Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CTL Romano

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 975, 2009, Pages 204-211

  Romano, L ^a   Grazioli, L ^b   Bonomo, L ^c   Xu, J R ^d   Chen, K M ^e   Dore, R ^f   Vanzualli, A ^g   Catalano, C ^h  

^a CARDARELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

^c FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

^d SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^e SHANGHAI SECOND MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

^g OSPEDALE NIGUARDA CA GRANDA   (Italy)

^h SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL; IODIXANOL 320; IOMEPROL; IOMEPROL 400; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IODOBENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; IOPAMIDOL;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INJECTION SITE REACTION; LIVER PARENCHYMA; LYMPHEDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MUSCLE SPASM; NAUSEA; PATIENT SAFETY; PORTAL VEIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; URTICARIA; VOMITING; ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG INTERACTION; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LIVER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG INTERACTIONS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; IOPAMIDOL; LIVER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PORTAL VEIN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 62449157757     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/93627766     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brink JA. Contrast optimization and scan timing for single and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:S3-8.
2. Fleischmann D. Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 2003;13:M14-20.
3. Marchiano A, Spreafico C, Lanocita R, Frigerio L, Di Tolla G, Patelli G, et al. Does iodine concentration affect the diagnostic efficacy of biphasic spiral CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? Abdom Imaging 2005;30:274-80.
4. Schoellnast H, Brader P, Oberdabernig B, Pisail B, Deutschmann HA, Fritz GA, et al. High-concentration contrast media in multiphasic abdominal multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of increased iodine flow rate on parenchymal and vascular enhancement. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:582-7.
5. Awai K, Nakayama Y, Nakaura T, Yanaga Y, Tamura Y, Hatemura M, et al. Prediction of aortic peak enhancement in monophasic contrast injection protocols at multidetector CT: phantom and patient studies. Radiat Med 2007;25:14-21.
6. Katayama H, Spinazzi A, Fouillet X, Kirchin MA, Taroni P, Davies A. Iomeprol: current and future profile of a radiocontrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:87-96.
7. Pugh ND. Haemodynamic and rheological effects of contrast media: the role of viscosity and osmolality. Eur Radiol 1996;6:S13-5.
8. König M, Bü ltmann E, Bode-Schnurbus L, Koenen D, ielke E, Heuser L. Image quality in CT perfusion imaging of the brain. The role of iodine concentration. Eur Radiol 2007;17:39-47.
9. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, McFadden EP, Stijnen T, de Feyter PJ, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005;236:661-5.
10. Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van der Lugt A, et al. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400. Invest Radiol 2006;41:349-53.
11. Fishman EK. Multidetector-row computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease: the importance of heart rate. Eur Heart J 2005;7:G4-12.
12. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, Belgrano M, Malagutti P, Meijboom BW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2006;22:101-5.
13. Hoffmann MHK, Shi H, Manzke R, Schmid FT, De Vries L,Grass M, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005;234:86-97.
14. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-85.
15. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Erley CM, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, Ni Z, et al. The ACTIVE trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of Iomeprol-400 and Iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2008;43:170-8.
16. Brink JA. Use of high concentration contrast media (HCCM): principles and rationale-body CT. Eur J Radiol 2003;45:S53-8.
17. Catalano C, Laghi A, Reitano I, Brillo R, Passariello R. Optimization of contrast agent administration in MSCT angiography. Acad Radiol 2002;9:S361-3.
18. Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, Hori S. Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 2002;224:757-763.
19. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, Satake H, Ota T, Ishigaki T. Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver with a multislice CT scanner: effects of iodine concentration and delivery rate. Radiat Med 2005;23:61-9.
20. Tozaki M, Naruo K, Fukuda K. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT of the liver: analysis of the effect of different iodine concentrations with the same total iodine dose in the same chronic liver disease patients. Radiat Med 2005;23:533-8.
21. Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T, Koike S, Shimizu A, Matsunaga N. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease. Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:157-62.
22. Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42:856-61.
23. Suzuki H, Shibamoto Y, Oshima H, Takeuchi M, Ito M, Hara M. Comparison of 2 contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography of the hepatic artery at multi-detector-row computed tomography: a randomized study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:840-5.
24. Pozzi Mucelli RM, Como G, Del Frate C, Iuri D, Furlan A, Al-Grhiw E, et al. Multidetector CT with double arterial phase and high-iodine-concentration contrast agent in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006;111:181-91.
25. Fenchel S, Fleiter TR, Aschoff AJ, van Gessel R, Brambs HJ, Merkle EM. Effect of iodine concentration of contrast media on contrast enhancement in multislice CT of the pancreas. Br J Radiol 2004;77:821-30.
26. Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, Garachemani A, Fleisch M, Kirchin MA, et al. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intracardiac or intra-arterial injection. Int J Cardiol 2007;118:389-96.
27. Klinke WP, Grace M, Miller R, Naqvi SZ, Roth D, Roy L. A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Clin Cardiol 1989;12:689-96.
28. Werner GS, Schmidt T, Scholz KH, Figulla HR, Kreuzer H. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;33:11-9.
29. Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, et al. Safety and cost effectiveness of highosmolality as compared with low-osmolality contast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography. N Engl J Med 1992;326:425-30.
30. Tveit K, Bolz KD, Bolstad B, Haugland T, Berg KJ, Skjaerpe T, et al. Iodixanol in cardioangiography. A double-blind parallel comparison between iodixanol 320 mg I/ml and ioxaglate 320 mg I/ml. Acta Radiol 1994;35:614-8.
31. Bergstra A, van Dijk RB, Brekke O, Buurma AE, Orozco L, den Heijer P, et al. Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;50:314-21.
32. Hill JA, Cohen MB, Kou WH, Mancini GB, Mansour M, Fountaine H, et al. Iodixanol, a new isosmotic nonionic contrast agent compared with iohexol in cardiac angiography. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:57-63.
33. Webb JA, Stacul F, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK; Members of the Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 2003;13:181-4.
34. Ho AL, O'Malley ME, Tomlinson GA. Adverse events with universal use of iodixanol for CT: comparison with iohexol. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:165-8.