Thermodynamic description of bis-urea self-assembly: Competition between two supramolecular polymers

Langmuir

Volumn 24, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 14176-14182

  Bellot, Mathilde ^a   Bouteiller, Laurent ^a,b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; HYDROGEN; METABOLISM; PHASE DIAGRAMS; POLYMER SOLUTIONS; POLYMERS; SELF ASSEMBLY; TOLUENE; UREA; VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT;

ASSOCIATION MODELS; HIGH SENSITIVITIES; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRIES; NON-COVALENT INTERACTIONS; SELF- ASSEMBLIES; SELF-ASSEMBLED STRUCTURES; SMALL MOLECULES; SUPRAMOLECULAR POLYMERS; THERMODYNAMIC DESCRIPTIONS;

SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

EID: 61849171784     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la802367r     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Zimmerman, N.; Moore, J. S.; Zimmerman, S. C. Chem. Ind. 1998, 604-610.
2. Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 4071-4097.
3. Supramolecular Polymers; Ciferri, A., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2005.
4. Bouteiller, L. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2007, 207, 79-112.
5. Cordier, P.; Tournilhac, F.; Soulie-Ziakovic, C.; Leibler, L. Nature 2008, 451, 977-980.
6. Bouteiller, L.; Colombani, O.; Lortie, F.; Tereeh, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8893-8898.
7. Pinault, T.; Isare, B.; Bouteiller, L. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2006, 7, 816-819.
8. Shikata, T.; Nishida, T.; Isare, B.; Linares, M.; Lazzaroni, R.; Bouteiller, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 8459-8465.
9. (a) Boileau, S.; Bouteiller, L.; Lauprêtre, F.; Lortie, F. New J. Chem. 2000, 24, 845-848.
10. (b) Lortie, F.; Boileau, S.; Bouteiller, L.; Chassenieux, C.; Deme, B.; Ducouret, G.; Jalabert, M.; Lauprêtre, F.; Tereeh, P. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7218-7222.
11. (c) Ducouret, G.; Chassenieux, C.; Martins, S.; Lequeux, F.; Bouteiller, L. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 310, 624-629.
12. (a) van der Gucht, J.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Knoben, W.; Bouteiller, L.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 051106.
13. (b) Knoben, W.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Bouteiller, L.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 2390-2398.
14. (c) Knoben, W.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 068301.
15. (d) Knoben, W.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. Langmuir 2007, 23, 6095-6105.
16. (e) Knoben, W.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 024907.
17. (a) Chodorowski-Kimmes, S.; Livoreil, A.; Baghdadli, N.; Rodriguez. I. EP 1787681, 2007.
18. (b) Chodorowski-Kimmes, S.; Baghdadli, N.; Arnaud-Roux, M.; Garipova, G.; Bouteiller, L. EP 1797864, 2007.
19. (c) Chodorowski-Kimmes. S. EP 1864649, 2007.
20. Martin, R. B. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3043-3064.
21. Sijbesma, R. P.; Beijer, F. H.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Hirschberg, J. H. K. K.; Lange, R. F. M.: Lowe, J. K. L.; Meijer, E. W. Science 1997, 278, 1601-1604.
22. Würthner, F.; Thalacker,C.; Sautter, A.; Schärtl, W.; Ibach, W.; Hollricher, O. Chem.-Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3871-3886.
23. Berl, V.; Schmutz, M.: Krische, M. J,; Khoury, R. G.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1227-1244.
24. Xu, J.; Fogleman, E. A.; Craig, S. L. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1863-1870.
25. Stoncius, S.; Orentas, E.; Butkus, E.; Ohrström, L.; Wendt, O. F.; Wärnmark, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8272-8285.
26. Jadzyn, J.; Stockhausen, M.; Zywucki, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91. 754-757.
27. (a) Boileau, S.; Bouteiller, L.; Lortie, F. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3008-3014.
28. (b) Simic, V.; Bouteiller, L.; Jalabert, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13148-13154.
29. (c) Colombani, O.; Bouteiller, L. New J. Chem. 2004, 28. 1373-1382.
30. Zhao, D.; Moore, J. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3471-3491.
31. (a) Jonkheijm, P.; van der Schoot, P.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Meijer, E. W. Science 2006, 313, 80-83.
32. (b) Mulders, M. M. J.; Schenning. A. P. H. J.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 606-611.
33. Arnaud, A.; Belleney, J.; Boué, F.; Bouteiller, L.; Carrot. G.; Wintgens, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1718-1721.
34. Odille, F. G. J.; Jonsson, S.; Stjernqvist, S.; Ryden, T.; Wärnmark, K. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9617-9636.
35. (a) Ercolani, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 5699-5703.
36. (b) Ercolani, G.; Ioele, M.; Monti, D. New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 783-789.
37. (a) Abed, S.; Boileau, S.; Bouteiller, L.; Lacoudre, N. Polym. Bull. 1997, 39, 317-324.
38. (b) Abed, S.; Boileau, S.; Bouteiller, L. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 8479-8487.
39. (c) Abed, S.; Boileau, S.; Bouteiller, L. Polymer 2001, 42, 8613-8619.
40. Gibson, H. W.; Yamaguchi, N.; Jones, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3522-3533.
41. (a) Nyrkova, I. A.; Semenov, A. N.; Aggeli, A.; Bell, M.; Boden, N.; McLeish, T. C. B. Eur. Phys. J. B 2000, 17, 499-513.
42. (b) Aggeli, A.; Nyrkova, I. A.; Bell, M.; Harding, R.; Carrick, L.; McLeish, T. C. B.; Semenov, A. N.; Boden, N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sri. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 11857-11862.
43. Arnaud, A.; Bouteiller, L. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6858-6863.
44. 7,8 means that the hexamer is expected to be much more stable than all shorter oligomers. Consequently, a nucleus of size 6 would make more sense than a nucleus of size 2. However, including this point in the model would significantly complicate the equations. Our present aim is to find the simplest possible model accounting for the experimental results.
45. 3 excluded volume interactions may be responsible for a coupling between supramolecular growth and tube orientation. In the present system, no birefringence was detected in the absence of flow; therefore, the effect of excluded volume interactions was neglected in the model.
46. Biocalorimetry: Applications of Calorimetry in the Biological Sciences; Ladbury, J. E., Chowdhry, B. Z., Eds.; Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 1998.
47. (a) Guenet, J.-M. Thermochim. Acta 1996, 284,67-83.
48. (b) Liu, W.; Guenet, J.-M.; Green, M. M. Chirality 2004, 16, 661-664.
49. Peles-Lemli, B.; Peles-Lemli, J.; Bitter, I.; Kollar, L.; Nagy, G.; Kunsagi- Mate, S. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2007, 59, 251-256.
50. Brunsveld, L.; Zhang, H.; Glasbeek, M.; Vekemans, J. A. J. M.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6175-6182.
51. ITC experiments cannot be performed at higher concentrations because of the high viscosity of the solutions, and FTIR experiments cannot be performed at lower concentrations because of insufficient sensitivity.
52. 2 < -ΔH.
53. * is closer to twice the midpoint of the heat-flow jump (Figures S4 and S5 in the Supporting Information).
54. de Gennes, P.-G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, 1979.