Comparison of MEG and EEG on the basis of somatic evoked responses elicited by stimulation of the snout in the juvenile swine

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 214-229

  Okada, Yoshio ^a   Lähteenmäki, Airi ^b   Xu, Chibing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomagnetism; Magnetoencephalography; Pig; Somatic evoked magnetic field; Somatic evoked potential; Somatosensory cortex; Swine

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FACE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE PROJECTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SWINE;

EID: 0345299170     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00111-4     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adrian E.D. Afferent areas in the brain of the ungulates. Brain. 66:1943;89-103.
2. Allison, T., Goff, W.R., Williamson, P.D. and Van Gilder, J.C. On the neural origin of early components of the human somatosensory evoked potential. In: J.E. Desmedt (Ed.), Clinical Uses of Cerebral, Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Prog. Clin. Neurophysiol. vol. 7. Basel, Karger, 1980, pp. 51-68.
3. Allison T., Hume A.L. A comparative analysis of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat and rat. Exp. Neurol. 72:1981;592-611.
4. Allison T., McCarthy G., Wood C.C., Jones S.J. Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. Brain. 114:1991;2465-2503.
5. Andrews R.J., Knight R.T., Kirby R.P. Evoked potential mapping of auditory and somatosensory cortices in the miniature swine. Neurosci. Lett. 114:1990;27-31.
6. Arezzo J., Legatt A.D., Vaughan H.G. Jr. Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory evoked potentials in the monkey. I. Early components Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 46:1979;155-172.
7. Arezzo J., Vaughan H.G. Jr., Legatt A.D. Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory evoked potentials in the monkey. II. Cortical components Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 51:1981;1-18.
8. Babiloni F., Babiloni C., Carducci F., Fattorini L., Onorati P., Urbano A. Spline Laplacian estimate of EEG potentials over a realistic magnetic resonance-constructed scalp surface model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 98:1996;363-373.
9. Babiloni F., Babiloni C., Carducci F., Fattorini L., Anello C., Onorati P., Urbano A. High resolution EEG: a new model-dependent spatial deblurring method using a realistically-shaped MR-constructed subject's head model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 102:1997;69-80.
10. Bagley, C. Jr., Cortical motor mechanism of the sheep brain. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1922, 7: 417-453.
11. Barth D.S., Di S. The electrophysiological basis of epileptiform magnetic fields in neocortex. Brain Res. 530:1990;35-39.
12. Barth D.S., Sutherling W. Current source-density and neuromagnetic analysis of the direct cortical response in rat cortex. Brain Res. 450:1988;280-294.
13. Barth D.S., Sutherling W., Broffman J., Beatty J. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 63:1986;260-273.
14. Breazile J.E. The cytoarchitecture of the brain stem of the domestic pig. J. Comp. Neurol. 129:1967;169-188.
15. Breazile J.E., Swafford B.C., Thompson W.D. Study of the motor cortex of the domestic pig. Am. J. Vet. Res. 27:1966;1369-1373.
16. Buchanan, D.S., Crum, D.B., Cox, D. and Wikswo, J.P. Jr. MicroSQUID: A close-spaced four channel magnetometer. In: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink and M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism. Plenum, New York, 1989, pp. 677-679.
17. Campbell, A.W. Histological Studies on the Localization of Cerebral Function. University Press, Cambridge, 1905.
18. Cohen D. Magnetoencephalography: Evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha-rhythm currents. Science. 161:1968;784-786.
19. Cohen D. Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconductivity magnetometer. Science. 175:1972;664-666.
20. Cohen D., Cuffin B.N. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 56:1983;38-51.
21. Cohen D., Hosaka H. Magnetic field produced by a current dipole. J. Electrocardiol. 9:1976;409-417.
22. Craner, S.L. and Ray, R.H. Somatosensory cortex of the neonatal pig: I. Topographical organization of primary somatosensory cortex (SI). J. Comp. Neurol., 1991a, 306: 24-38.
23. Craner, S.L. and Ray, R.H. Somatosensory cortex of the neonatal pig: II. Topographical organization of secondary somatosensory cortex (SII). J. Comp. Neurol., 1991b, 306: 39-48.
24. Cuffin B.N., Cohen D. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 47:1979;131-146.
25. Geselowitz D.B. On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources. IEEE Trans. Mag. 6:1970;346-347.
26. Gevins A., Le J., Martin N.K., Brickett P. nd, Desmond J., Reutter B. High resolution EEG: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and MRI integration methods. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 90:1994;337-358.
27. Gevins A., Leong H., Smith M., Le J., Du R. Mapping cognitive brain function with modern high-resolution electroencephalography. Trends Neurosci. 18:1995;429-436.
28. Grynszpan F., Geselowitz D.B. Model studies for the magnetocardiogram. Biophys. J. 13:1973;911-925.
29. Hämäläinen M., Sarvas J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:1989;165-171.
