Comparison of a word study phonics technique between students with moderate to mild mental retardation and struggling readers without disabilities

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 192-199

  Joseph, Laurice M ^a   McCachran, Megan ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244383509     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ball, E., & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phonemic awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling ? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66.
2. Barudin, S. I., & Hourcade, J. J. (1990). Relative effectiveness of three methods of reading instruction in developing specific recall and transfer skills in learners with moderate and severe mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 21, 286-291.
3. Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M. A., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (1996). Words their way: Word study phonics for vocabulary and spelling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bentin, S., & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It's a two way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 125-148.
5. Bracey, S., Maggs, A., & Morath, P. (1975). The effects of direct phonics approach in teaching reading with six moderately retarded children: Acquisition and mastery learning stages. Exceptional Child, 22, 83-90.
6. Browder, D., & Xin, Y. P. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130-153.
7. Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451-455.
8. Calhoon, J. A. (2001). Factors affecting the reading of rimes in words and nonwords in beginning readers with cognitive disabilities and typically developing readers: Explorations in similarity and difference in word recognition cue use. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 491-504.
9. Conners, F. A. (1992). Reading instruction for students with moderate mental retardation: Review and analysis of research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 577 597.
10. Crawley, J. F., & Parmar, R. S. (1995). Comparisons in reading and reading-related tasks among students with average intellectual ability and students with mild mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 25, 118-129.
11. Cunningham, P. (1999). What should we do about phonics? In B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, S. B. Nueman, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 68-89). New York: Guilford.
12. Elkonin, D. B. (1973). U. S. S. R. In J. Downing (Ed.), Comparative Reading (pp. 551-579). New York: Macmillan.
13. Gersten, R. M., & Maggs, A. (1982). Teaching the general case to moderately retarded children: Evaluation of a five year project. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 329-343.
14. Hendrick, W. B., Katims, D. S., & Carr, N.J. (1999). Implementing a multimethod, multilevel literacy program for students with mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 231-239.
15. Hoogeveen, F. R., Kouwenhoven, J. A., & Smeets, P. M. (1989). Establishing sound blending in moderately mentally retarded children: Implications of verbal instruction and pictorial prompting. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 333-348.
16. Hoogeveen, F. R., & Smeets, P. M. (1988). Establishing phoneme blending in trainable mentally retarded children. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 46-53.
17. Hoogeveen, F. R., Smeets, P. M., & van der Houven, J. E. (1987). Establishing letter-sound correspondences in children classified as trainable mentally retarded. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 77-84.
18. Joseph, L. M., Malacos, L., Evans, K. L., & Boelky, K. (2001, April). Phonics instruction and students with disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists. Washington, DC.
19. Kabrich, M., & McCutchen, D. (1996). Phonemic support in comprehension: Comparisons between children with and without mild mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 510-527.
20. Katims, D. S. (2000). Literacy instruction for people with mental retardation: Historical highlights and contem porary analysis. Education and Training in Mental Roardatum and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3-15.
21. Lane, S. D., & Critchfield, T. S. (1998). Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: Development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 21-41.
22. Morris, D., Shaw, B., & Perney, J. (1990). Helping low readers in grades 2 and 3: An after school volunteer tutoring program. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 133-150.
23. Nietupski, J., Williams, W., & York, R. (1979). Teaching selected phonic word analysis to TMR labeled students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 11, 140-143.
24. Santa, C. M., & Hoien, T. (1999). An assessment of Early Steps: A program for early intervention of reading problems. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 54-79.
25. Singh, J., & Singh, N. N. (1985). Comparison of word-supply and word-analysis error correction procedures on oral reading by mentally retarded children. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 90, 64-70.
26. Singh, N. N., & Singh, J. (1988). Increasing oral reading proficiency through overcorrection and phonic analysis. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 312-319.
27. Stahl, S., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Stahl, K. A. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but were afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 338-355.
28. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
29. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
30. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PROED.
31. Woodcock, R. W., McCrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2000). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Tests of Achievement-III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.