Advanced biomechanical methods for the computation of joint moments and muscular forces;Méthodes biomécaniques avancées pour le calcul des moments articulaires et des forces musculaires

IRBM

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 272-277

  Bonnefoy, A ^a,b,c   Robert, T ^d   Dumas, R ^a,b,c   Cheze, L ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b Lyon University   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d NONE

Author keywords

3D kinematics; Inertial parameters; Inverse dynamics; Muscular forces

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; DYNAMICS; JOINT; KINEMATICS; MUSCLE FORCE;

EID: 61649112205     PISSN: 19590318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmret.2008.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baker R. Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 3 (2006) 4
2. Ganley K.J., and Powers C.M. Determination of lower extremity anthropometric parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: the influence on net joint moments during gait. Clin Biomech 19 1 (2004) 50-56
3. Andrews J.G., and Mish S.P. Methods for investigating the sensitivity of joint resultants to body segment parameter variations. J Biomech 29 5 (1996) 651-654
4. Holden J.P., and Stanhope S.J. The effect of variation in knee center location estimates on net knee joint moments. Gait Posture 7 1 (1998) 1-6
5. Krabbe B., Farkas R., and Baumann W. Influence of inertia on intersegment moments of the lower extremity joints. J Biomech 30 5 (1997) 517-519
6. McCaw S.T., and DeVita P. Errors in alignment of center of pressure and foot coordinates affect predicted lower extremity torques. J Biomech 28 8 (1995) 985-988
7. McGibbon C.A., and Krebs D.E. The influence of segment endpoint kinematics on segmental power calculations. Gait Posture 7 3 (1998) 237-242
8. Pearsall D.J., and Costigan P.A. The effect of segment parameter error on gait analysis results. Gait Posture 9 3 (1999) 173-183
9. Rao G., Amarantini D., Berton E., and Favier D. Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. J Biomech 39 8 (2006) 1531-1536
10. Silva M.P., and Ambrosio J.A. Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait and Posture 19 1 (2004) 35-49
11. Stagni R., Leardini A., Cappozzo A., Grazia Benedetti M., and Cappello A. Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results. J Biomech 33 11 (2000) 1479-1487
12. Kirkwood R.N., Culham E.G., and Costigan P. Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14 4 (1999) 227-235
13. Challis J.H., and Kerwin D.G. Quantification of the uncertainties in resultant joint moments computed in a dynamic activity. J Sports Sci 14 3 (1996) 219-231
14. Challis J.H. Producing physiologically realistic individual muscle force estimations by imposing constraints when using optimization techniques. Med Eng Phys 19 3 (1997) 253-261
15. Raikova R.T., and Prilutsky B.I. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. J Biomech 34 10 (2001) 1243-1255
16. Herzog W., and Binding P. Predictions of antagonistic muscular activity using nonlinear optimization. Math Biosci 111 2 (1992) 217-229
17. Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., and Friederich J.A. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J Biomech 19 8 (1986) 589-596
18. Tsirakos D., Baltzopoulos V., and Bartlett R. Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 25 4-5 (1997) 371-407
19. van den Bogert A.J. Analysis and simulation of mechanical loads on the human musculoskeletal system: a methodological overview. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 22 (1994) 23-51
20. Erdemir A., McLean S., Herzog W., and van den Bogert A.J. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22 2 (2007) 131-154
21. Wu G., Siegler S., Allard P., Kirtley C., Leardini A., Rosenbaum D., et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 35 4 (2002) 543-548
22. Cheze L., Fregly B.J., and Dimnet J. A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. J Biomech 28 7 (1995) 879-884
23. Cheze L., Fregly B.J., and Dimnet J. Determination of functional joint axes from noisy marker data using the finite helical axis. Hum Mov Sci 17 (1998) 1-15
24. Cheze L., Gutierrez C., San-Marcelino R., and Dimnet J. Biomechanics of the upper limb using robotic techniques. Hum Mov Sci 15 (1996) 477-496
25. Charlton I.W., Tate P., Smyth P., and Roren L. Repeatability of an optimised lower body model. Gait Posture 20 2 (2004) 213-221
26. Reinbolt J.A., Schutte J.F., Fregly B.J., Koh B.I., Haftka R.T., George A.D., et al. Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization. J Biomech 38 3 (2005) 621-626
27. Senk M., and Cheze L. Rotation sequence as an important factor in shoulder kinematics. Clin Biomech 21 S1 (2006) S3-S8
28. Dumas R., Aissaoui R., and de Guise J.A. A 3D generic inverse dynamic method using wrench notation and quaternion algebra. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 7 3 (2004) 159-166
29. Jalon J.G., and Bayo E. Kinematic and dynamic simulation of mechanical systems - the real-time challenge (1994), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
30. Dumas R., and Cheze L. 3D inverse dynamics in non-orthonormal segment coordinate system. Med Biol Eng Comput 45 3 (2007) 315-322
31. Davis R.B.I., Ounpuu S., Tyburski D., and Gage J.R. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10 5 (1991) 575-587
