Monitoring of processes with multiple operating modes through multiple principle component analysis models

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 43, Issue 22, 2004, Pages 7025-7035

  Zhao, Shi Jian ^a   Zhang, Jie ^b   Xu, Yong Mao ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYTIC CRACKING; ERROR ANALYSIS; FLUIDIZATION; MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; PROCESS CONTROL; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT; FALSE ALARM; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL PROCESS MONITORING (MSPM); PREDICTION ERROR;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

PROCESS CONTROL;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS MONITORING; STEADY STATE;

EID: 6344249065     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0497893     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Martin, E. B.; Morris, A. J.; Zhang, J. Process performance monitoring using multivariate statistical process control. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 1996, 143, 132-144.
2. Qin, S. J. Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond. J. Chemom. 2003, 17, 480-502.
3. Li, W.; Yue, H. H.; Valle-Cervantes, S.; Qin, S. J. Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 471-486.
4. Flury, B. K. Two Genealizations of the Common Principal Component Model. Biometrika 1987, 74 (1), 59-69.
5. Lane, S.; Martin, E. B.; Kooijmans, R.; Morris, A. J. Performance monitoring of a multi-product semi-batch process. J. Process Control 2001, 11, 1-11.
6. Hwang, D.-H.; Han, C. Real-time monitoring for a process with multiple operating modes. Control Eng. Pract. 1999, 7, 891-902.
7. Golub, G. H.; Van Loan, C. F. Matrix Computations, 3rd ed.; The Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, MA, 1996.
8. Björck, Å.; Golub, G. H. Numerical Methods for Computing Angles Between Linear Subspaces. Math. Comput. 1973, 27(123), July, 579-594.
9. Ramsay, J. O.; Berge, J. T.; Styan, G. P. H. Matrix Correlation. Psychometrika 1984, 49 (3), 403-423.
10. Knyazev, A. V.; Argentati, M. E. Principal Angles between Subspaces in an A-Based Scalar Product: Algorithms and Perturbation Estimates. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2002, 23 (6), 2008-2040.
11. Jackson, J. E. A User's Guide to Principal Components; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991.
12. Wold, S. Cross-Validatory Estimation of the Number of Components in Factor and Principal Components Models. Technometrics 1978, 20 (4), 397-405.
13. Krzanowski, W. J. Between-group comparison of Principal Components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1979, 74 (367), 703-707.
14. Tukey, J. W. Exploratory Data Analysis; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1977.
15. Donoho, D. L. Denoising by soft thresholding; Technical Report; Department of Statistics, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, 1992.
16. Donoho, D. L. Nonlinear Wavelet Methods for Recovery of Signals, Densities, and Spectra from Indirect and Noisy Data. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics; American Mathematical Society. Providence, RI, 1993; Vol. 00.
17. Strang, G.; Nguyen, T. Wavelets and filter banks; Wellesley: Wellesley-Cambridge, 1996.
18. Zhao, S. J.; Xu, Y. M.; Zhang, J. A Multiple PCA Model based Technique for the Monitoring of Processes with Multiple Operating Modes. In European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering-14. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering; Barbosa-Póvoa, A., Matos, H., Eds.; Elsevier BV: Lisbon, Portugal, 2004; Vol. 18, pp 865-870.
19. Nomikos, P.; MacGregor, J. F. Multivariate SPC Charts for Monitoring Batch Processes. Technometrics 1995, 37 (1), 41-59.
20. Qin, S. J. Recursive PLS algorithms for adaptive data modeling. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1998, 22 (4/5), 503-514.
21. Dong, D.; McAvoy, T. J. Nonlinear principal component analysis-based on principal curves and neural networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 20 (1), 65-78.
22. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. A Plant-wide Industrial Process Control Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17 (3), 245-255.
23. Ricker, N. L.; Lee, J. H. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19 (9), 961-981.
24. McAvoy, T. J.; Ye, N. Base Control for the Tennessee Eastman Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18 (5), 383-413.
25. Ricker, N. L. Model predictive control of a continuous, nonlinear, two-phase reactor. J. Process Control 1993, 3 (2), 109-123.
26. Lyman, P. R.; Georgakis, C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19 (3), 321-331.
27. Ricker, N. L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman Chanllenge Process. J. Process Control 1996, 6 (4), 205-221.
28. Ricker, N. L. Optimal Steady-state Operation of the Tennessee Eastman Chanlenge Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19 (9), 949-959.
29. Ricker, N. L. Tennessee Eastman Challenge Archive. Available at http://depts.washington.edu/control/LARRY/TE/download.html, 1999.
30. Johannesmeyer, M. C.; Singhal, A.; Seborg, D. E. Pattern Matching in Historical Data. AIChE J. 2002, 48 (9), 2022-2038.