaxis? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 15:207-213.
38. Plavnik, I., E. Wax, D. Sklan, and S. Hurwitz. 1997. The response of broiler chickens and turkey poults to steam-pelleted diets supplemented with fat and carbohydrates. Poult. Sci. 76:1006-1013.
39. Robberson, K. D. 2003. Effect of feed texture on growth performance and litter moisture when fed to growing-finishing commercial turkeys. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2:183-187.
40. Santos, F. B. O., X. Li, J. B. Payne, and B. W. Sheldon. 2005. Estimation of most probable number Salmonella populations on commercial North Carolina turkey farms. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 14:700-708.
41. SAS Institute. 1998. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. 8th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
42. Scioli, C., S. Esposito, G. Anzilotti, A. Pavone, and C. Pennucci. 1983. Transferable drug resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from antibiotic-fed chickens. Poult. Sci. 62:382-384.
43. Sinell, H. J., O. Pietzsch, H. Klingbeil, and M. Benner. 1990. Estimation of most probable number of Salmonella in retail samples of minced pork. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 11:135-142.
44. Swanson, K. M. J., R. L. Petran, and J. H. Hanlin. 2001. Culture methods for enumeration of microorganisms. Pages 53-62 in Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th ed. F. P. Downes, and K. Ito, ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
45. Tate, C. R., and G. Miller. 1990. The isolation of salmonellae from poultry environmental samples by several enrichment procedures using plating media with and without novobiocin. Poult. Sci. 69:721-726.
46. Tellez, G., S. E. Higgins, A. M. Donoghue, and B. M. Hargis. 2006. Digestive physiology and the role of microorganisms. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:136-144.
47. Thomas, H. A. 1942. Bacterial densities from fermentation tube test. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 34:572-576.
48. Voogt, N., M. Raes, W. J. B. Wannet, A. M. Henken, and A. W. van de Giessen. 2001. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 32:89-92.
49. WHO. 2006. Subject: Drug-resistant Salmonella. http//www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs139/en/ Accessed September 2007.
50. Wiberg, C., and P. Norberg. 1996. Comparison between a cultural procedure using Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and motility enrichments on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for Salmonella detection from food and feed. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 29:353-360.
51. Zulkifli, I., N. Abdullah, N. Mohad Azrin, and Y. W. Ho. 2000. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracyclin under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:593-597.