Students' overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems: how numbers may change solutions

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 187-211

  Dooren, Wim Van ^a   Bock, Dirk De ^a   Evers, Marleen ^a   Verschaffel, Lieven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Arithmetic; Elementary; K 8; Mathematical modeling; Percent; Problem solving; Proportion; Ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749186054     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bell, A., Fischbein, E., & Greer, B. (1984). Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 129-147.
2. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (Edited and translated by N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190.
4. Cooper, M., & Sakane, H. (1986). Comparative experimental study on children's strategies when deriving a mathematical law. In London Institute of Education (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 41&-414). London: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
5. Cramer, K., & Post, T. (1993). Proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teacher, 86, 404-407.
6. Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 159-178). New York: Macmillan.
7. De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Improper use of linear reasoning: An in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students' errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 311-334.
8. De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., Janssens, D., Van Dooren, W., & Claes K. (2003). Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students' performance? Negative evidence from a study on modelling non-linear geometry problems. Learning and Instruction, 13, 441-463.
9. Eckenstam, A., & Greger, K. (1983). Some aspects of children's ability to solve mathematical problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 369-384.
10. Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students' reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 194-229.
11. Esteley, C, Villarreal, M., & Alagia, H. (2004). Extending linear models to non-linear contexts: An in-depth study about two university students' mathematical productions. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 343-350). Bergen, Norway: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
12. Evers, M. (2006). De invloed van getalstructuren op het onterecht proportioneel redeneren [The influence of number structures on improper proportional reasoning]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium.
13. Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 11-50.
14. Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 3-17.
15. Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 1-24.
16. Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 96-105.
17. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
18. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
19. Gillard, E., Van Dooren, W., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Proportional reasoning as a heuristic-based process: In search for evidence in students' reaction times. In S. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, A. Protopapas (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 553-558). London: Taylor and Francis.
20. Gillard, E., Van Dooren, W., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (in press). The overuse of proportionality as a heuristic based process. Experimental Psychology.
21. Greer, B. (1987). Nonconservation of multiplication and division involving decimals. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 37-45.
22. Greer, B. (1993). The mathematical modelling perspective on wor(l)d problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 239-250.
23. Harel, G., & Behr, M. (1989). Structure and hierarchy of missing value proportion problems and their representation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 8, 77--119.
24. Hart, K. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. London: Murray.
25. Hart, K. (1984). Ratio: Children's strategies and errors. Windsor, United Kingdom: NFER Nelson.
26. Hatano, G. (2003). Foreword. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. xi-xiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
28. Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing-value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 235-287). New York: State University of New York Press.
29. Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 45-89). New York: Academic Press.
30. Lamprianou, T. A., & Williams, J. (2002). A developmental scale for assessing probabilistic thinking and the tendency to use a representativeness heuristic. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 9-16). Norwich, United Kingdom: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
31. Lee, L. (1996). An initiation into algebraic culture through generalization activities. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 87-106). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
32. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism. Models and modeling perspectives on mathematical problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Lesh, R., Lester, F. K., & Hjalmarson, M. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on metacogni-tive functioning in everyday situations where problem solvers develop mathematical constructs. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 383-404). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93-118). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
35. Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13-22.
36. Lin, F.-L., & Yang, K.-L. (2004). Differentiation of students' reasoning on linear and quadratic geometric number patterns. In M. J. H0ines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 457-464). Bergen, Norway: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
37. Linchevski, L., Olivier, A., Sasman, M., & Liebenberg, R. (1998). Moments of conflict and moments of conviction in generalising. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 215-222). Stellenbosch, South Africa: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
38. Marton,F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. (1997). Decreetvanjuli 1997 tot bekrachtiging van de ontwik-kelingsdoelen en eindtermen van hetgewoon basisonderwijs [Decree of July 1997 to ratify the development goals and standards of primary education]. Brussels: Author.
40. Modestou, M., Gagatsis, A., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2004). Students' improper proportional reasoning: The case of area and volume of rectangular figures. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology ofMathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 345-352). Bergen, Norway: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
41. Nesher, P. (1996). School stereotype word problems and the open nature of applications. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), Selected lectures from the 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 335-343). Sevilla, Spain: Doble Cero.
42. Onderwijssecretariaat van de Steden en Gemeenten van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. (1998). Leerplan Wiskunde voor de Basisschool [Mathematics syllabus for elementary school]. Brussels: Author.
43. Orton, J. & Orton, A. (1994). Students' perception and use of pattern and generalization. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 407-414). Lisbon, Portugal: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
44. Pedagogische Begeleidingsdienst van het Gemeenschapsonderwijs. (2007). Leerplannen basisonder-wijs wiskunde [Syllabi for elementary school mathematics]. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://pbd.gemeenschapsonderwijs.net/ Ieerplannenbao/leerplannenbao/lager/wiskunde.pdf
45. Reusser, K., & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution: The suspension of reality and sense-making in the culture of school mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 7, 309-328.
46. Sowder, L. (1988). Children's solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227-238.
47. Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147-164.
48. Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., & Koch, G. G. (2000). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
49. Taplin, M. (1995). Spatial patterning: A pilot study of pattern formation and generalization. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology ofMathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 42-49). Recife, Brazil: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
50. Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 181-204.
51. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Depaepe, F., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2003). The illusion of linearity: Expanding the evidence towards probabilistic reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 113-138.
52. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Remedying secondary school students' illusion of linearity: A teaching experiment aiming at conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 14, 485-501.
53. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2005). Not everything is proportional: Effects of age and problem type on propensities for overgeneralization. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 57-86.
54. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Students' over-reliance on linear methods: A scholastic effect? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 307-321.
55. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The linear imperative: An inventory and conceptual analysis of students' overuse of linearity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 311-342.
56. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (in press). Just answering ⋯ or thinking? Contrasting pupils' solutions and classifications of proportional and non-proportional word problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
57. Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127-174). New York: Academic Press.
58. Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol. 2, pp. 141-161). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
59. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modeling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction, 4, 273-294.
60. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
61. Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Basisonderwijs. (1998). Leerplan Wiskunde [Mathematics syllabus]. Brussels: Author.
62. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 91-111.
63. Wyndhamn, J., & Säljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning: A study of children's mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction, 7,361-382.