32. Vaughan C.L., Davis B.L., and O'Connor J.C. Dynamics of human gait (1992), Hum Kinet, Champaign
33. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H.K., Wootten M.E., Gainey J., Gorton G., and Cochran G.V. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthopaedic Res 7 6 (1989) 849-860
34. Eng J.J., and Winter D.A. Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs during walking: what information can be gained from a three-dimensional model?. J Biomech 28 6 (1995) 753-758
35. Doriot N., and Cheze L. A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic study of the lower limb during the stance phase of gait using an homogeneous matrix approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Engin 51 1 (2004) 21-27
36. Dumas R., Nicol E., and Cheze L. Influence of the 3D inverse dynamic method on the joint forces and moments during gait. J Biomech Eng 129 5 (2007) 786-790
37. Dumas R, Nicol E, Cheze L. Influence of perturbated gait data on four 3D inverse dynamic methods. In: 9th Internationnal Symposium on the 3D Analysis of Human Movement; 2006 28-30 June; Valenciennes, France; 2006.
38. Dumas R., Aissaoui R., Mitton D., Skalli W., and de Guise J.A. Personalized body segment parameters from bi-planar low dose radiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Engin 52 (2005) 1756-1763
39. Dempster WT. Space requirements for the seated operator: Wright Air Development Center; 1955. Report No.: TR-55-159.
40. de Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 29 9 (1996) 1223-1230
41. Dumas R., Cheze L., and Verriest J.P. Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. body segment inertial parameters. J Biomech 40 3 (2007) 543-553
42. Young JW, Chandler RF, Snow CC, Robinette KM, Zehner GF, Lofberg MS. Anthropometric and mass distribution characteristics of the adult female: FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute; 1983. Report No.: FA-AM-83-16.
43. McConville JT, Churchill TD, Kaleps I, Clauser CE, Cuzzi J. Anthropometric relationships of body and body segment moments of inertia: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory; 1980. Report No.: AFAMRL-TR-80-119.
44. Dumas R, Skalli W, de Guise JA, Verriest J-P. Comparison of bi planar radiography and adjusted scaling equations for the computation of appropriate 3D body segment inertial parameters. SAE Technical paper; 2006. Report No.: 2006-01-2372.
45. Robert T. Analyse biomécanique du maintien de l'équilibre debout suite à une accélération transitoire de la surface d'appui - Application à l'amélioration de la protection des passagers debout de transport en commun (Thèse de Doctorat). Lyon: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon; 2006.
46. Robert T., Cheze L., Dumas R., and Verriest J.P. Validation of net joint loads calculated by inverse dynamics in case of complex movements: Application to balance recovery movements. J Biomech 40 11 (2007) 2450-2456
47. Vaughan C.L., Andrews J.G., and Hay J.G. Selection of body segment parameters by optimization methods. J Biomech Eng 104 1 (1982) 38-44
48. Kingma I., Toussaint H.M., De Looze M.P., and Van Dieen J.H. Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model. J Biomech 29 5 (1996) 693-704
49. Risher D.W., Schutte L.M., and Runge C.F. The use of inverse dynamics solutions in direct dynamics simulations. J Biomech Eng 119 4 (1997) 417-422
50. Pandy M.G. Mixed forward and inverse solutions in movement biomechanics. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6 3-4 (2005) 325-330
51. Kepple T.M., Sommer III H.J., Lohmann Siegel K., and Stanhope S.J. A three-dimensional musculoskeletal database for the lower extremities. J Biomech 31 1 (1998) 77-80
52. White S.C., Yack H.J., and Winter D.A. A three-dimensional musculoskeletal model for gait analysis. Anatomical variability estimates. J Biomech 22 8-9 (1989) 885-893
53. Pierrynowski M.R. Bases of three dimensional reconstruction. In: Allard P., Blanchi J.P., and Stokes I.A.F. (Eds). Three-dimensional analysis of human movement (1995), Hum Kinet, Champaign 19-40
54. Bonnefoy A., Doriot N., Senk M., Dohin B., Pradon D., and Cheze L. A non-invasive protocol to determine the personalized moment arms of knee and ankle muscles. J Biomech 40 8 (2007) 1776-1785
55. Bonnefoy A. Modèle cinématique et dynamique tridimensionnel du membre inférieur : Estimation des forces musculaires et des réactions articulaires au cours de la phase d'appui de la marche [Thèse de Doctorat] (2006), Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon-1, Lyon
56. Shelburne K.B., Torry M.R., and Pandy M.G. Muscle, ligament, and joint-contact forces at the knee during walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37 11 (2005) 1948-1956
57. Anderson F.C., and Pandy M.G. Dynamic optimization of human walking. J Biomech Eng 123 5 (2001) 381-390
58. Cholewicki J., and McGill S.M. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model. J Biomech 27 10 (1994) 1287-1289
59. Lloyd D.G., and Besier T.F. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech 36 6 (2003) 765-776
60. Bonnefoy A., Dumas R., Doriot N., Senk M., Pradon D., and Cheze L. Static optimization of muscle forces during the stance phase of the normal gait including the physiological properties of muscle in the objective function. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 10 S1 (2007) 59-60