Curriculum-context knowledge: Teacher learning from successive enactments of a standards-based mathematics curriculum

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 287-320

  Choppin, Jeffrey Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61549118212     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2009.00444.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
2. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Carpenter, T. P., Blanton, M. L., Cobb, P., Franke, M. L., Kaput, J., & McClain, K. (2004). Scaling up innovative practices in mathematics and science (Research report). Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
5. Choppin, J. M. (2008, April). Linking policy, resources, and teachers' use of NSF-funded curriculum materials: Two districts' implementations of CMP. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New York.
6. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287-311.
7. Confrey, J., Strutchens, M. E., Battista, M., Smith, M. S., King, K. D., Sutton, J. T., et al. (2008). Situating research on curricular change. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2), 102-112.
8. Davenport, L. R. (2000). Elementary mathematics curricula as a tool for mathematics education reform: Challenges of implementation and implications for professional development. Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching, Education Development Center, Inc.
9. Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
10. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
11. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Lubienski, S. T., & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: The importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 313-345.
12. Hill, H., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
13. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
14. Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics teaching reform. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 23-31.
15. Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (1998). Connected Mathematics. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.
16. Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2004). Getting to know Connected Mathematics: An implementation guide. Needham, MA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
17. Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006). Bits and Pieces II unit, Connected Mathematics 2. Boston: Prentice Hall.
18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (2003). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
20. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: Understanding the connections. Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 27-41.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25. Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E. J., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 67-96.
26. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350.
27. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
28. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
29. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Trafton, P., Reys, B., & Wasman, D. (2001). Standards-based mathematics curriculum materials: A phrase in search of a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3), 259-264.
31. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.