Gifted adolescents’ overexcitabilities and self-concepts: An analysis of gender and grade level

Roeper Review

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 240-248

  Gross, Candace M ^a,b   Rinn, Anne N ^b   Jamieson, Kelly M ^b,c  

^a Northwestern College Orance City   (United States)

^b WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349132210     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190709554418     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ablard, K E (1997) Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender Roeper Review, 20, 110-115
2. Ackerman, C M (1997) Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics Dabrowski’s overexcitabihties Roeper Review, 19, 229-237
3. Bouchard, L L (2004) An instrument for the measure of Dabrowskian overexcitabihties to identity gifted elementary students Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 339-350
4. Bouchet, N, & Falk, R., (2001) The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability Gifted Child Quarterly; 45, 260-267
5. Byrne, B M, & Shavelson, R J (1996) On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model Journal of Personality of Social Psychology, 70, 599-613
6. Colangelo, N, & Pfleger, L R (1978) Academic self-concept of gifted high school students Roeper Review, 1, 10-11
7. Dabrowski, K (1937) Psychological basis of self-mutilation Genetic Psychology Monographs, 19, 1-104
8. Dabrowski, K (1964) Positive disintegration Boston Little, Brown
9. Dabrowski, K. (1972) Psychoneurosis is not an illness London Gryf
10. Dabrowski, K, Kawczak, A, & Piechowski, M M (1970) Mental growth through positive disintegration London Gryf
11. Dabrowski, K, & Piechowski, M M (1977) Theory of levels of emotional developmental (Vols 1 & 2) Oceanside, NY
12. Dabor Science Dai, D Y (2001) A comparison of gender differences in academic self-concept and motivation between high-ability and average Chinese adolescents Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 22-32
13. Falk, R F, Lind, S, Miller, N B, Piechowski, M M, & Silverman, L K. (1999) The over excitabihty questionnaire-two (OEQII) Manual, scoring system, and questionnaire Denver, CO Institute for the Study of Advanced Development
14. Gabelko, N H, Roth, D A, & Worrell, FC (1997, March) Age and gender differences in global, academic, social, and athletic self-concepts Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL
15. Gallagher, S A (1986) A comparison of the concept of over excitabihties with measures of creativity and school achievement m sixth-grade students Roeper Review, 8, 115-119
16. Gilman, R, Laughlm, J E, & Huebner, E S (1999) Validation of the Self-Description Questionnaire-II with an American sample School Psychology International, 20, 300-307
17. ? The possibilities of misdiagnosis Roeper Review, 26, 73-77
18. Hoge, R D, & Renzulh, J S (1993) Explonng the lmk between giftedness and self-concept Review of Educational Research, 63, 449-465
19. Kelly, K. R, & Colangelo, N (1984) Academic and social self-concepts of gifted, general, and special students Exceptional Children, 50, 551-554
20. Kelly, K. R, & Jordan, L K (1990) Effects of academic achievement and gender on academic and social self-concept A replication study Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 173-177
21. Kitano, M K. (1990) Intellectual abilities and psychological intensities in young children Implications for the gifted Roeper Review, 13, 5-11
22. Klein, A G, & Zehms, D (1996) Self-concept and gifted girls A cross sectional study of intellectually gifted females in grades 3,5,8 Roeper Review, 19, 30-35
23. Marsh, H W (1989) Age and sex effects m multiple dimensions of self-concept Preadolescence to early adulthood Journal of Educational Psychology 81, 417-430
24. Marsh, H W (1990) Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II Manual New South Wales, Australia University of Western Sydney
25. Marsh, H W, & O’Neill, R (1984) Self Description Questionnaire IH The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174
26. Marsh, H W, & Shavelson, R (1985) Self-concept Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure Educational Psychologists, 20, 107-123
27. Miller, N B, Silverman, L K, & Falk, R., (1994) Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 20-38
28. Norman, A D, Ramsay, S G.Martray, C R, & Roberts, J L (1999) Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment Roeper Review, 22, 5-10
29. O’conner, K J (2002) The application of Dabrowski’s theory to the gifted In M Nei-hart, S M Reis, N M Robinson, & S M Moon (Eds), The social and emotional development of gifted children What do we know ? (pp 51-60) Washington, DC Prufrock Press
30. Piechowski, M M (1979) Developmental potential In N Colangelo & R R Zaffrann (Eds), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp 25-58) Dubuque, IA Kendall/Hunt
31. Piechowski, M M (1992) Emotional development and emotional giftedness In N Colangelo & G Davis (Eds), Handbook of gifted education (pp 285-305) Needham Heights, MA Allyn & Bacon
32. Piechowski, M M, & Colangelo, N (1984) Developmental potential of the gifted Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80-88
33. Piechowski, M M, & Cunningham, K (1985) Patterns of overexcitabihty in a group of artists Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 153-174
34. Piechowski, M M, & Miller, N (1995) Assessing developmental potential in gifted children A comparison of methods Roeper Review, 17, 176-181
35. Plucker, J A, Taylor, J W V, Callahan, C M, & Tomchm, E M (1997) Mirror, mirror, on the wall Reliability and validity evidence for the Self-Descnption Questionnaire II with gifted students Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 704-713
36. Pyryt, M C, & Mendagho, S (1994) The multidimensional self-concept A comparison of gifted and average-abihty adolescents Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 299-305
37. Rinn, A N (2006) Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted adolescents Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 65-75
38. Rmn, A N, & Wininger, S R (2006) Sports participation among academically gifted adolescents Relationship to the multidimensional self concept Manuscript submitted for publication
39. Ross, A, & Parker, M (1980) Academic and social self concepts of the academically gifted Exceptional Children, 47, 6-10
40. Shavelson, R J, Hubner, J J, & Stanton, G C (1976) Validation of construct interpretations Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441
41. Stocking, V B, Porter, L C, & Goldstein, D (1993, April) The self-concept of talented adolescents in an intensive summer program Implications for programming Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA
42. Wilson, PL (1998) Multidimensional Self Concept Scale An examination of grade, race, and gender differences in third through sixth grade students’ self-concepts Psychology in the Schools, 35, 317-326
43. Worrell, F C, Roth, D A, & Gabelko, N H (1998) Age and gender differences in the self-concepts of academically talented students Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 157-162