A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 856-861

  Sahani, Dushyant V ^a   Soulez, Gilles ^b   Chen, Ke Min ^c   Lepanto, Luigi ^b   Xu, Jian Rong ^d   Nelson, Rendon C ^e   Grazioli, Luigi ^f   Vanzulli, Angelo ^g   Heiken, Jay P ^h  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c SHANGHAI SECOND MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

^g OSPEDALE NIGUARDA CA GRANDA   (Italy)

^h WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT); Contrast media; Heart rate; Liver enhancement

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL; IOPAMIDOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; LIVER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUPINE POSITION; TACHYCARDIA;

EID: 36249028216     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181514413     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T, et al. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:157-162.
2. Fenchel S, Fleiter TR, Aschoff AJ, et al. Effect of iodine concentration of contrast media on contrast enhancement in multislice CT of the pancreas. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:821-830.
3. König M, Bultmann E, Bode-Schnurbus L, et al. Image quality in CT perfusion imaging of the brain: the role of iodine concentration. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:39-47.
4. Tozaki M, Naruo K, Fukuda K. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT of the liver: analysis of the effect of different iodine concentrations with the same total iodine dose in the same chronic liver disease patients. Radiat Med. 2005;23:533-538.
5. Schoellnast H, Brader P, Oberdabernig B, et al. High-concentration contrast media in multiphasic abdominal multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of increased iodine flow rate on parenchymal and vascular enhancement. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:582-587.
6. Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, et al. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:349-353.
7. Pannu HK, Thompson RE, Phelps J, et al. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol. Acad Radiol. 2005;12:576-584.
8. Bedard JP, Blais C, Patenaude YG, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of iso-osmolar and low-osmolarity nonionic contrast agents for contrast enhancement at CT angiography. Radiology. 2005;234:929-933.
9. Hoffmann MHK, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology. 2005;234:86-97.
10. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006;22:101-105.
11. Barrett BJ, Katzberg RW, Thomsen HS, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy after iopamidol or iodixanol in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:815-821.
12. Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2007;115:3189-3196.
13. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology. 2006;241:378-385.
14. Groen JM, Greuter MJ, van Ooijen PM, et al. Initial results on visualization of coronary artery stents at multiple heart rates on a moving heart phantom using 64-MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:812-817.
15. Poon M. Technology insight: cardiac CT angiography. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006;3:265-275.
16. Fishman EK. Multidetector-row computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease: the importance of heart rate. Eur Heart J. 2005;7(suppl G):G4-G12.
17. Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, et al. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection. Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:389-396.
18. Marchiano A, Spreafico C, Lanocita R, et al. Does iodine concentration affect the diagnostic efficacy of biphasic spiral CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:274-280.
19. Brink JA. Contrast optimization and scan timing for single and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27(suppl 1):S3-S8.
20. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, et al. Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver with a multislice CT scanner: effects of iodine concentration and delivery rate. Radiat Med. 2005;23:61-69.
21. Ichikawa T, Nakajima H, Nanbu A, et al. Effect of injection rate of contrast material on CT of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1413-1418.
22. Awai K, Nakayama Y, Nakaura T, et al. Prediction of aortic peak enhancement in monophasic contrast injection protocols at multidetector CT: phantom and patient studies. Radiat Med. 2007;25:14-21.