Performing school reform in the age of the political spectacle

Performance Theories in Education: Power, Pedagogy, and the Politics of Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 199-220

  Anderson, Gary L ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249125159     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611598     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Urrieta, L., Jr. (2003b). Las identidades también lloran [Identities also cry: Exploring the human side of indigenous latina/o identities]. Educational Studies Journal, 34(2), 147-168.
2. Urrieta, L., Jr. (2004). Orchestrating habitus and figured worlds: Chicana/o educational mobility and social class. In J. Van Galen, G. Nobilt, & W. Johnson (Eds.), Late to class (pp. ). Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Urrieta, L., Jr., & Quach, L. (2000). My language speaks of me: Transmutational identities in L2 acquisition. The High School Journal, 84(1).
4. Adkins, L., & Lury, C. (1999). The labour of identity: Performing identities, performing economies. Economy and Society, 28(4), 598-614.
5. Anderson, G. L. (1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(1), 38-59.
6. Anderson, G. L., & Grinberg, J. (1998). Educational administration as a disciplinary practice: Appropriating Foucault's view of power, discourse, and method. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 329-353.
7. Apple, M. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409-423.
8. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1963). Decisions and non decisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 56(1), 947-952.
9. Ball, S. (1998). Labour, learning, and the economy: A "policy sociology" perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(2), 195-206.
10. Ball, S. (2001). Performativites and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In D. Gleason & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Man-aging, teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 210-226). London: Routledge/Falmer.
11. Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.
12. Bartlett, L., Frederick, M., & Gulbrandsen, T. (2002). The marketization of education: Public schools for private ends. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 33(1), 5-29.
13. Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Boggs, C. (2000). The end of politics: Corporate power and the decline of the public sphere. New York: Guilford Press.
15. Brantlinger, E., Majd-Jabbari, M., & Guskin, S. L. (1985). Self-interest and liberal educational discourse: How ideology works for middle-class mothers. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 571-598.
16. Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Carey, A. (1995). Taking the risk out of democracy: Corporate propaganda versus freedom and liberty. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
18. Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
19. Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs?: Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Debord, G. (1967). The society of the spectacle. Boston: Zone Books.
21. Delpit, L. (1994). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
22. Edelman, M. (1967). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.
23. Edelman, M. (1978). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.
24. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.
25. Elliott, J. (2002). Characteristics of performance cultures: Their central paradoxes and limitations as resources for educational reform. In D. Gleason & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing, teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 192-209). London: Routledge/Falmer.
26. Ehrenreich, B. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
27. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
28. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Fuller, H. (1997, April). The crisis in urban education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
30. Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. London: Routledge.
31. Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon.
32. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities. New York: Harper.
33. Kuttner, R. (1996). Everything for sale: The virtues and limits of markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Lasch, C. (1995). The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy. New York: W. W. Norton.
35. Levin, H. (1998). Educational performance standards and the economy. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 4-10.
36. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
37. Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge ( G. Bennington & B. Massouri, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
38. MacArthur, J. R., & Bagdikian, B. (1993). Second front: Censorship and propaganda in the Gulf War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1846/1965). The German ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
40. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.
41. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 341-363.
42. Mickelson, R. (1999). International business machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 476-506.
43. Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Molnar, A. (1996). Giving kids the business: The commercialization of America's schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46. Neuman, S. (2003). Lynch Now Networks' Objective: The disputed facts don't matter. The hype of the private's rescue makes her story rights a prize. The Los Angeles Times, June 22, p. 22.
47. Parker, L., & Margonis, F. (1996). School choice in the U.S. urban context: Racism and policies of containment. Journal of Education Policy, 21(6), 717-728.
48. Peters, M. (2001). Poststructuralism, Marxism, and neoliberalism. Boston: Rowman and Littlefield.
49. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. Schemo, D. (2003). Questions on data cloud luster of Houston schools. The New York Times, July 11, p. 1.
51. Shipps, D. (1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school reform. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 73-117.
52. Shirley, D. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
53. Smith, M. L., Miller-Kahn, L., Heinecke, W., & Jarvis, P. (1999). Political spectacle and the fate of American schools. New York: Routledge/Falmer.
54. Stone, L. (1999). Educational reform through an ethic of performativity: Introducing the special issue. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18, 299-307.
55. Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Vinson, K. (2003). Surveillance and spectacle. In K. Vinson & W. Ross (Eds.), Image and education: Teaching in the face of the new disciplinarity (pp. 43-60). New York: Peter Lang.
58. Welch, A. (1998). The cult of efficiency in education: Comparative reflections on the reality and the rhetoric. Comparative Education, 34(2), 157-175.
59. Wells, A. S., Lopez, A., Scott, J., & Holme, J. J. (1999). Charter schools as postmodern paradox: Rethinking social stratification in an age of deregulated school choice. Harvard Educational Review, 69(2), 1-25.