30. Kaufman L., Okada Y.C., Brenner D., Williamson S.J. On the relationship between somatic evoked fields and potentials. Int. J. Neurosci. 15:1981;223-239.
31. Kyuhou S., Okada Y.C. Detection of magnetic signals from isolated transverse CA1 hippocampal slice of the guinea pig. J. Neurophysiol. 70:1993;2665-2668.
32. Lauer, E.W. Telencephalon of ungulates. In: E.C. Crosby and H.N. Schnizlein (Eds.), Comparative Correlative Neuroanatomy of the Vertebrate Telencephalon. Macmillan, New York, 1982, pp. 501-524.
33. Le J., Menon V., Gevins A. Local estimate of surface Laplacian derivation on a realistically shaped scalp surface and its performance on noisy data. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 92:1994;433-441.
34. Lopez L., Chan C.Y., Okada Y.C., Nicholson C. Multimodal characterization of population responses evoked by applied electric field in vitro: Extracellular potential, magnetic evoked field, transmembrane potential and current-source density analysis. J. Neurosci. 11:1991;1998-2010.
35. Malmivuo, J. and Plonsey, R. Bioelectromagnetism. Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
36. Meijs J.W.H., Bosch F.G.C., Peters M.J., Lopes da Silva F.H. On the magnetic field distribution generated by a dipolar current source situated in a realistically shaped compartment model of the head. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 66:1987;286-298.
37. Nakasato N., Levesque M.F., Barth D.S., Baumgartner C., Rogers R.L., Sutherling W.W. Comparisons of MEG, EEG, and ECoG source localization in neocortical partial epilepsy in humans. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 171:1994;171-178.
38. Nicholson Peterson N., Schroeder C.E., Arezzo J.C. Neural generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in the awake monkey. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 96:1995;248-260.
39. Nunez P.L., Silberstein R.B., Cadusch P.J., Wijesinghe R.S., Westdorp A.F., Srinivasan R. A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 90:1994;40-57.
40. Okada, Y.C. Neurogenesis of evoked magnetic field. In: S.J. Williamson, G.-L. Romani, L. Kaufman and I. Modena (Eds.), Biomagnetism. Plenum, New York, 1982, pp. 399-408.
41. Okada, Y.C. Recent developments on the physiological basis of magnetoencephalography. In: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink and M. Kotani (Eds.), Biomagnetism. Plenum, New York, 1989, pp. 273-278.
42. Okada Y.C., Nicholson C. Magnetic evoked field associated with transcortical currents in turtle cerebellum. Biophys. J. 53:1988;723-731.
43. Okada, Y.C. and Xu, C. Comparisons of MEG, EEG, ECoG and intracortical recordings for characterization of cortical tissues. In: M. Eiselt, U. Zwiener and H. Witte (Eds.), Quantitative and Topographical EEG and MEG Analysis. Universitätsverlag Druckhaus-Mayer, Jena, 1995, pp. 109-116.
44. Okada Y.C., Shah B., Huang J.-C. Ferromagnetic high-permeability alloy alone can provide sufficient low-frequency and eddy-current shieldings for biomagnetic measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41:1994;688-697.
45. Okada Y.C., Wu J., Kyuhou S. Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 103:1997;474-485.
46. Pinto Hamuy T., Bromiley R.B., Woolsey C.N. Somatic afferent areas I and II of dog's cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 19:1956;485-499.
47. Rose J.E. A cytoarchitectural study of the sheep cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 76:1942;1-55.
48. Salinas-Zeballos, M.-E., Zeballos, G.A. and Gootman, P.M. A stereotaxic atlas of the developing swine (Sus scrofa) forebrain. In: M.-L. Tootleson (Ed.), Swine in Biomedical Research. Plenum, New York, 1986, pp. 887-906.
49. Simpson S., King J.L. Localisation of the motor area in the sheep. Q. J. Exp. Physiol., 4:1911;53-65.
50. Solnitzky O. The hypothalamus and subthalamus of Sus scrofa. J. Comp. Neurol. 70:1939;191-229.
51. Solnitzky O. The thalamic nuclei of Sus scrofa. J. Comp. Neurol. 69:1938;121-169.
52. Sutherling W.W., Crandall P.H., Darcey T.M., Becker D.P., Levesque M.F., Barth D.S. The magnetic and electrical fields agree with intracranial localizations of somatosensory cortex. Neurology. 38:1988;1705-1714.
53. Sutherling, W.W., Nakasato, N., Muresan, L., Vinet, L., Baumgartner, C. and Barth, D. Comparison of EEG, ECoG, MRI and seven versus 31 channels of MEG for noninvasive localization of the somatosensory response. In: M. Hoke, S.N. Erné, Y.C. Okada and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 233-236.
54. Williamson, S.J. and Kaufman, L. Biomagnetism. J. Mag. Magn. Mater., 1981a, 22: 129-201.
55. Williamson, S.J. and Kaufman, L. Magnetic fields of the cerebral cortex. In: S.N. Erné, H.-D. Hahlbohm and H. Lübbig (Eds.), Biomagnetism. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1981b, pp. 353-402.
56. Wood C.C., Cohen D., Cuffin B.N., Yarita M., Allison T. Electrical sources in the human somatosensory cortex: identification by combined magnetic and electric potential recordings. Science. 227:1985;1051-1053.
57. Woolsey C.N., Fairman D. Contralateral, ipsilateral and bilateral representation of cutaneous receptors in somatic areas I and II of the cerebral cortex of pig, sheep and other animals. Surgery. 19:1946;684-702.
58. Yoshikawa, T. Atlas of the Brains of Domestic Animals. Penn. State University Press, University Park, PA, 1968.