Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1531-1536

  Rao, Guillaume ^a   Amarantini, David ^a   Berton, Eric ^a   Favier, Daniel ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

BSP estimation models; Gait; Inverse dynamics; Joint kinetics

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; FUNCTIONS; GAIT ANALYSIS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

BODY SEGMENT PARAMETERS (BSP) ESTIMATION MODELS; GAIT; INVERSE DYNAMICS; JOINT KINETICS;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; MALE; MASS; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WALKING SPEED;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; JOINTS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM;

EID: 33646414792     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrews J.G., and Mish S.P. Methods for investigating the sensitivity of joint resultants to body segment parameter variations. Journal of Biomechanics 29 (1996) 651-654
2. Besier T.F., Sturnieks D.L., Alderson J.A., and Lloyd D.G. Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. Journal of Biomechanics 36 (2003) 1159-1168
3. Cahouët V., Martin L., and Amarantini D. Static optimal estimation of joint accelerations for inverse dynamics problem solution. Journal of Biomechanics 35 (2002) 1507-1513
4. Challis J.H., and Kerwin D.G. Quantification of the uncertainties in resultant joint moments computed in a dynamic activity. Journal of Sports Sciences 14 (1996) 219-231
5. Chandler, R.F., Clauser, C.E., McConville, J.T., Reynolds, H.M., Young, J.W., 1975. Investigation of inertial properties of the human body. AMRL-TR-74-137, Ohio.
6. Charlton I.W., Tate P., Smyth P., and Roren L. Repeatability of an optimized lower body model. Gait and Posture 20 (2004) 213-221
7. De Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. Journal of Biomechanics 29 (1996) 1223-1230
8. Dempster, W.E., 1955. Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC-TR-55-159, Wright Air Development, Ohio.
9. Durkin J.L., and Dowling J.J. Analysis of body segment parameter differences between four human populations and the estimation errors of four popular mathematical models. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 125 (2003) 515-522
10. Ganley K.J., and Powers C.M. Determination of lower extremity anthropometric parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: the influence on net joint moments during gait. Clinical Biomechanics 19 (2004) 50-56
11. Giakas G., and Baltzopoulos V. Optimal digital filtering requires a different cut-off frequency strategy for the determination of the higher derivatives. Journal of Biomechanics 30 (1997) 851-855
12. Hanavan E.P. A Mathematical Model of the Human Body (1964), Aerospace Medical Division, Ohio pp. 64-102
13. Hatze H. The inverse dynamics problem of neuromuscular control. Biological Cybernetics 82 (2000) 133-141
14. Holden J.P., and Stanhope S.J. The effect of variation in knee center location estimates on net knee joint moments. Gait and Posture 7 (1998) 1-6
15. Kingma I., Toussaint H.M., De Looze M.P., and Van Dieen J.H. Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model. Journal of Biomechanics 29 (1996) 693-704
16. Kyle U.G., Genton L., Hans D., Karsegard V.L., Michel J., Slosman D.O., and Pichard C. Total body mass, fat mass, fat-free mass, and skeletal muscle in older people: cross-sectional differences in 60-year-old persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 49 (2001) 1633-1640
17. McCaw S.T., and DeVita P. Errors in alignment of center of pressure and foot coordinates affect predicted lower extremity torques. Journal of Biomechanics 28 (1995) 985-988
18. Pearsall D.J., and Costigan P.A. The effect of segment parameter error on gait analysis results. Gait and Posture 9 (1999) 173-183
19. Shan G., and Bohn C. Anthropometrical data and coefficients of regression related to gender and race. Applied Ergonomics 34 4 (2003) 327-337
20. Silva M.P., and Ambrosio J.A. Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait and Posture 19 (2004) 35-49
21. Van den Bogert A.J., de Koning, J.J., 1996. On optimal filtering for inverse dynamics analysis. Proceedings of the IXth Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics, Vancouver, pp. 214-215.
22. Winter D. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement (1990), Wiley-Interscience, Toronto, Ontario
23. Zatsiorsky, V., Seluyanov, V., 1983. The mass and inertial characteristics of main segments of the human body. In: Human Kinetics Matsui, H., Kobayashi, K. (Eds.), Biomechanics VIII-B. Champaign, Illinois, USA, pp. 1152-1159.
24. Zatsiorsky V., Seluyanov V., and Chugunova L. In vivo body segment inertial parameters determination using a gamma scanner method. In: Berme N., and Cappozzo A. (Eds). Biomechanics of Human Movement: Application in Rehabilitation, Sports and Ergonomics (1990), Bertec, Worthington 86-202