Using collaborative filtering algorithms as eLearning tools

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Loll, Frank ^a   Pinkwart, Niels ^a  

^a CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATIONS; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; STUDENTS;

COLLABORATIVE FILTERING; COLLABORATIVE FILTERING ALGORITHMS; COLLABORATIVE INFORMATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; E-LEARNING APPLICATIONS; E-LEARNING TOOLS; PEER EVALUATIONS; PREDICTION QUALITIES; PRODUCT RECOMMENDATIONS; TASK TYPES; WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS;

SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;

EID: 63349101001     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.492     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Goldberg, David; David Nichols, Brain M. Oki, Douglas Terry (1992). "Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry". Communications of the ACM 35 (12): 61-70
2. Dancer, W. T., & Dancer, J. (1992). Peer rating in higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 67, 306-309.
3. Mathews, B. (1994). Assessing individual contributions: Experience of peer evaluation in major group projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 19-28.
4. Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 205-221.
5. Lynch, C., Ashley, K., Aleven, V., & Pinkwart, N. (2006). Defining Ill-Defined Domains; A literature survey. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (p. 1-10). Jhongli (Taiwan), National Central University.
6. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, Vol. 48 (3)
7. J. Surowiecki (2004): The wisdom of crowds. Doubleday.
8. Gehringer, E. F. (2000). Strategies and Mechanisms for Electronic Peer Review. In: 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, p. F1B-2 - F1B-7.
9. Gehringer, E. F. (2001). Electronic Peer Review and Peer Grading in Computer-Science Courses. In: Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, February 2001, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, pp. 139 - 143.
10. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., Wilson R. W. (2006). Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing From Instructor and Student Perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 891-901
11. Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., & Lynch, C. (2006). Toward Legal Argument Instruction with Graph Grammars and Collaborative Filtering Techniques. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4053 (p. 227-236). Berlin (Germany), Springer.
12. Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., & Lynch, C. (2007). Evaluating Legal Argument Instruction with Graphical Representations Using LARGO. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (p. 101-108). IOS Press.
13. Walker, A., Recker, M. M., Lawless, K., Wiley D. (2004). Collaborative Information Filtering: a review and an educational application. International Journal of AIED, Vol. 14, No. 1/2004 - pp. 3-28
14. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75.
15. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No. 3.