E-file adoption: A study of U.S. taxpayers' intentions

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Schaupp, Ludwig Christian ^a   Carter, Lemuria ^b   Hobbs, Jeff ^c  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E filing; IT adoption; Optimism bias

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE MODELS; E GOVERNMENTS; E-FILING; FACILITATING CONDITIONS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTIONS; IT ADOPTION; ONLINE TRUSTS; OPTIMISM BIAS; PERCEIVED RISKS; PERCEPTIONS OF TRUSTS; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; SOCIAL INFLUENCES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; TAXATION;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 63349089115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.171     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. IRS, IRS e-Strategy for Growth. 2004.
2. Economist, T., The Good, Bad, and the Inevitable, in A Special Report on Government and Technology. 2008.
3. Fletcher, P.D., E-file: Electronic tax administration in the United States. 2002.
4. Fu, J.R., C.K. Farn, and W.P. Chao, Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management, 2006. 43: p. 109-126.
5. VanDenburgh, W.M. and P.J. Harmelink, The IRS's lack of support for Direct, Free E-Filing. Tax Notes, 2006. 112: p. 171-182.
6. Service, I.R., IRS e-file for Individuals. 2008.
7. Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, and G.B. Davis, User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 2003. 27(3): p. 425-478.
8. Al Awadhi, S. and A. Morris. The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-government Services in Kuwait. in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2008. Kona, Hawaii.
9. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989. 13(3): p. 319-340.
10. Thompson, R., C. Higgins, and J. Howell, Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 1991. 15(1): p. 124-143.
11. Moore, G. and I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 1991. 2(3): p. 192-222.
12. Plouffe, C.R., S.J. Hulland, and M. Vandenbosch, Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 2001. 12(2): p. 208-222.
13. Compeau, D.R. and C.A. Higgins, Computer Self-efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 1995. 19(2): p. 189-211.
14. Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad, Are individual differences germane to acceptance of new info. technologies? Decision Sciences, 1999. 30(2): p. 361-391.
15. Venkatesh, V., Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 2000. 11(4): p. 342-365.
16. Thompson, R., C. Higgins, and J. Howell, Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1994. 11(1): p. 167-187.
17. Warkentin, M., et al., Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets: The International Journal of Electronic Commerce & Business Media, 2002. 12(3): p. 157-162.
18. Warkentin, M. and D. Gefen, Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 2002. 12(3): p. 157-162.
19. Pavlou, P., Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2003. 7: p. 69-103.
20. Carter, L. and F. Belanger., The Utilization of E-government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal, 2005. 15(1): p. 2-25.
21. Rotter, J., New Scale for Measurement of Interpersonal Trust. Journal of Personality, 1967. 35: p. 651-665.
22. Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis, and F.D. Schoorman, An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995. 20(3): p. 709-734.
23. Zucker, L.G., Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1986. 8: p. 53-111.
24. Gefen, D., E-commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 2000. 28(6): p. 725-737.
25. Gefen, D., Reflections on the Dimensions of Trust and Trustworthiness among Online Consumers. The DATA BASE for Advances in IS, 2002. 33(3): p. 38-53.
26. Gefen, D., E. Karahanna, and D.W. Straub, Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 2003. 27(1): p. 51-90.
27. Gefen, D. and D.W. Straub, Consumer Trust in B2C e-Commerce and the Importance of Social Presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 2004. 32(6): p. 407-424.
28. Jarvenpaa, S.L., N. Tractinsky, and M. Vitale, Consumer Trust In An Internet Store. Information Technology and Management, 2000. 1(1): p. 45-71.
29. McKnight, D.H., V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar, Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-Commerce: An Integrative Approach. Information Systems Research, 2002. 13(3): p. 334-359.
30. Tan, Y.H. and W. Theon, Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2001. 5(2): p. 61-74.
31. Van Slyke, C., F. Belanger, and C.L. Comunale, Factors Influencing the Adoption of Web-Based Shopping: The Impact of Trust. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 2004. 35(2): p. 32-49.
32. Gefen, D., et al., Cultural diversity and trust in IT adoption: a comparison of potential e-Voters in the USA and South Africa. Journal of Global Information Management, 2002. 13(1): p. 54-78.
33. Welch, E.W., C.C. Hinnant, and M.J. Moon, Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2005. 15(3): p. 371-391.
34. Doney, P.M. and J.P. Cannon, An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1997. 61(April): p. 35-51.
35. Chiles, T.H. and J.F. McMackin, Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 1996. 21: p. 73-99.
36. Ruyter, K.D., M. Wetzels, and M. Kleijnen, Customer adoption of eservice: An experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2001. 12(2): p. 184-207.
37. Smith, J.B. and D.W. Barclay, The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1997. 61(1): p. 3-22.
38. Weinstein, N.D., Optimistic Bias about personal risks. Science, 1980. 246: p. 1232-1233.
39. Dejoy, D., The Optimism Bias and Traffic Accident Risk Perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1989. 21(4): p. 333-340.
40. Sjoberg, L. and J. Fromm, Information Technology Risks as Seen by the Public. Risk Analysis, 2001. 21(3): p. 427-441.
41. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory. 1978, New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Anderson, J.C. and D.W. Gerbing, Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988. 103(3): p. 411-423.
43. Netemeyer, R.G., M.W. Johnston, and S. Burton, Analysis of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity in a Structural Equations Framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990. 75(2): p. 148-157.
44. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981. 18(1): p. 39-50.
45. Barclay, D.W. and J.B. Smith, The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1997. 61(1): p. 3-21.
46. Hoyle, R.H., The Structural Equation Modeling Approach: Basic Concepts and Fundamental Issues. 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Chin, W.W. and P.A. Todd, On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 1995. 19(2): p. 237-246.
48. Steiger, J.H. and J.C. Lind. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. in Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society. 1980. Iowa City.
49. Segars, A.H. and V. Grover, Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 1993. 17(4): p. 517-525.
50. Browne, M.W. and R. Cudeck, Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. 1993.
51. Suh, B. and I. Han, The Impact of Customer Trust and Perception of Security Control on the Acceptance of Electronic Commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2003. 7(3): p. 135-161.