Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1257-1262

  Terhaar, Olaf Alfons ^a   Lyon, Stuart Macalister ^a   Given, Mark Frank ^a   Foster, Anne Elizabeth ^a   Mc Grath, Frank ^a   Lee, Michael J ^a  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

ADULT; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DRUG CONTRAINDICATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HORNER SYNDROME; HUMAN; ILIOFEMORAL THROMBUS; JUGULAR VEIN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PNEUMOTHORAX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; THROMBUS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; VEIN THROMBOSIS; VENA CAVA FILTER;

EID: 8444232424     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000134497.50590.E2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Grassi CJ, Swan TL, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous permanent inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:137-141.
2. Ihnat DM, Mills JL, Hughees JD, et al. Treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism and malignant desease: Should vena cava filter placement be routine? J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 800-807.
3. Millward SF. Temporary and retrievable inferior vena cava filters: current status. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9:381-387.
4. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, et al. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216:54-66.
5. Ferris EJ, Mc Cowan TC, Carver DK, et al. Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:851-856.
6. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:409-415.
7. Greenfield LJ, Rutherford RB. Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1013-1019.
8. Kinney TB, Rose SC, Weingarten KE, et al. IVC Filter Tilt and Asymmetry: Comparison of the Over-the-Wire Stainless-Steel and Titanium Greenfiled IVC Filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8:1029-1037.
9. Girard P, Tardy B, Decousus H. Inferior vena cava interruption: how and when? Annu Rev Med 2000; 51:1-15.
10. Lorch H, Welger D, Wagner V, et al. Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion: a multicenter registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:83-88.
11. Rossi P, Arata FM, Bonaiuti P, et al. Fatal outcome in atrial migration of the Tempofilter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999; 22:227-231.
12. Kelly IM, Boyd CS. Buckling of the tethering catheter causes migration of a temporary filter to the right atrium. Clin Radiol 1999; 54:398-401.
13. Linsenmaier U, Riger J, Schenk F, et al. Indications, management, and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998; 21:464-469.
14. Neuerburg JM, Gunther RW, Vorwerk D, et al. Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20: 10-16.
15. Millward SF, Bhargava A, Aquino J, et al. Gunther Tulip filter: preliminary clinical experience with retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:75-82.
16. Vos LD, tielbeek AV, Bom, et al. The Gunther temporary inferior vena cava filter for short-term protection against pulmonary embolism. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20:91-97.
17. Neuerburg JM, Handt S, Beckert K, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: feasibility, short- and long-term changes-An experimental study in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24:418-423.
18. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al. Gunther Tulip Retrievable Vena Cava Filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:1053-1058.
19. Zwaan M, Lorch H, Kulke C, et al. Clinical experience with temporary vena caval filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9:594-601.
20. Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Sharp WJ, et al. Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:235-245.
21. Kaufman JA, Geller SE, Rivitz M, et al. Operator errors during percutaneous placement of vena cava filters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1281-1287.
22. Crochet D, Grossetete R, Bach-Lijour B, Larguier L, Le Nihouannen JC. Evaluation of the LGM vena-tech infrarenal vena caval filter in an ovine venous thromboembolism model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:739-745.
23. Pavcnik D, Uchida BT, Keller FS, Corless CC, Rosch J. Retrievable IVC square stent filter: experimental study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999; 22: 239-245.
24. Asch MR. Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 2002; 225: 835-844.
25. Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Complications of interior vena cava filters. Am Surg 2003; 69:654-659.
26. Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:425-440.
27. Whitehill TA. Caval interruption methods: comparison of options. Semin Vasc Surg 1996; 9:59-69.
28. Moores LK, Tapson VF. Vena caval filters in pulmonary embolism. Semin Vasc Med 2001; 1:221-228.