Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance

Organization Science

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 143-159

  Heli, Wang ^a   Jaepil, Choi ^a   Jiatao, Li ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Corporate financial performance; Corporate philanthropy; Environmental dynamism

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349120803     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0271     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Adams, M., P. Hardwick. 1998. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. J. Management Stud. 35 641-654.
2. Backhaus, K. B., B. A. Stone, K. Heiner. 2002. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus. Soc. 41 292-318.
3. Barber, B. M., J. D. Lyon. 1996. Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Financial Econom. 43 341-372.
4. Barnett, M. L. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32 794-816.
5. Barnett, M. L., R. M. Salomon. 2003. Throwing a curve at socially responsible investing research. Organ. Environment 16 381-389.
6. Barnett, M. L., R. M. Salomon. 2006. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 27 1101-1122.
7. Beck, N., J. N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with timeseries-cross-section data in comparative politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 89 634-647.
8. Berle, A. A., G. C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Macmillan, New York.
9. Berman, S. L., R. A. Phillips, A. C. Wicks. 2005. Resource dependence, managerial discretion and stakeholder performance. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc., Honolulu, B1-B6.
10. Berman, S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. K. Kotha, T. M. Jones. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad. Management J. 42 488-506.
11. Bhattacharya, C. B., S. Sen. 2003. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies. J. Marketing 67 76-88.
12. Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. 6 29-39.
13. Bowman, E. H., M. Haire. 1975. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. Calif. Management Rev. 18 49-58.
14. Boyd, B. 1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management J. 11 419-430.
15. Brammer, S., A. Millington. 2003. The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. J. Bus. Ethics 45 213-226.
16. Brammer, S., A. Millington. 2004a. The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. J. Management Stud. 41 1411-1434.
17. Brammer, S., A. Millington. 2004b. Stakeholder pressure, organizational size, and the allocation of departmental responsibility for the management of corporate charitable giving. Bus. Soc. 43 268-295.
18. Brammer, S., A. Millington. 2005. Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 61 29-44.
19. Buchholtz, A. K., A. C. Amason, M. A. Rutherford. 1999. Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Bus. Soc. 38 167-187.
20. Campa, J. M., S. Kedia. 2002. Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 57 1731-1762.
21. Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad. Management Rev. 4 497-506.
22. Claessens, S., S. Djankov. 1999. Enterprise performance and management turnover in the Czech Republic. Eur. Econom. Rev. 43 1115-1124.
23. Dess, G. G., D. W. Beard. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29 52-73.
24. Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich, C. V. Harquail. 1994. Organizational images and member identifications. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39 239-263.
25. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14 57-74.
26. Fama, E., K. R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47 427-465.
27. Farrell, J. 2001. Monopoly slack and competitive rigor. E. Rasmusen, ed. Readings in Games and Information. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
28. File, K. M., R. A. Prince. 1998. Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise. J. Bus. Ethics 17(14) 1529-1539.
29. Fombmn, C. J., N. A. Gardberg, M. L. Barnett. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate reputation and reputational risk. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(1) 85-106.
30. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
31. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13) 122-126.
32. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 24 191-206.
33. Fry, L. W., G. D. Keim, R. E. Meiners. 1982. Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Acad. Management J. 25 94-106.
34. Galaskiewicz, J. 1991. Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. W. W. Powell, P. J. DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 293-310.
35. Galaskiewicz, J., R. S. Burt. 1991. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36 88-105.
36. Galbraith, J. A. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston, MA.
37. Godfrey, P. C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30 777-798.
38. Goll, I., A. A. Rasheed. 2004. The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. J. Bus. Ethics 49 41-54.
39. Graves, S. B., S. A. Waddock. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 37 1034-1046.
40. Greene, W. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Macmillan, New York.
41. Greening, D. W., D. B. Turban. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 39 254-280.
