Recognition memory and affective preference for depth-rotated solid objects: Part-based structural descriptions may underlie the mere exposure effect

Visual Cognition

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 145-164

  Seamon, John G ^a   Delgado, Mauricio R ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008681273     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713756806     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
2. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bulthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
5. Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
6. Bornstein, R.F., Leone, D.R., & Galley, D.J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1070-1079.
7. Cave, C.B., & Squire, L.R. (1992). Intact and long lasting priming in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 509-520.
8. Cooper, E.E., Biederman, I., & Hummel, J.E. (1992). Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 191-214.
9. Cooper, L.A., & Schacter, D.L. (1992). Dissociations between structural and episodic representations of visual objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 141-146.
10. Cooper, L.A., Schacter, D.L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
11. Farah, M.J. (1992). Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain specificity in visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 164-169.
12. Graf, P., & Schacter, D.L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 501-508.
13. Harrison, A.A. (1977). Mere exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 39-83). New York: Academic Press.
14. Hummel, J.E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
15. Humphrey, G.K., & Khan, S.C. (1992). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 170-190.
16. Humphreys, G.W., & Bruce, V. (1989). Visual cognition: Computational, experimental, and neuropsychological perspectives. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
17. Humphreys, G.W., & Quinlan, P.T. (1988). Priming effects between two-dimensional shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 203-220.
18. Jolicoeur, P (1987). A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Memory and Cognition, 15, 531-543.
19. Kolers, P.A., Duchnicky, R.L., & Sundstroem, G. (1985). Size in visual processing of faces and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 726-751.
20. Kunst-Wilson, W.R., & Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
21. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H.K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 200, 269-294.
22. Milliken, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (1992). Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Memory and Cognition, 20, 83-95.
23. Moscovitch, M., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Vriezen, E. (1994). Memory without conscious recollection: A tutorial review from a neuropsychological perspective. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Roediger, H.L., III, & Srinivas, K (1993). Specificity of operations in perceptual priming. In P. Graf & M.E.J. Masson (Eds), Implicit memory: New directions incongition, development, and neuropsychology Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
25. Schacter, D.L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
26. Schacter, D.L., Cooper, L.A., & Delaney, S.M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5-24.
27. Schacter, D.L., Cooper, L.A., Delaney, S.M., Peterson, M.A., & Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of strutural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 3-19.
28. Schacter, D.L., Cooper, L.A., & Treadwell, J. (1993). Preserved priming of novel objects across size transformations in amnesic patients. Psychological Science, 4, 331-335.
29. Seamon, J.G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D.M. (1983a). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 544-555.
30. Seamon, J.G., Brody, N., & Kauf, D.M. (1983b). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 187-189.
31. Seamon, J.G., Ganor-Stern, D., Crowley, M.J., Wilson, S.M., Weber, W.J., O'Rourke, C.M., & Mahoney, J.K. (1997). A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or colour changes on affect and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 367-374.
32. Seamon, J.G., Marsh, R.L., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 465-469.
33. Seamon, J.G., McKenna, P.A., & Binder, N. (1998). The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgement tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 85-102.
34. Seamon, J.G., Williams, P.C., Crowley, M.J., Kim, I.J., Langer, S.A., Orne, P.J., & Wishengrad, D.L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recogntion and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cogntion, 21, 711-721.
35. Squire, L.R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195-231.
36. Srinivas, K. (1993). Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 582-602.
37. Srinivas, K. (1995). The representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1019-1036.
38. Tarr, M.J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
39. Tarr, M.J., & Bulthoff, H.H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
40. Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9, (No. 2, Pt. 2), 1-27.
41. Zimmer, H.D. (1995). Size and orientation of objects in explicity and implicity memory: A reversal of the dissociation between perceptual similarity and type of test. Psychological Research, 57, 260-273.