Experimental dissociations between memory measures: Influence of retrieval strategies

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 39-55

  Willems, Sylvie ^a   Linden, Martial Van der ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fluency; Mere exposure effect; Priming; Recognition; Strategy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEMORY; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; ROTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CUES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION;

EID: 62749109100     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Begg I., and Armour V. Repetition and the ring of truth. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 23 (1991) 195-213
2. Bonnanno G.A., and Stillings N.A. Preference, familiarity and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. American Journal of Psychology 99 (1986) 403-415
3. Bornstein R.F. Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin 106 (1989) 265-289
4. Bornstein R.F., and D'Agostino P.R. Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (1992) 545-552
5. Bornstein R.F., and D'Agostino P.R. The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition 12 (1994) 103-128
6. Butler L.T., Berry D.C., and Helman S. Dissociating mere exposure and repetition priming as a function of word type. Memory & Cognition 5 (2004) 759-767
7. Carrasco M., and Seamon J.G. Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3 (1996) 344-351
8. Cooper L.A., and Schacter D.L. Dissociations between structural and episodic representations of visual objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1 (1992) 141-146
9. Cooper L.A., Schacter D.L., Ballesteros S., and Moore C. Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 43-57
10. Gardiner J.M. Generation and priming effects in word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (1988) 495-501
11. Goldinger S.D., Kleider H.M., and Shelley E. The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Memory & Cognition 27 (1999) 328-338
12. Hamann S.B., and Squire L.R. Intact priming for novel perceptual representations in amnesia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 (1997) 699-713
13. Holbrook J.B., Bost P.R., and Cave C.B. The effects of study-task relevance on perceptual repetition priming. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 380-392
14. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (1991) 513-541
15. Jacoby L.L., and Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110 (1981) 306-340
16. Jones B.C., Little A.C., and Perrett D.I. Why are symmetrical faces attractive?. In: Shohov S.P. (Ed). Advances in psychology research (2003), Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, US 145-166
17. Kelley C.M., and Rhodes M.G. Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. In: Ross B.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory Vol. 41 (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US 293-320
18. Kunst-Wilson W.R., and Zajonc R.B. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207 (1980) 557-558
19. Liu T., and Cooper L.A. The influence of task requirements on priming in object decision and matching. Memory & Cognition 29 (2001) 874-882
20. Lombardo S. Event and decay of the aesthetic experience. Empirical Studies of the Arts 9 (1991) 123-141
21. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 87 (1980) 252-271
22. Mandler G., Nakamura Y., and Van Zandt B.J. Nonspecific effects of exposure to stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13 (1987) 646-648
23. Marsolek E.D., and Burgund C.J. Initial storage of unfamiliar objects: Examining memory stores with signal detection analyses. Acta Psychologica 19 (2005) 81-106
24. Masson M.E.J., and Caldwell J.I. Conceptually driven encoding episodes create perceptual misattributions. Acta Psychologica 98 (1998) 183-210
25. McKoon G., and Ratcliff R. How should implicit memory phenomena be modeled?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 777-784
26. Miller J.K., Lloyd M.E., and Westerman D.L. When does modality matter? Perceptual versus conceptual fluency-based illusions in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language 58 (2008) 1080-1094
27. Rajaram S. Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition 21 (1993) 89-102
28. Ratcliff R., and McKoon G. Bias in the priming of object decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 754-767
29. Reber R., and Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1999) 338-342
30. Reber R., Winkielman P., and Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 45-48
31. Rhodes G., Sumich A., and Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 52-58
32. Schacter D.L. Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13 (1987) 501-518
33. Schacter D.L., and Cooper L.A. Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects: Structure and function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 995-1009
34. Schacter D.L., Cooper L.A., and Delaney S.M. Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119 (1990) 5-24
35. Schacter D.L., Cooper L.A., and Delaney S.M. Implicit memory for visual objects and the structural description system. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (1990) 367-372
36. Schacter D.L., Cooper L.A., Delaney S.M., Peterson M.A., and Tharan M. Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17 (1991) 3-19
37. Schacter D.L., Cooper L.A., Tharan M., and Rubens A.B. Preserved priming of novel objects in patients with memory disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3 (1991) 118-131
38. Seamon J., Brody N., and Kauff D.M. Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9 (1983) 544-555
39. Seamon J., Brody N., and Kauff D.M. Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1983) 187-189
40. Seamon J.G., and Delgado M.R. Recognition memory and affective preference for depth-rotated solid objects: Part-based structural descriptions may underlie the mere exposure effect. Visual Cognition 6 (1999) 145-164
41. Seamon J.G., Ganor Stern D., Crowley M.J., Wilson S.M., Weber W.J., O'Rourke C.M., et al. A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition. Memory & Cognition 25 (1997) 367-374
42. Seamon J.G., Williams P.C., Crowley M.J., Kim I.J., et al. The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 711-721
43. Shepard R.N., and Cooper L.A. Mental images and their transformations (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Silvera D.H., Josephs R.A., and Giesler R.B. Bigger is better: The influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 (2002) 189-202
45. Stark C.E.L., and Squire L.R. Recognition memory and familiarity judgments in severe amnesia: No evidence for a contribution of repetition priming. Behavioral Neuroscience 114 (2000) 459-467
46. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995) 55-82
47. Toth J.P., and Daniels K.A. Effects of prior experience on judgments of normative word frequency: Automatic bias and correction. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 845-874
48. Verfaellie M., and Cermak L.S. Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. Neuropsychology 13 (1999) 198-205
49. Wagner A.D., and Gabrieli J.D.E. On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: Evidence for distinct mnemonic processes. Acta Psychologica 98 (1998) 211-230
50. Wagner A.D., Gabrieli J.D.E., and Verfaellie M. Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 305-323
51. Westerman D.L., Lloyd M.E., and Miller J.K. The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 607-617
52. Westerman D.L., Miller J.K., and Lloyd M.E. Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 619-629
53. Whittlesea B.W.A., and Price J.R. Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/non-analytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition 29 (2001) 234-246
54. Whittlesea B.W.A., and Williams L.D. Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica 98 (1998) 141-165
55. Whittlesea B.W.A., and Williams L.D. The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 547-565
56. Whittlesea B.W.A., and Williams L.D. The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 14-33
57. Whittlesea B.W.A., and Williams L.D. The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 3-13
58. Willems, S., Salmon, E., Van der Linden, M. (in press). Implicit/explicit memory dissociation in Alzheimer's disease: The consequence of inappropriate processing?. Neuropsychology.
59. Willems S., and Van der Linden M. Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency-preference links. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 323-341
60. Willems S., Van der Linden M., and Bastin C. The contribution of perceptual fluency to familiarity-based recognition and preference: A study of the effects of stimulus similarity and the fluency expectation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (2007) 119-140
61. Williams P., and Tarr M.J. Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 1344-1361
62. Williams P., and Tarr M.J. Orientation-specific possibility priming for novel three-dimensional objects. Perception & Psychophysics 61 5 (1999) 963-976