A comparative study of cultural methods for the detection of Salmonella in feed and feed ingredients

BMC Veterinary Research

Volumn 5, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Koyuncu, Sevinc ^a   Haggblom, Per ^a  

^a NATIONAL VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; GLYCINE MAX; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SUIDAE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOD CONTROL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PH; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 61449093719     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17466148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-5-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents, antimicrobial resistance and foodborne outbreaks in the European Union in the 2005. The EFSA Journal 2006, 94:3-288.
2. Crump JA, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ. Bacterial contamination of animal feed and its relationship to human foodborne illness. Clin Infect Dis 2002, 35(7):859-865. 10.1086/342885, 12228823.
3. Maciorowski KG, Herrera P, Jones FT, Pillai SD, Ricke SC. Cultural and Immunological Detection Methods for Salmonella spp. in Animal Feeds - A Review. Vet Res Commun 2006, 30(2):127-137. 10.1007/s11259-006-3221-8, 16400599.
4. Hald T, Wingstrand A, Brondsted T, Lo Fo Wong DM. Human health impact of Salmonella contamination in imported soybean products: a semiquantitative risk assessment. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2006, 3(4):422-431. 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.422, 17199524.
5. Helfrick DL, Olsen SJ, Bishop RD. An atlas of Salmonella in the United States: serotype-specific surveillance, 1968-1998. 2000, Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services.
6. Davies R, Breslin M, Corry JE, Hudson W, Allen VM. Observations on the distribution and control of Salmonella species in two integrated broiler companies. Vet Rec 2001, 149(8):227-232.
7. Sauli I, Danuser J, Geeraerd AH, Van Impe JF, Rufenacht J, Bissig-Choisat B, Wenk C, Stark KD. Estimating the probability and level of contamination with Salmonella of feed for finishing pigs produced in Switzerland - the impact of the production pathway. Int J Food Microbiol 2005, 100(1-3):289-310. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.026, 15854713.
8. Osterberg J, Vagsholm I, Boqvist S, Lewerin SS. Feed-borne outbreak of Salmonella Cubana in Swedish pig farms: risk factors and factors affecting the restriction period in infected farms. Acta Vet Scand 2006, 47:13-21. 1618960, 16722302, 10.1186/1751-0147-47-13.
9. Karlsson K-A, Rutqvist L, Thal E. Salmonella isolated from Animals and Animal Feeds in Sweden during 1958-1962. Nord Vet Med 1963, 15:833-850.
10. Haggblom P. Monitoring and control of Salmonella in animal feed. International course on Salmonella control in animal production and products 1993; Malmö, Sweden 1993, 127-137.
11. Sternberg Lewerin S, Boquist B, Engström P, Häggblom P. The effective control of Salmonella in swedish poultry. Food safety in the poultry industry 2005, Cambridge, England: Woodhouse Publishing in Food science and technology, CRC Press, Mead GC.
12. Gardner IA. An epidemiologic critique of current microbial risk assessment practices: the importance of prevalence and test accuracy data. J Food Prot 2004, 67(9):2000-2007.
13. Geue L, Schluter H. A Salmonella monitoring programme in egg production farms in Germany. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1998, 45(2):95-103.
14. Salomonsson AC, Aspán A, Johansson S, Heino A, Häggblom P. Salmonella detection by polymerase chain reaction after pre-enrichment of feed samples. Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 2005, 13:96-110.
15. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. ISO 6579:2002 E standard. 1, rue de Varembé, CH. 1211 2002, Genéve 20, Switzerland: ISO Central Secretariat, 4.
16. NMKL (Nordic Committee on Food Analysis) Salmonella detection in foods. 1999, 71. NMKL. Oslo, Norway, 5.
17. Detection of Salmonella spp. in animal faeces and in samples from the primary production stage. Draft Amendment ISO 6579: 2002/amendedDAmd 1, (2006-09-12) Amendment 1 Annex D
18. De Smedt JM, Bolderdijk R, Rappold H, Lautenschlaeger D. Rapid Salmonella detection in foods by motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. Journal of Food Protection 1986, 49:510-514.
19. De Zutter L, De Smedt JM, Abrams R, Beckers H, Catteau M, de Borchgrave J, Debevere J, Hoekstra J, Jonkers F, Lenges J, et al. Collaborative study on the use of motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the detection of Salmonella from foods. Int J Food Microbiol 1991, 13(1):11-20. 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90131-8, 1863525.
20. Eriksson E, Aspan A. Comparison of culture, ELISA and PCR techniques for salmonella detection in faecal samples for cattle, pig and poultry. BMC Vet Res 2007, 3:21. 2110889, 17888169, 10.1186/1746-6148-3-21.
21. Voogt N, Raes M, Wannet WJ, Henken AM, Giessen AW. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001, 32(2):89-92. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00865.x, 11169049.
22. Wiberg C, Norberg P. Comparison between a cultural procedure using Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and motility enrichments on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for Salmonella detection from food and feed. Int J Food Microbiol 1996, 29(2-3):353-360. 10.1016/0168-1605(95)00074-7, 8796434.
23. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards on a request from the Health and Consumer Protection, Directorate General, European Commission on Microbiological Risk Assessment in feedingstuffs for food producing animals. The EFSA Journal 2008, 720:1-84.
24. Schonenbrucher V, Mallinson ET, Bulte M. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella species including three new chromogenic plating media. Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 123(1-2):61-66. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.064, 18192050.
25. Glaeser H. Detection of pathogenic micro-organisms-a contribution to discussion. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2004, 111(5):193-195.
26. van Schothorst M, Renaud AM. Malachite green pre-enrichment medium for improved salmonella isolation from heavily contaminated samples. J Appl Bacteriol 1985, 59(3):223-230.
27. D'Aoust JY. Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens, Salmonella. Doyle MP edn. New York 1989,
28. van Schothorst M, Renaud AM. Dynamics of salmonella isolation with modified Rappaport's medium (R10). J Appl Bacteriol 1983, 54(2):209-215.
29. Bauwens L, Vercammen F, Bertrand S, Collard JM, De Ceuster S. Isolation of Salmonella from environmental samples collected in the reptile department of Antwerp Zoo using different selective methods. J Appl Microbiol 2006, 101(2):284-289. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02977.x, 16882135.
30. Poppe C, Mann ED, Shaw S, Warburton D, Sewell A. Procedure for the isolation of Salmonella species by the modified semi-solid Rappaport Vassiliadis (MSRV) method. 2004, Ottawa: Health Canada, Health Products and Food Branch.
31. Boix A, Von Holst C, Baeten V, Berben G, Vancutsem J. Determination of Processed Animal Protein (PAPS) including meat and bone meal (MBM) in feed. Part I and II. 2004, European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre.
32. Jaynes ET. Confidence Intervals vs. Bayesian Intervals. Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science 1976, 175. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, Harper WL, Hooker CA.
33. Nicholson BJ. On the F-Distribution for Calculating Bayes Credible Intervals for Fraction Nonconforming. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1985, R-34(3):227-228.