Adverse events with universal use of iodixanol for CT: Comparison with iohexol

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 165-168

  Ho, Angela L ^a,b   O'Malley, Martin E ^a,d   Tomlinson, George A ^a,c  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b TORONTO EAST GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adverse event; Computed tomography; Contrast agent

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EVENTS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST AGENT; IOHEXOL;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADRENALIN; IODIXANOL; IOHEXOL;

ANAPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG FATALITY; ERYTHEMA; EYE DISCHARGE; FEMALE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROTOXICITY; OXYGEN THERAPY; PALATE ITCHING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRURITUS; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SKIN TOXICITY; THROAT DISEASE; THROAT FULLNESS; THROAT IRRITATION; THROAT SWELLING; TONGUE SWELLING; UNCONSCIOUSNESS; URTICARIA;

EID: 34147145941     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000237816.11054.09     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Palmer FJ. The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions. Final report. Australas Radiol. 1988;32:426-428.
2. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology. 1990;175:621-628.
3. Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:939-944.
4. Katzberg RW. Urography into the 21st century: new contrast media, renal handling, imaging characteristics, and nephrotoxicity. Radiology. 1997;204:297-312.
5. Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson S-G, et al. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:491-499.
6. Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1153-1161.
7. American College of Radiology. Manual on Contrast Media, version 5.0, 2004; Reston, VA: Table 3, page 55.
8. Mortele KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, et al. Universal use of non-ionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:31-34.
9. Webb JAW, Stacul F, Thomsen HS, et al. Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:181-184.
10. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2002:233.
11. Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1385-1388.
12. American College of Radiology. Manual on Contrast Media, version 5.0, 2004; Reston, VA: page 13.
13. Christiansen C. X-ray contrast media - an overview. Toxicology. 2005;209:185-187.
14. Yoshikawa H. Late adverse reactions to non-ionic contrast media. Radiology. 1992;183:737-740.
15. Mikkonen R, Kontkanen T, Kivisaari L. Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolal contrast media. Acta Radiol. 1995;36:72-76.
16. Hosoya T, Yamaguchi K, Akutsu T, et al. Delayed adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media and their risk factors. Radiat Med. 2000;18:39-45.
17. Munechika H, Hiramatsu Y, Kudo S, et al. A prospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to iohexol in urography and computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:185-194.