Deployment Performance and Retrievability of the Cook Celect Vena Cava Filter

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 375-383

  Smouse, H Bob ^a   Van Alstine, William G ^b   Mack, Susan ^c   McCann Brown, Jennifer A ^c  

^a OSF SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Med Institute Inc Lafayette   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SHEEP; VENA CAVA FILTER;

ANIMALS; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SHEEP; VENA CAVA FILTERS; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 60649088622     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.12.406     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Yamagami T., Kato T., Hirota T., et al. Prophylactic implantation of inferior vena cava filter during interventional radiological treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Br J Radiol 79 (2006) 584-591
2. Hoff W.S., Hoey B.A., Wainwright G.A., et al. Early experience with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg 199 (2004) 869-874
3. Comerota A.J. Retrievable IVC filters: a decision matrix for appropriate utilization. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 18 (2006) 11-18
4. Kaufman J.A., Kinney T.B., Streiff M.B., et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 (2006) 449-459
5. Chiou A.C., Biggs K.L., and Matsumura J.S. Vena cava filters: why, when, what, how?. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 17 (2005) 329-339
6. Terhaar O.A., Lyon S.M., Given S.M., et al. Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15 (2004) 1257-1262
7. De Gregorio M.A., Gamboa P., Bonilla D.L., et al. Retrieval of Günther Tulip optional vena cava filters 30 days after implantation: a prospective clinical study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 (2006) 1781-1789
8. Looby S., Given M.F., Geoghegan T., McErlean A., and Lee M.J. Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30 (2007) 59-65
9. Binkert C.A., Bansal A., and Gates J.D. Inferior vena cava filter removal after 317-day implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16 (2005) 395-398
10. Kachura J.R. Inferior vena cava filter removal after 475-day implantation [letter]. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8 (2005) 1156-1158
11. Smouse HB, Rosenthal D, Van Ha T, et al. Effect of implant duration on retrieval success rate for the Günther Tulip vena cava filter. In press.
12. Mobin-Uddin K., McLean R., Bolooki H., and Jude J.R. Caval interruption for prevention of pulmonary embolism: long-term results of a new method. Arch Surg 99 (1969) 711-715
13. Greenfield L.F., McCurdy J.R., Brown P.P., and Elkins R.C. A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 73 (1973) 599-606
14. Kinney T.B. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 (2003) 425-440
15. Oliva V.L., Perreault P., Giroux M.F., Bouchard L., Therasse E., and Soulez G. Recovery G2 inferior vena cava filter: technical success and safety of retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 (2008) 884-889
16. Kaufman JA, Binkert CA, Drooz AT, et al. Multicenter retrievability trial of the Recovery G2 filter. Presented at the SIR Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington, DC, March 15-20, 2008.
17. Ashley D.W., Mix J.W., Christie B., et al. Removal of the OptEase retrievable vena cava filter is not feasible after extended time periods because of filter protrusion through the vena cava. J Trauma 59 (2005) 847-852
18. Stavropoulos S.W., Dixon R.G., Burke C.T., et al. Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 (2008) 1297-1301
19. De Gregorio M.A., Gamboa P., Gimeno M.J., et al. The Günther Tulip retrievable filter: prolonged temporary filtration by repositioning within the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10 (2003) 1259-1265
20. Tay K.-H., Martin M.L., Fry P.D., et al. Repeated Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter repositioning to prolong implantation time. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13 (2002) 509-512
21. Rosenthal D., Swischuk J.L., Cohen S.A., and Wellons E.D. OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience. Vascular 13 (2005) 286-289
22. Neuerburg J., Günther R.W., Rassmussen E., et al. New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16 (1993) 224-229
23. de Gregorio M.A., Gimeno M.J., Tobio R., et al. Animal experience in the Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 6 (2001) 413-417
24. Wicky S., Doenz F., Meuwly J.Y., Portier F., Schnyder P., and Denys A. Clinical experience with retrievable Günther Tulip vena cava filters. J Endovasc Ther 10 (2003) 994-1000
25. Hoppe H., Nutting C.W., Smouse H.R., et al. Günther Tulip filter retrievability multicenter study including CT follow-up: final report. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 (2006) 1017-1023
26. Millward S.F., Oliva V.L., Bell S.D., et al. Günther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12 (2001) 1053-1058
27. Günther R.W., Neuerburg J., Mossdorf A., et al. New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval: in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency (abstract). Rofo 5 (2005) 632-636