42. Griffin, J. J. 2004. Corporate restructurings: Ripple effects on corporate philanthropy. J. Public Affairs 4 27-43.
43. Griffin, J. J., J. F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36 5-31.
44. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. 10 92-116.
45. Haley, U. 1991. Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. J. Management Stud. 28 485-509.
46. Hall, B. H. 1999. Innovation and market value. Working Paper 6984, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
47. Hambrick, D. C., S. Finkelstein. 1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizations. L. L. Cummings, B. M. Staw, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 369-406.
48. Harrison, J. S., R. E. Freeman. 1999. Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Acad. Management J. 42 479-485.
49. Hart, O. D. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
50. Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 153-161.
51. Hemingway, C. A., P. W. Maclagan. 2004. Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 50 33-44.
52. Hill, C. W. L., T. M. Jones. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. J. Management Stud. 29 131-154.
53. Hillman, A. J., G. D. Keim. 2001. Stakeholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22 125-139.
54. Hirschey, M., J. J. Weygandt. 1985. Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. J. Account. Res. 23 326-335.
55. Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76 323-339.
56. Jensen, M. C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, S. S. Rahman, eds. Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK, 65-84.
57. Jensen, M. C., W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3 305-360.
58. Jensen, M. C., W. H. Meckling. 1992. Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. W. Lars, H. Wijkander, eds. Contract Economics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. UK, 251-274.
59. Johnson, R. A., D. W. Greening. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 42 564-576.
60. Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Management Rev. 20 404-437.
61. Kristensen, I. P., G. Wawro. 2006. Lagging the dog?: The robustness of panel-corrected standard errors in the presence of serial correlation and observation specific effects. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York.
62. Lafontaine, F., J. K. Shaw. 1999. The dynamics of franchise contracting: Evidence from panel data. J. Political Econom. 107 1041-1080.
63. Lawrence, P., J. Lorsch. 1967. Organization and Environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
64. Levy, F., G. Shatto. 1978. An evaluation of corporate contributions. Public Choice 33 19-28.
65. Lindenberg, E. B., S. A. Ross. 1981. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. J. Bus. 54 1-32.
66. Malone, T. W., K. Crowston. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys 26 87-119.
67. Marquis, C., M. Glynn, G. F. Davis. 2007. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32 925-945.
68. Mc Williams, A., D. Siegel. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management J. 21 603-609.
69. McWilliams, A., D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26 117-127.
70. Milliken, F. 1987. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1) 133-143.
71. Morck, R., B. Yeung. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. J. Bus. 64 165-187.
72. Navarro, P. 1988. Why do corporations give to charity? J. Bus. 61 65-93.
73. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16 145-179.
74. Orlitzky, M., L. Schmidt, S. L. Rynes. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24 403-441.
75. Pfeffer, J., G. R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
76. Preston, L. E., D. P. O'Bannon. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Bus. Soc. 36 419-429.
77. Rowley, T. J., S. Berman. 2000. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Bus. Soc. 39 397-418.
78. Saiia, D. H., A. B. Carroll, A. K. Buchholtz. 2003. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity "begins at home." Bus. Soc. 42 169-201.
79. Seifert, B., S. A. Morris, B. R. Bartkus. 2004. Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Bus. Soc. 43 135-161.
80. Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. 29 562-585.
81. Stanwick, P., S. Stanwick. 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. J. Bus. Ethics 17 195-204.
82. Strong, J. W. 1999. McCormick on Evidence. West Group, St. Paul, MN.
83. Sturdivant, F. D., J. L. Ginter. 1977. Corporate social responsiveness: Management attitudes and economic performance. Calif. Management Rev. 19 30-39.
84. Turban, D. B., D. W. Greening. 1996. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Management J. 40 658-672.
85. Ullmann, A. A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Acad. Management Rev. 10 540-557.
86. Villalonga, B. 2004. Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 54 205-230.
87. Waddock, S. A., S. B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18 303-319.
88. Werbel, J. D., S. M. Carter. 2002. The CEO's influence on corporate foundation giving. J. Bus. Ethics 40 47-60.
89. Wokutch, R. E., B. A. Spencer. 1987. Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance. Calif. Management Rev. 28 62-77.