Learning scenes from multiple views: Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 90-99

  Waller, David ^a   Friedman, Alinda ^b   Hodgson, Eric ^a   Greenauer, Nathan ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 62649086222     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.1.90     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60-64.
2. CLEVELAND, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 829-836.
3. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition Psychological Science, 8, 302-307. (Pubitemid 127100229)
4. EDELMAN, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
6. EDELMAN, S., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & BÜLTHOFF, I. (1999). Effects of parametric manipulation of inter-stimulus similarity on 3D object categorization. Spatial Vision, 12, 107-123.
7. FRIEDMAN, A., SPETCH, M. L., & FERREY, A. (2005). Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 149-162. (Pubitemid 40687789)
8. FRIEDMAN, A., & WALLER, D. (2008). View combination in scene recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 467-478. (Pubitemid 351928491)
9. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
10. KNOWLTON, B. J., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747-1749. (Pubitemid 24030101)
11. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
12. MOU, W., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162-170.
13. PALMER, S., ROSCH, E., & CHASE, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. PALMERI, T. J., & FLANERY, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. Psychological Science, 10, 526-530.
15. POSNER, M. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
16. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310. (Pubitemid 33646292)
17. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
18. ULLMAN, S. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views. Cognition, 67, 21-44. (Pubitemid 128431116)
19. ZAKI, S. R., & NOSOFSKY, R. M. (2007). A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: Dramatic effects of category learning during test. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2088-2096.