The role of self-monitoring in literacy learning

Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 199-214

  Joseph, Laurice M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849121655     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613301     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M. A., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (1996). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bromley, K., Irwin-DeVitis, L., & Modlo, M.(1995). Graphic organizers. New York: Scholastic.
3. Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watson, S., Meadows, T. J., Weaver, A., & Jackson, B. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 31 (4), 601-616.
4. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Cunningham, P. (1999). What should we do about phonics? In L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, S. B. Neuman, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 68-89). New York: Guilford.
6. Dangel, H. L. (1989). The use of student directed spelling strategies. Academic Therapy, 25, 43-51.
7. Englett, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1992). Shared understandings: Structuring the writing experience through dialogue. In D. Carnine & E. Kameenui (Eds.), Higher order thinking (pp. 107-136). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
8. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
9. Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of good and poor readers' awareness of induced miscomprehension of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 55-64.
10. Garner, R. (1994). Metacognition and executive control. InR. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 143-158). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 251-272.
12. Harris, K., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the wiring process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
13. Heward, W. L., Gardner, R., III, Cavanaugh, S. S., Courson, F. H., Grossi, T. A., & Barbetta, P. M. (1996). Everyone participates in this class: Using response cards to increase active student response. Teaching Exceptional Children, 4-10.
14. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278.
15. Jennings, J. H. (1991). A comparison of summary and journal writing as components of an interactive comprehension model. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 67-82). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
16. Joseph, L. M. (2000). Developing first-graders' phonemic awareness, word identification, and spelling: A comparison of two contemporary phonic approaches. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(2), 160-169.
17. Joseph, L. M. (2002). Facilitating word recognition and spelling using word boxes and word sort phonic procedures. School Psychology Review, 31, 122-129.
18. Joseph, L. M., & McCachran, M. (2003). Comparison of a word study phonics technique between students with moderate to mild mental retardation and struggling readers without disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), 192-199.
19. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 458-476.
20. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disability: Com-bining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 263-283.
21. Mace, F. C., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1988). Self-monitoring: Applications and issues. In J. Witt, S. Elliot, & F. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of be therapy in education (pp. 489-502). New York: Pergamon.
22. MacQuarrie, L. L., Tucker, J.A., Burns, M.K., & Hartman, B. (2002). Comparison of retention rates using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 584-595.
23. Maslanka, P., & Joseph, L. M. (2002). A comparison of two phonological awareness techniques between samples of preschool children. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 23, 271-288.
24. McAllister, P. (1994). Using K-W-L for informal assessment. The Reading Teacher, 47, 510-511.
25. McCormick, S. (1999). Instructing students who have literacy problems (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Miholic, V. (1994). An inventory to pique students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Reading, 38, 84-86.
27. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
28. Morris, D., Shaw, B., & Perney, J. (1990). Helping low readers in grades 2 and 3: An after school volunteer tutoring program. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 133-150.
29. Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
30. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
31. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Pereira-Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology: An International Journal, 18, 185-235.
33. Phillips, L. M. (1988). Young readers' inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 193-222.
34. Pratt-Struthers, J., Struthers, J., & Williams, R. (1983). The effects of the add-a-word spelling program on spelling accuracy during creative writing. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 277-283.
35. Pressley, M. (1999). Self-regulated comprehension processing and its development through instruction. In L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, S. Neuman, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Bestpractices in literacy instruction (pp. 90-97). New York: Guilford.
36. Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., & Associates. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really works with children (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
37. Rasinski, T. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening while reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147-150.
38. Routman, R. (1996). Literacy at the crossroads: Crucial talk about reading, writing, and other teaching dilemmas. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
39. Santa, C. M., & Hoien, T. (1999). An assessment of Early Steps: A program for early intervention of reading problems. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 54-79.
40. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A questionnaire to measure children's awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, 43, 454-461.
42. Shanahan, T. (1997). Reading-writing relationships, thematic units, inquiry learning. In pursuit of effective integrated literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 51(1), 12-19.
43. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
44. Tucker, J. A. (1988). Basic flashcard technique when vocabulary is the goal. Unpublished teaching material, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI.
45. Urdan, T. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 99-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
46. Wade, W., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 147-166.
47. Winograd, P., & Arrington, H. J. (1999). Best practices in literacy assessment. In L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, S. Neuman, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 210-241). New York: Guilford.
48. Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Zutell, J. (1998). Word sorting: A developmental spelling approach to word study for delayed readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 219-238.