The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 453-489

  Felser, Claudia ^a   Roberts, Leah ^a   Marinis, Theodore ^a   Gross, Rebecca ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Essex ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141767036     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716403000237     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adams, A., & Gathercole, S. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 95-116.
2. Adams, B., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 265-270.
3. Allen, D. (1992). The Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
5. Baccino, T., De Vincenzi, M., & Job, R. (2000). Cross-linguistic studies of the late closure strategy: French and Italian. In M. De Vincenzi & V. Lombardo (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing (pp. 89-118). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Klaas, G. (1993). New experimental setup (NESU). Unpublished manuscript, Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
7. Booth, J., MacWhinney, B., & Harasaki, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development, 71, 981-1003.
8. Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentences parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 664-695.
9. Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36, 353-372.
10. Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1999). Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory and Cognition, 27, 826-833.
11. Corley, M. (1995). The role of statistics in human sentence processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter.
12. Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73-105.
13. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D., & Corley, M. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J. Garcia-Albea, & N. Sebastian-Galles (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Dussias, P. (2001). Sentence parsing in fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 159-176). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
15. Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children's processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Essex.
16. Fernández, E. (1999), Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some preliminary results. In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 217-240). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17. Fernández, E. (2000). Bilingual sentence processing: relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
18. Ferreira, F., Henderson, J., Anes, M., Weeks, P., Jr., & McFarlane, D. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 324-335.
19. Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285-319.
20. Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
21. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-326.
23. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements and the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
24. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Parameterizing the language processing system: Left- vs. right-branching within and across language. In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universal (pp. 247-279). Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Frenck-Mestre, C. (1997). Examining second language reading: An on-line look. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcok (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA 1997 Conference on Language Acquisition (pp. 474-478). Edinburgh: Human Communications Research Center.
26. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119-148.
27. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (2002). Resolving syntactic ambiguities: Cross-linguistic differences? In M. De Vincenzi & V. Lombarde (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing (pp. 119-148). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Garnsey, S., Pearlmutter, N., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. (1977). The contribution of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58-93.
29. Gass, S. (1986). An interactionist approach to L2 sentence interpretation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 19-37.
30. Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 262-268.
31. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Cross-linguistic attachment preferences: Evidence from English and Spanish. Cognition, 59, 23-59.
32. Gibson, E., & Schütze, C. (1999). Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunction do not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 263-279.
33. Gibson, E., Schütze, C., & Salomon, A. (1996). The relationship between the frequency and the processing of linguistic structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 59-92.
34. Gilboy, E., Sopena, J., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1995). Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English compound NPs. Cognition, 54, 131-167.
35. Gross, R. (2002). "Someone shot the servant of the actress who was on the balcony, "Zur verarbeitung von relativsätzen im Deutschen und Englischen. Unpublished master's dissertation, University of Düsseldorf.
36. Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251-266.
37. Hahne, A., & A. Friederici (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123-141.
38. Harley, B., Howard, J., & Hart, G. (1995). Second language processing at different ages: Do younger learners pay more attention to prosodic cues to sentence structure? Language Learning, 45, 43-71.
39. Harrington, M. (1987). Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 351-378.
40. Harrington, M. (1992). Working memory capacity as a constraint on L2 development. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 123-134). New York: Elsevier.
41. Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The "failed functional features hypothesis." Second Language Research, 13, 187-226.
42. Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., & Scheepers, C. (1997). Modifier attachment in German: Evidence from eyetracking experiments. Unpublished manuscript, University of Freiburg.
43. Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., & Scheepers, C. (2000). Syntactic attachment and anaphor resolution: Two sides of relative clause attachment. In M. Crocker, M. Picketing, & C. Clifton (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 259-282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Henstra, J.-A. (1996). On the parsing of syntactically ambiguous sentences: Coordination and relative clause attachment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex.
45. Hernández, A., Bates, E., & Avila, L. (1994). On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish-English bilinguals: What does it mean to be "in between"? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 417-446.
46. Hurewitz, F., Brown-Schmidt, S., Thorpe, K., Gleitman, L., & Trueswell, J. (2000). One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: Factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 597-626.
47. Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb vs reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147.
48. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
49. Just, M., Carpenter, P., & Woolley, J. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
50. Kilborn, K. (1989). Sentence processing in a second language: The timing of transfer. Language and Speech, 32, 1-23.
51. Kilborn, K. (1992). On-line integration of grammatical information in a second language. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 337-351). New York: Elsevier.
52. Kilborn, K., & Ito, T. (1989). Sentence processing strategies in adults bilinguals. In B. MacWinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 257-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the competition model. In A. De Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. MacWhinney, B. (2002). Extending the competition model. In R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing. New York: Elsevier.
55. Marinis, T., Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2003). The role of lexical biases in relative clause ambiguity resolution. Unpublished manuscript, University of Essex.
56. Mazuka, R., & Lust, B. (1990). On parameter setting and parsing: Predictions for cross-linguistic differences in adult and child processing. In L. Frazier & J. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57. McDonald, J. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379-413.
58. Mitchell, D., & Cuetos, F. (1991). The origins of parsing strategies. In C. Smith (Ed.), Current Issues in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1-12). Austin, TX: Center for Cognitive Science, University of Austin.
59. Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (in press). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
60. Pienemann, M. (1998). Developmental dynamics in L1 and L2 acquisition: Processability theory and generative entrenchment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 1-20.
61. Ritchie, W., & Bhatia, T. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
62. Ritchie, W., & Bhatia, T. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of child language acquisition. San Diego, CA. Academic Press.
63. Roberts, L. (2003). Syntactic processing in learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
64. Schafer, A., Carter, J., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1996). Focus in relative clause construal. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 135-163.
65. Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2001, 2-4 November). Unheeded cues: Prosody and syntactic ambiguity in mother-child communication. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
66. Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
67. Thornton, R., MacDonald, M., & Gil, M. (1999). Pragmatic constraints on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1347-1365.
68. Traxler, M. (2002). Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 75-96.
69. Traxler, M., Pickering, M., & Clifton, C. (1998). Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 558-592.
70. Trueswell, J., Sekerina, I., Hill, N., & Logrip, M. (1999). The kindergarden-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in children. Cognition, 73, 89-134.
71. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
72. Ying, H. (1996). Multiple constraints on processing ambiguous sentences: Evidence from adult L2 learners. Language Learning, 46, 681-711.
73. Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early-closure attachment on first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 421-438.